Veterans Walk to Beat Back Pain

April 6, 2015 updated by: US Department of Veterans Affairs
The objective of this study was to assess whether an Internet-mediated pedometer based intervention would increase walking and improve function among individuals with chronic back pain.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Project Background/Rationale: Chronic pain, and especially back pain, is common among VA patients, affecting approximately 60% of veterans using VA primary care services. Chronic pain is associated with increased disability, poorer health status, anxiety and depression, decreased quality of life, decreased employment and increased health services use and costs. Current evidence suggests that exercise is one of the most effective strategies for managing chronic pain. However, there are few clinical programs that use generally available tools and a relatively low cost approach to help patients with chronic back pain initiate and maintain an exercise program.

Project Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of an Internet-mediated pedometer based intervention that was designed to increase walking and improve pain-related function among individuals with chronic back pain. The Specific Aims of this randomized, controlled trial were: 1) To determine whether an internet-mediated pedometer based intervention will reduce pain-related functional interference among patients with chronic back pain in the short term and over a 12-month timeframe; 2) To assess the effect of the intervention on walking (measured by step counts), quality of life, pain intensity, pain related fear and self-efficacy for exercise among patients with chronic back pain; and 3) To identify factors associated with a sustained increase in walking over a 12-month timeframe among patients randomized to the intervention.

Project Methods: We conducted a randomized controlled trial of an Internet-mediated, pedometer based intervention to promote walking and improve pain-related function among patients with chronic back pain compared to enhanced usual care. Participants were followed for 12 months to investigate the efficacy of the intervention in assisting patients with initiating and maintaining a regular walking program and improving pain-related function. We recruited patients with chronic back pain (primarily low back pain) receiving care at one VA health care system. Study patients were randomized to one of two groups: 1) enhanced usual care or 2) the Internet-mediated, pedometer based intervention. All participants attended an educational program designed specifically for individuals with chronic back pain. Study participants randomized to the intervention were given an enhanced pedometer and access to a study website that provided step goals and feedback, tailored motivational messages and an e-community. Those in the control group received a pedometer but did not have access to the website. Both groups completed on-line survey assessments at baseline, 6, and 12 months and were asked to report adverse events on a regular basis. The primary outcome for this study was pain-related functional interference. Secondary outcomes included average daily steps at 12 months as measured using the study pedometer, health related quality of life, pain intensity, pain related fear and self-efficacy for exercise. The analysis was conducted based on intention to treat principles and used multivariable modeling procedures to determine the effect of the intervention on our outcomes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

229

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48105
        • VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Veterans receiving care at the VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System
  • Have back pain that has persisted for more than 3 months
  • Have a sedentary lifestyle (less than 150 minutes of physical activity per week)
  • Have access to a computer (with Windows XP or Vista) on at least a weekly basis with an available USB port and Internet access
  • Have a working e-mail address
  • Are competent to provide written informed consent
  • Are able to communicate in English
  • Are not institutionalized
  • Can identify a health care provider who can provide medical clearance.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Currently pregnant
  • Cannot walk at least one block
  • Cannot obtain written clearance to start a walking program from a treating healthcare provider

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Education and Standard Care
Received standard care and participated in an educational program for individuals with chronic back pain. Also received an uploading pedometer but no feedback or goals about their walking activity.
Educational program for individuals with chronic back pain.
EXPERIMENTAL: Internet Mediated Enhanced Pedometer
In addition to standard care and participating in an educational program, participants received an enhanced pedometer for uploading step information, e-mail messages with weekly step goals and access to a website that provided step goals and feedback, tailored motivational messages and on on-line community for communication asynchronously with staff and other participants.
Educational program for individuals with chronic back pain.
Enhanced pedometer for uploading step information and website that provides step goals and feedback, tailored motivational messages and an online community.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ) Score
Time Frame: 12 months
The Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire score ranges from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating greater disability
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2009

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2012

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 28, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 6, 2008

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

June 10, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

April 27, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 6, 2015

Last Verified

September 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IIR 07-177

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Back Pain

Clinical Trials on Education and standard care

Subscribe