Maxim® Knee Pop-Top® Tibia vs. Regular Maxim® Knee Tibia

June 19, 2017 updated by: Biomet Orthopedics, LLC

A Randomized Data Collection of the Maxim® Knee System With Removable Molded Polyethylene Tibia and the Regular Maxim® Knee System

The purpose of this prospective clinical data collection is to compare the outcomes of two different tibial bearings: the Maxim® Pop-Top® Tibia and Maxim® Modular Tibia.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The purpose of this prospective clinical data collection is to document and compare the performance and clinical outcomes between the Maxim® Knee System with Removable Molded Poly Tibia and the Maxim® Knee System with Modular Tibial Bearing as two treatment groups.

FDA has cleared these devices via Premarket Notification 510(k)'s K991753, K984623, K993159, K010027. The data gathered will be collated and used to provide feedback to designing engineers, support marketing efforts and answer potential questions from reimbursement agencies.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

31

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Indiana
      • Warsaw, Indiana, United States, 46581
        • Biomet Orthopedics, LLC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Identical to the indications stated in the FDA approved labeling for the device (cleared in 510(k) K991753,

K984623, K993159, K010027). These indications are stated below:

  • Painful and disabled knee joint resulting from osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, traumatic arthritis where one or more compartments are involved.
  • Correction of varus, valgus, or posttraumatic deformity.
  • Correction or revision of unsuccessful osteotomy, arthrodesis, or failure of previous joint replacement procedure.

Patient selection factors to be considered include:

  • need to obtain pain relief and improve function,
  • ability and willingness of the patient to follow instructions, including control of weight and activity level,
  • a good nutritional state of the patient,
  • the patient must have reached full skeletal maturity.
  • Porous coated knee joint replacement prostheses have not been approved for non-cemented applications in the United States.

Exclusion Criteria:

Identical to the contraindications stated in the FDA approved labeling for the device (cleared in 510(k) K991753, K984623, K993159, K010027's). These contraindications are stated below:

Absolute contraindications include:

  • infection,
  • sepsis
  • osteomyelitis.

Relative contraindications include:

  • uncooperative patient or patient with neurologic disorders who are incapable of following directions,
  • Osteoporosis,
  • metabolic disorders which may impair bone formation,
  • osteomalacia,
  • distant foci of infections which may spread to the implant site,
  • rapid joint destruction, marked bone loss or bone resorption apparent on roentgenogram,
  • vascular insufficiency, muscular atrophy, neuromuscular disease,
  • incomplete or deficient soft tissue surrounding the knee.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: 1
Maxim® Pop-Top® Tibia
Used for total knee replacements
Other Names:
  • Maxim® Pop-Top® Tibia
Other: 2
Maxim® Regular Tibia
Used for total knee replacements
Other Names:
  • Modular Tibia

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Knee Society Function Score
Time Frame: 1 Year
The function score is detailed below as a Range; 100 being the highest score, and 0 being the lowest score. 90-100 is considered "Excellent," 60-89 is considered "Good," 30-59 is considered "fair," and 0-29 is considered "poor."
1 Year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Range of Motion - Flexion
Time Frame: 1 Year
This represents how far the patients were able to flex the knee in the clinic at 1-year.
1 Year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Russell Wagner, MD, Harris Methodist Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2004

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2007

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2007

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 17, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

December 21, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 17, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 19, 2017

Last Verified

June 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 62-U-007

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe