- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00607373
Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of ISIS 301012 (Mipomersen) in Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia (RADICHOL 1)
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Mipomersen as Add-on Therapy in Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia Subjects
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of mipomersen (ISIS 301012) in subjects with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia on lipid-lowering therapy.
This study consisted of a 26-week treatment period and a 24-week post-treatment follow-up period. Following treatment and Week 28 evaluations, participants could elect to enroll in an open-label extension study (301012-CS6; NCT00694109). Participants who were not eligible or elected not to enroll in the open-label extension study or who discontinued during the 28-week treatment period were followed in this study for 24 weeks from administration of the last dose of study drug.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
- Metabolic Diseases
- Congenital Abnormalities
- Infant, Newborn, Diseases
- Genetic Diseases, Inborn
- Dyslipidemias
- Metabolism, Inborn Errors
- Lipid Metabolism Disorders
- Hypercholesterolemia
- Hyperlipidemias
- Hyperlipoproteinemias
- Lipid Metabolism, Inborn Errors
- Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II
- Metabolic Disorder
- Hypercholesterolemia, Autosomal Dominant
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an autosomal dominant genetic disorder of lipoprotein metabolism characterized by markedly elevated low density lipoprotein (LDL), premature onset of atherosclerosis and development of xanthomata. Patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) have a severe disease that presents in childhood with total cholesterol typically in the 650 to 1000 mg/dL range.
This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, which consisted of a 4-week screening period, 26 weeks of treatment, and a 24-week post- treatment follow-up period (with the exception of patients who enrolled in the open-label extension study, Study 301012-CS6; NCT00694109). Eligible patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive 200 mg mipomersen or matching volume placebo subcutaneous (SC) injections weekly. Patients who weighed <50 kg received a lower dose of 160 mg mipomersen or matching volume of placebo SC injections weekly. Patients were to have been on a stable (>=12 weeks) regimen of allowed lipid-lowering therapies at screening, and were required to remain on the same dose and regimen throughout the study.
Patients returned to the study center for clinical evaluation every other week during the first 4 weeks of treatment, once every 4 to 5 weeks for the remainder of the treatment period, and monthly during the post-treatment evaluation (follow-up) period. The primary endpoint assessment was at Week 28. Following treatment and Week 28 evaluations, eligible patients who tolerated the study drug could elect to enroll in the open-label extension study (Study 301012-CS6; NCT00694109). Patients who did not participate in the open-label extension study were required to return to the study center for clinical evaluation at least twice during the post-treatment follow-up period, including an end-of-study termination visit at the end of this 24-week period.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
SP
-
Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil, 05403-000
-
-
-
-
Quebec
-
Chicoutimi, Quebec, Canada, G7H 5H6
-
Ste Foy, Quebec, Canada, G1V 4G2
-
-
-
-
-
Mistri Wing, Singapore, 168752
-
-
-
-
-
Observatory, South Africa, 7925
-
Parktown, South Africa, 2193
-
-
-
-
-
Taipei, Taiwan, 11217
-
-
-
-
-
London, United Kingdom, WC1N 3BG
-
-
-
-
North Carolina
-
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28204
-
-
Ohio
-
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45212
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia (HoFH)
- Stable lipid-lowering therapy for 12 weeks
- Stable weight for 6 weeks
- Stable low fat diet for 8 weeks
Exclusion Criteria:
- Significant health problems in the recent past including heart attack, stroke, blood disorders, cancer, or digestive problems
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Mipomersen
Participants received mipomersen 200 mg as a subcutaneous injection once a week for 26 weeks.
|
200 mg mipomersen administered once a week for 26 weeks as a 1 mL subcutaneous injection.
Subjects weighing less than 50 kg received a lower dose of 160 mg (0.8mL) mipomersen.
Other Names:
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Participants received placebo as a subcutaneous injection once a week for 26 weeks.
|
1 mL subcutaneous injection once a week for 26 weeks.
Subjects weighing less than 50 kg received 0.8 mL subcutaneous injection.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Primary Efficacy Time Point
Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
LDL-C was measured in mg/dL.
Samples were taken following an overnight fast.
For patients with triglycerides <400 mg/dL, LDL-C was obtained using Friedewald's calculation; and for patients with triglycerides >=400 mg/dL, LDL-C was directly measured by the central laboratory using ultracentrifugation.
Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments.
An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1.
If the Study Day 1 and screening LDL-C values were >12% different (relative to the maximum value), then the screening value was not used, because the Study Day 1 value represents the best estimate of the patient's condition at the beginning of study drug administration.
The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
|
LDL-C at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET)
Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Primary Efficacy Time Point
Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
Apo-B was measured in mg/dL.
Samples were taken following an overnight fast.
Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments.
An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1.
The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
|
Apo-B at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET)
Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 )
|
The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 )
|
|
Percentage Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol at Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET)
Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
Total cholesterol was measured in mg/dL.
Samples were taken following an overnight fast.
Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments.
An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1.
The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
|
Total Cholesterol at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET)
Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
|
Percentage Change From Baseline in Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET)
Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
Non-HDL-C was measured in mg/dL.
Samples were taken following an overnight fast.
Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments.
An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1.
The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
|
Non-HDL-C at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET)
Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage Change From Baseline in Triglycerides at Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET)
Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
Triglycerides were measured in mg/dL.
Samples were taken following an overnight fast.
Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments.
An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1.
The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
|
Triglycerides at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET)
Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
|
Percentage Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET)
Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
Lipoprotein(a) was measured in mg/dL.
Samples were taken following an overnight fast.
Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments.
An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1.
The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
|
Lipoprotein(a) at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET)
Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
|
Percentage Change From Baseline in Very-Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C) at Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET)
Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
VLDL-C was measured in mg/dL.
Samples were taken following an overnight fast.
Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments.
An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1.
The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
|
VLDL-C at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET)
Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
|
Change From Baseline in Ratio of Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) to High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET)
Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
LDL-C and HDL-C were measured in mg/dL.
Samples were taken following an overnight fast.
Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments.
An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1.
The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
|
Ratio of LDL-C to HDL-C at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET)
Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A1 (Apo-A1) at Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET)
Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
Apo-A1 was measured in mg/dL.
Samples were taken following an overnight fast.
Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments.
An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1.
The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
|
Apo-A1 at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET)
Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
|
Percentage Change From Baseline in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET)
Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
HDL-C was measured in mg/dL.
Samples were taken following an overnight fast.
Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments.
An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1.
The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
|
HDL-C at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET)
Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Duell PB, Santos RD, Kirwan BA, Witztum JL, Tsimikas S, Kastelein JJP. Long-term mipomersen treatment is associated with a reduction in cardiovascular events in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia. J Clin Lipidol. 2016 Jul-Aug;10(4):1011-1021. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2016.04.013. Epub 2016 May 9.
- Santos RD, Raal FJ, Catapano AL, Witztum JL, Steinhagen-Thiessen E, Tsimikas S. Mipomersen, an antisense oligonucleotide to apolipoprotein B-100, reduces lipoprotein(a) in various populations with hypercholesterolemia: results of 4 phase III trials. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2015 Mar;35(3):689-99. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.114.304549. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
- Raal FJ, Santos RD, Blom DJ, Marais AD, Charng MJ, Cromwell WC, Lachmann RH, Gaudet D, Tan JL, Chasan-Taber S, Tribble DL, Flaim JD, Crooke ST. Mipomersen, an apolipoprotein B synthesis inhibitor, for lowering of LDL cholesterol concentrations in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2010 Mar 20;375(9719):998-1006. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60284-X.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Pathologic Processes
- Disease
- Dyslipidemias
- Congenital Abnormalities
- Hypercholesterolemia
- Hyperlipidemias
- Metabolism, Inborn Errors
- Metabolic Diseases
- Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II
- Lipid Metabolism Disorders
- Genetic Diseases, Inborn
- Infant, Newborn, Diseases
- Hyperlipoproteinemias
- Lipid Metabolism, Inborn Errors
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Antimetabolites
- Anticholesteremic Agents
- Hypolipidemic Agents
- Lipid Regulating Agents
- Mipomersen
Other Study ID Numbers
- 301012CS5
- 2005-003449-15 (EudraCT Number)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.