Combined Role of Position Emission Tomography (PET) and Magnetoencephalography (MEG) in Nonlesional Epilepsy

May 12, 2014 updated by: Amer Shammas, The Hospital for Sick Children

Combined Role of PET and MEG in Nonlesional Epilepsy in Pediatric Population

The first aim of this study are to evaluate the lobar concordance of FDG-PET and MEG with intracranial electrographic study in children with intractable partial epilepsy. The second aim is to determine if the combined role of FDG-PET and MEG improve detection of epileptogenic zone as defined by invasive intracranial recordings.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Children with poorly controlled epilepsy are extensively investigated with various tools including MR brain, electroencephalography (EEG), magnetoencephalography (MEG) or position emission tomography (PET) scans. When MR brain does not show an abnormality, the patient is said to have nonlesional epilepsy. In these cases, it is even more crucial to be able to identify the epileptogenic zone, depending on availability of investigative tool.

Recognizing that individual modalities have limitations, the aim of this study is to determine if combining non-invasive investigations with MEG and PET, which respectively evaluate the electrical and metabolic activity of the brain, could improve the children with intractable nonlesional epilepsy with MEG and PET and compared this with invasive intracranial monitoring. The endpoint of the study being agreement on localizations of epileptogenic zone using PET and MEG individually and in combination and comparing this with invasive intracranial monitoring.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

59

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada
        • The Hospital for Sick Children

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 14 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children between the ages 0-18 years with (1) nonlesional intractable focal epilepsy and (2) those with discordant clinical and EEG findings, who are potential surgical candidates

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are pregnant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1
MEG studies are performed using a whole-head Omega 151-channel gradiometer system.
An interictal FDG(fluoro-D-glucose)-PET will be obtained in a single 10 minute scanning session. PET scans will be obtained using a 3D acquisition technique, which will allow the use of a lower dose of radiotracer.
MR will be performed on a 1.5T or 3T system, using a combination of different sequences including sagittal T1, coronal and axial T2, FLAIR and proton density and axial 3D T1 weighted images.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The concordance rate of FDG-PET and MEG with video EEG
Time Frame: 3 years
3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The positive and negative predictive values of each modality and combined modalities in assessing the epileptogenic zone.
Time Frame: 3 years
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Martin Charron, MD, The Hospital for Sick Children

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 25, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 25, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

August 26, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 13, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 12, 2014

Last Verified

May 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe