Efficacy and Safety Study Comparing Lorazepam and Diazepam for Children in the Emergency Department With Seizures (Status 2)

Use Of Lorazepam For The Treatment Of Pediatric Status Epilepticus: A Randomized, Double-Blinded Trial Of Lorazepam And Diazepam

Children with seizures are frequently seen in the emergency department. The drug lorazepam, which is commonly used, is not labeled by the US Food and Drug Administration for children for this use. The FDA, under the Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act, has requested that a study comparing diazepam, a drug that is labeled by the FDA for this indication, with lorazepam be performed. The study will show whether one drug is more effective and safe than the other.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Textbooks and expert opinion recommend both diazepam and lorazepam as initial therapy for children in status epilepticus (SE) and provide recommended doses that are commonly used. However, unlike diazepam, lorazepam is only FDA-approved for treatment for SE in patients over 18 years of age. Despite this fact, many experts support the use of lorazepam over diazepam in pediatric SE. Increased duration of action, increased effectiveness in terminating SE, and a lower incidence of respiratory depression have been cited as potential advantages of lorazepam over diazepam. However, data to support firm recommendations for one medication over another are lacking. Thus, either diazepam (FDA-approved) or lorazepam can be considered first-line agents for pediatric SE, and the physician's choice of agent depends on local practice patterns and individual treatment styles. In the prehospital (Emergency Medical Services) setting, diazepam is commonly chosen because of a longer shelf life without refrigeration.

The purpose of this study is to determine the differences in efficacy and safety between these two commonly used benzodiazepines, as requested by the FDA under the Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act, using the Exception from Informed Consent provided by the FDA.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

259

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alberta
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T3B6A8
        • Alberta Children's Hospital
    • Ontario
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1H8L1
        • Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
    • California
      • Davis, California, United States, 95817
        • University of California- Davis Medical Center
    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • Children's Hospital Colorado
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington DC, District of Columbia, United States, 20010
        • Children's National Medical Center
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21201
        • University of Maryland Hospital for Children
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48106
        • University of Michigan Emergency Medicine Research
      • Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48201
        • Children's Hospital of Michigan
    • New York
      • Buffalo, New York, United States, 14222
        • Children's Hospital of Buffalo
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75390-9063
        • Children's Medical Center Dallas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Texas Children's Hospital
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84158
        • University of Utah Pediatric Emergency Medicine
    • Wisconsin
      • Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States, 53226
        • Medical College of Wisconsin Children's Corporate Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 months to 18 years (ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 3 months to less than 18 years;
  2. Generalized tonic clonic status epilepticus, defined as:

    1. Three or more generalized tonic clonic seizures within the last hour and currently experiencing a convulsion (i.e. the current convulsion may be the third convulsion within one hour); or
    2. Two or more generalized tonic clonic seizures in succession with no recovery of consciousness between seizures and currently experiencing a convulsion (i.e. the current convulsion may be the second convulsion without recovery of consciousness after the first convulsion); or
    3. A seizure that lasts at least 5 minutes that is either generalized tonic clonic in its entirety or starts focal and then generalizes. The seizure must be associated with loss of consciousness

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnancy;
  2. Shock prior to study drug (sustained hypotension requiring inotropic therapy);
  3. Significant dysrhythmia prior to study drug (other than sinus tachycardia);
  4. Need for emergent surgical intervention and general anesthesia for a condition present prior to study drug;
  5. Known sensitivity to benzodiazepines or known contraindication to benzodiazepine use; or
  6. Use of a benzodiazepine within 1 week of presentation.

Certain exclusion criteria may not be known at the time of drug administration due to the need for emergent treatment. Thus patients will be terminated from the study (early terminators) if the investigators discover any of the following conditions after administration of study drug:

  1. Pregnancy;
  2. Use of a benzodiazepine within 1 week of presentation.
  3. Parent/guardian refusal to give informed consent by the methods described;
  4. Patient's refusal to assent (for patients ≥ 7 yrs old and mentally competent to understand study procedures) by the methods described, or as required by the local IRB;

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Cohort 1

Cohort 1 (preconsented) patients will involve obtaining informed consent from the legally authorized representative of a potential study subject before they present to the ED in SE. Patient assent will be obtained for patients as per local IRB rules. The consent document (enclosed in this application) will inform parents that if their child comes to the ED and qualifies for the study based on study inclusion/exclusion criteria, they will be enrolled.

Patients who cannot be contacted to confirm consent will be enrolled in Cohort 2 (EFIC) as detailed below.

Patients in Cohort 1 will be randomized in a blinded fashion to either lorazepam 0.1 mg/kg or diazepam 0.2 mg/kg

Administration instructions will ask to deliver 0.04 ml per kilogram of child's weight of the study medication up to a maximum of 1.6 ml. 0.04 ml/kg (maximum dose 1.6 ml) will deliver 0.1 mg/kg of lorazepam (maximum dose 4 mg) and 0.2 mg/kg of diazepam (maximum dose 8 mg). Half of this dose can be repeated in 5 minutes if the patient is still convulsing.

The medication will be administered as a slow IV push.

Other Names:
  • Ativan
  • Valium
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Cohort 2

Cohort 2 (EFIC) will include patients who appear in the ED with SE and qualify for the study but have not given prior consent. These patients will be enrolled under the EFIC regulations. The parent/guardian will be given the opportunity to object to participation or ask additional questions.

The child will be enrolled (dosed) with study medication under an EFIC. Once the child is stabilized, a research staff member will approach the parent or LAR to obtain informed consent to continue the child's participation in the study. If a parent or LAR refuses continued participation, then no further study procedures will be performed. Safety and data will be collected in accordance with federal regulations.

Cohort 2 will be randomized, like Cohort 1, to either lorazepam 0.1 mg/kg or diazepam 0.2 mg/kg

Administration instructions will ask to deliver 0.04 ml per kilogram of child's weight of the study medication up to a maximum of 1.6 ml. 0.04 ml/kg (maximum dose 1.6 ml) will deliver 0.1 mg/kg of lorazepam (maximum dose 4 mg) and 0.2 mg/kg of diazepam (maximum dose 8 mg). Half of this dose can be repeated in 5 minutes if the patient is still convulsing.

The medication will be administered as a slow IV push.

Other Names:
  • Ativan
  • Valium

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
cessation of convulsions within 10 minutes of the initial administration of the study drug and a sustained absence of convulsions for 30 minutes from the initial administration of the study drug.
Time Frame: 30 minutes
30 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To determine population pharmacokinetics (PK) of lorazepam using sparse sampling.
Time Frame: 24 hr
24 hr
feasibility of identifying patients for informed consent prior to arrival in status epilepticus for a randomized controlled trial
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
the experience of community consultation and public disclosure
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
feasibility of enrolling pediatric patients under an exception from informed consent
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
determine patients' and parents' attitudes and reactions to an exception from informed consent approach
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
severe or life-threatening respiratory depression
Time Frame: 4 hours
4 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2008

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2012

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 20, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2008

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

February 22, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

December 18, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 14, 2012

Last Verified

July 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Status Epilepticus

Clinical Trials on lorazepam or diazepam

3
Subscribe