Development of a Screening Strategy for Community-based Adverse Drug Related Events in the Emergency Department

February 15, 2011 updated by: University of British Columbia
Adverse Drug Related Events (ADREs) are a leading cause of Emergency Department (ED) visits in Canada. However emergency physicians recognize only half of all ADREs in patients presenting to the ED, missing opportunities to intervene. The objective of this study is to develop a screening strategy that identifies patients with ADREs. Our hypothesis is that the development of a user-friendly, reliable screening strategy for ADREs in patients presenting to the ED is feasible. We believe that this will lead to improved patient care.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Background Between 9250 and 23,750 Canadians die each year because of preventable adverse events related to medical care. ADREs account for 50% of all preventable adverse events and cause up to 12% of ED visits. Unfortunately, emergency physicians recognize only half of all ADREs, missing crucial opportunities to intervene.

Objective The objective of this study is to derive a clinical decision rule that accurately stratifies patients presenting to the ED into risk categories for drug-related morbidity. This instrument will allow early identification of clinically significant ADREs allowing rational referral for medication optimization, treatment of ADREs and prevention of future events.

Hypothesis The development of a rapid, user-friendly reliable clinical decision rule for ADREs in patients presenting to the ED is feasible.

Methodology This prospective observational study will evaluate predictor variables (from the history, physical examination and laboratory tests) for ADREs in a representative sample of ED patients using standardized assessments by emergency nurses and physicians. Inter-rater agreement of predictor variables will be measured, and clinical pharmacists, blinded to the nursing and physician assessments, will use a standardized, validated algorithm to identify ADREs. Recursive partitioning and/or logistic regression analysis will be used to determine the optimal combination of predictor variables to detect the presence of an ADRE. We will report diagnostic test characteristics of the derived clinical decision rule. Validation of the clinical decision rule is planned in a future study.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

1588

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5Z 1M9
        • Emergency Department, Vancouver General Hospital
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6Z 1Y6
        • Emergency Department, St Paul's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Adults presenting to the emergency departments of participating institutions who have used at least one prescription or over-the-counter medication in the 2 weeks prior to presentation.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults over the age of 19 years
  • Reported having used at least one prescription or over-the-counter medication in the 2 weeks prior to presentation
  • Speak English and/or translator available at the time of presentation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients previously enrolled
  • Patients transferred directly to an admitting service.
  • Patients who leave prior to being seen or against medical advice.
  • Patients returning to the ED for a scheduled revisit.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Corinne M. Hohl, University of British Columbia
  • Study Chair: Jeffrey R. Brubacher, University of British Columbia
  • Study Director: Samuel B. Sheps, University of British Columbia
  • Study Director: Linda Dempster, University of British Columbia
  • Study Director: Garth Hunt, University of British Columbia
  • Study Director: Claude Stang, University of British Columbia
  • Study Director: Janet Joy, University of British Columbia
  • Study Director: Peter Loewen, University of British Columbia
  • Study Director: Matthew Wiens, University of British Columbia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 30, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 30, 2008

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

August 4, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

February 17, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 15, 2011

Last Verified

February 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Adverse Drug Related Events

3
Subscribe