Randomized Trial of Interrupted Versus Continuous Vaginal Closure of Anterior Repair With Mesh

March 17, 2009 updated by: Brigham and Women's Hospital
Vaginal prolapse is a common condition that is treated with surgical correction. Recently surgeons have been using mesh to augment the repair of vaginal prolapse. Common complications of this surgery include vaginal pain, pain during sex, infection or erosion of the mesh in the vagina. There are different ways to close the vaginal wall over the mesh used in these procedures. Currently, there is no accepted standard method of closing the vaginal wall. The purpose of this study is to find out the best way to close the surgical wound in the vagina. We will compare interrupted closure (separate stitches) to continuous closure (one long, running stitch). We hope to show in our study that one method of closure is better than the other.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

350

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Scheduled for surgery to correct anterior vaginal prolapse with mesh kit

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 1
Interrupted vaginal closure
Horizontal mattress closure of vaginal mucosa over mesh
Active Comparator: 2
Continuous vaginal closure
Running closure of vaginal mucosa over mesh

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Mesh exposure
Time Frame: One year
One year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Pain
Time Frame: One year
One year
Dyspareunia
Time Frame: One year
One year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Danielle Patterson, MD, Brigham and Women's Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 8, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

May 12, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 19, 2009

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2009

Last Verified

March 1, 2009

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2007p002015

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Interrupted vaginal closure

3
Subscribe