Efficacy of Cefepime Continuous Infusion Versus an Intermittent Dosing Regimen (CEFPK/PD)

February 6, 2008 updated by: Javeriana University

Efficacy of Cefepime Continuous Infusion Versus an Intermittent Dosing Regimen in Adult Critically Ill Patients With Gram Negative Bacilli Bacteremia

To determine the efficacy of the administration of 7 to 14 days of cefepime in a continuous infusion vs an intermittent (every 8 hours) administration, in adult patients hospitalized in Bogotá with sepsis and bacteremia caused by gram negative bacilli. The outcome was the rate of clinical cure and microbiological cure after 7 and 14 days of initiation of therapy and rates of relapse after 28 days.

Hypothesis: The administration of beta lactams in continuous infusion allows a clinical or microbiological cure greater than the intermittent administration.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Antioquia
      • Rionegro, Antioquia, Colombia
        • Hospital San Juan de Dios
    • DC
      • Bogota, DC, Colombia, 6
        • Clínica Palermo
      • Bogota, DC, Colombia, 6
        • Fundacion San Carlos
      • Bogota, DC, Colombia, 6
        • Hospital Santa Clara
      • Bogota, DC, Colombia, 6
        • Hospital Simon Bolivar
      • Bogota, DC, Colombia, 6
        • Hospital Universitario San Ignacio
    • Risaralda
      • Pareira, Risaralda, Colombia
        • Hospital San Jorge

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with sepsis, severe sepsis o septic shock diagnosis hospitalized in Intensive care Unit.
  • Presence or suspect of Gram negative bacilli bacteremia
  • To be possible the follow up according to planned visits
  • Patients should be venous access to administrate the antibiotic
  • Patients, whom the physicians consider cefepime like election treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a high degree of immunosuppression defined by:

    • The presence of neutropenia (Neutrophils count less than 500 cells/mL, or Infection with HIV-AIDS with count of less than 50 CD4 cells/mL, or chronic Administration of immunosuppressive drugs (prednisone more than 5 mg/per day, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil, etc.)
  • Patients with chronic renal failure.
  • Pregnant female patients
  • Patients in whom to approach the doctor is considered with a high probability of dying in the next 48 hours (e.g. multiorgan system failure with more than 5 organs engaged according to the criteria of MarshalL et al. or shock irreversible.
  • Patients with chronic infections as osteomyelitis or have prosthesis that would perpetuate the infection and requiring the administration of antibiotics for an extended time (including Endocarditis). -Patients with mixed infections that include Gram positive microorganisms or fungal infections.
  • -Patients who have received in the past 30 days cefepime.
  • Patients with presence of a gram negative bacillus resistant to cefepime. -Patients who are not able to identify them a bacillus gram negative.
  • Patients who they are not able to confirm the antibiotic susceptibility of gram negative bacillus. -Patients with concomitant with antimicrobial activity for Gram negative bacilli (e.g. fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides, etc.)
  • Patients who have known hypersensitivity to B lactams or cefepime

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: I
Administration of cefepime in continuous infusion (3 Gr over 24 hours) for at least 7 days and no more than 14 days days at the discretion of the investigator. Administration of saline solution 0.9%, 50-100 mL over 30 minutes every 8 hours.
Administration of cefepime in continuous infusion (3 Gr over 24 hours) for 7-14 days at the discretion of the investigator. Administration of saline solution 0.9%, 50-100 mL over 30 minutes every 8 hours.
Other Names:
  • maxipime
Administration of cefepime in intermittent infusion (1 Gr over 30 minutes every 8 hours) for 7-14 days at the discretion of the investigator.Administration of saline solution 0.9%, 50-250 mL over 24 hours
Other Names:
  • Maxipime
Active Comparator: II
Administration of cefepime in intermittent infusion (1 Gr over 30 minutes every 8 hours) for at least 7 days and no more than 14 days days at the discretion of the investigator.Administration of saline solution 0.9%, 50-250 mL over 24 hours
Administration of cefepime in continuous infusion (3 Gr over 24 hours) for 7-14 days at the discretion of the investigator. Administration of saline solution 0.9%, 50-100 mL over 30 minutes every 8 hours.
Other Names:
  • maxipime
Administration of cefepime in intermittent infusion (1 Gr over 30 minutes every 8 hours) for 7-14 days at the discretion of the investigator.Administration of saline solution 0.9%, 50-250 mL over 24 hours
Other Names:
  • Maxipime

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To evaluate global mortality rate
Time Frame: 28 days
28 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
to evaluate clinical and/or microbiologic relapses
Time Frame: 28 days
28 days
To evaluate clinical and bacteriological response
Time Frame: 3 days
3 days
to evaluate clinical and bacteriological response
Time Frame: 7 days
7 days
to evaluate clinical and bacteriological response
Time Frame: 14 days
14 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: carlos A Alvarez, MD, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
  • Study Chair: Alvaro Ruiz, MD; MSc, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
  • Study Chair: Fabian GIL, Msc, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2007

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2007

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 24, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

February 7, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 7, 2008

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2008

Last Verified

January 1, 2008

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sepsis

Clinical Trials on cefepime

3
Subscribe