Nasal Potential Difference (NPD) for the Diagnosis of Cystic Fibrosis

January 27, 2020 updated by: Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Measurement of Transepithelial Nasal Potential Difference (NPD) for the Diagnosis of Cystic Fibrosis

The purpose of this research study is to provide a novel method for the diagnosis of Cystic Fibrosis (CF). This protocol is designed to test the ability of the cells to regulate the movement of salt and water in people with features of CF in whom the diagnosis is not entirely clear. We will be studying these cells in the nose, by a technique called nasal transepithelial potential difference (NPD).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Cystic Fibrosis (CF) is an autosomal recessive systemic disorder of exocrine glands and secretory epithelia. The disease results from mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene which cause a variety of abnormalities. CFTR is absent or dysfunctional in cystic fibrosis. Most of the defects in CFTR result in abnormal chloride ion transport and abnormally viscous mucus. Nasal epithelial CFTR function will be assessed by the NPD procedure.

NPD measurements are useful as a diagnostic tool in individuals with borderline or normal sweat chlorides, one or no identified CFTR mutations, and a clinical history suggestive of CF. The NPD has become the gold standard for detection and quantification of CFTR function in the airways. The assay has also served as an important endpoint since 1981. It has been used extensively and is standardized to assess the ability of new therapeutics in studies designed to replace, repair or restore defective ion transport in CF patients.

The assay basically involves dripping small amounts of the test solutions into the anterior nostril in order to measure uptake or secretion of sodium and chloride. There are five solutions required for the NPD measurement:

  • Solution #1: Buffered Ringers
  • Solution #2: Solution #1+Amiloride
  • Solution #3: Buffered Zero Chloride Solution + Amiloride
  • Solution #4: Solution #3 + Isoproterenol
  • Solution #5: Solution #4 + Adenosine 5'-Triphosphate-Disodium salt (ATP)

The Cystic Fibrosis Therapeutics Development Network (TDN) is a formal affiliation of CF Research Centers in the US. Two Standard Operating Procedures have been developed by the TDN for the NPD procedure and qualification of those performing the measurement.

Procedure Details:

Briefly, a series of stopcocks is configured to allow perfusion of the above solutions through the port at the tip of an exploring catheter (PE50 tubing. All test solutions are perfused at a rate of 5.0 cc per minute. In each nostril, the PD readings in Ringer's at 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2, and 3 cm (lumen negative) are averaged and taken as the average 'baseline' PD. The catheter tip is then placed at the most negative PD site and maintained for superperfusion measurements with a small piece of tape applied to the nasal tip (to hold the catheter for the duration of the protocol). All solutions are warmed to 37˚C prior to contact with the nasal mucosa.

For each perfusion condition, a steady-state recording is obtained. The recording lasts at least one minute (for Solution #1) and for three minutes (for Solutions #2, 3, and 4) prior to proceeding to the next solution within the sequence. Solution #5 is perfused for a minimum of one minute, and confirms retention of ATP-activated Clˉ secretion in both CF and non-CF individuals. Several readings are obtained for data analysis, and then all nasal P.D. tracings are scored by investigators.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

27

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All ethnic groups accepted
  • Individuals with borderline or normal sweat chloride, one or no identified CFTR mutations and a clinical history suggestive of CF.
  • Children less than 6-8 years of age may be unable to cooperate (hold still) for the procedure, or be frightened by the procedure. Sedation may be necessary for performance of the procedure on a young child

Exclusion Criteria:

  • n/a

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
OTHER: Subjects being evaluated for CF
Subjects will be referred from physicians who are clinically concerned about the possibility of Cystic Fibrosis. Nasal potential difference measurement will be obtained to potentially help aid in diagnosis.
Nasal potential difference measurement involves dripping small amounts of 5 test solutions into the anterior nostril. This is designed to test the ability of the cells to regulate the movement of salt and water in people with features of CF in whom the diagnosis is not entirely clear.
Other Names:
  • NPD

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The basis of analysis will be the NPD response patterns, which will be interpreted and classified by the PI, as consistent or inconsistent with the diagnosis of CF based on comparison with published standards.
Time Frame: Every visit
Every visit

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2003

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 18, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 18, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 27, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 9, 2008

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 10, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

January 29, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 27, 2020

Last Verified

January 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cystic Fibrosis

Clinical Trials on Nasal potential difference measurement

Subscribe