Study of New Implantable Loop Recorder

January 28, 2019 updated by: Abbott Medical Devices

Confirm Implantable Cardiac Monitor Study

The goal of this IDE clinical study is to evaluate the quality of the cardiac signal recordings obtained by the St. Jude Medical (SJM) Confirm Implantable Cardiac Monitor (device).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

75

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alaska
      • Anchorage, Alaska, United States, 99508
        • Alaska Heart Institute
    • Arizona
      • Scottsdale, Arizona, United States, 85251
        • Arizona Arrhythmia Research
    • Arkansas
      • Little Rock, Arkansas, United States, 72211
        • Arkansas Heart Hospital
    • California
      • Fullerton, California, United States, 92835-2605
        • St. Jude Hospital
      • La Jolla, California, United States, 92037
        • Scripps Clinic
    • Oklahoma
      • Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States, 74104
        • Oklahoma Heart Institute at Utica
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97225
        • Providence- St Vincent Medical Center
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78705
        • Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Research Foundation
    • Virginia
      • Charlottesville, Virginia, United States, 22980
        • University of Virginia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have clinical syndromes or situations at increased risk of cardiac arrhythmias
  • Patients who experience transient symptoms that may suggest a cardiac arrhythmia
  • Patients who have been previously diagnosed with atrial fibrillation
  • Patients who are suspected to have Atrial Fibrillation (AF) but AF has not been documented
  • Patients who have provided written informed consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are under the age of 18 years
  • Patients who have a life expectancy less than 1 year
  • Patients who are unable to comply with the follow-up schedule
  • Patients who are currently implanted with a pacemaker or defibrillator
  • Patients who the physician deems inappropriate for the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Open Label
SJM Confirm Device
All patients in this study will receive the SJM Confirm device.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity for R Waves During In-Clinic Recordings at Rest
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The sensitivity was calculated for each recording and for each subject.
6 weeks
Sensitivity for R Waves During In-Clinic Recordings During Treadmill Exercise
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The sensitivity for R waves during the in-clinic recordings was was calculated for each recording and for each subject.
6 weeks
Sensitivity for R Waves During In-Clinic Recordings During Hand to Hand/Shoulder Maneuvers
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The sensitivity for R waves during the in-clinic recordings was was calculated for each recording and for each subject.
6 weeks
Positive Predictive Value (PPV) for In-Clinic Recordings at Rest
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The positive predictive value (PPV) for the in-clinic recording was calculated for each recording and for each subject.
6 weeks
Positive Predictive Value (PPV) for In-Clinic Recordings During Treadmill Stress Test
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The positive predictive value (PPV) for the in-clinic recording was calculated for each recording and for each subject.
6 weeks
Positive Predictive Value (PPV) During Hand to Hand/Shoulder Maneuvers
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The positive predictive value (PPV) for the in-clinic recording was was calculated for each recording and for each subject.
6 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Interpretability of Weekly Subject Activator Recordings
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The proportion of recording time during which the device recording was interpretable was calculated for each weekly Patient Activator recording and for each subject. A random effects model was fitted to the data.
6 weeks
Interpretability of Automatically Triggered/Symptom Driven Recordings
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The proportion of recording time during which the device recording was interpretable for each automatically triggered/symptom driven recording and for each subject.
6 weeks
Inappropriateness of Automatically Triggered Recordings - Phase I
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The proportion of automatically triggered recordings that were inappropriate (i.e. noise triggered)was calculated and reported using a generalized estimating equation (GEE) model for binomial outcomes to account for multiple recordings per patient.
6 weeks
Inappropriateness of Automatically Triggered Recordings - Phase II
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The proportion of automatically triggered recordings that were inappropriate (i.e. noise triggered)was calculated and reported using a GEE model for binomial outcomes to account for multiple recordings per patient.
6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Tamara Shipman, Abbott Medical Devices

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 2, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 3, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

September 4, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 30, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2019

Last Verified

January 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Syncope

Clinical Trials on SJM Confirm

3
Subscribe