- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00929474
BOOST - Benefit of Frequent Optimization After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Device Replacement
January 31, 2019 updated by: Abbott Medical Devices
BOOST: Benefit of Frequent Optimization After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Device Replacement
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has shown improvement in mortality and morbidity in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and congestive heart failure.
Additionally in CRT patients it has been demonstrated that optimizing paced/sensed atrioventricular (AV) and interventricular (V-V) timings leads to immediate hemodynamic benefits and further improves cardiac function.
Recent studies have shown that optimal paced/sensed AV and V-V delays change over time, which raises the question of how often optimization should be repeated.
Thus, frequent re-optimization of these delays might be beneficial for maintaining significant improvement of cardiac function.
However, it remains to be evaluated whether timing optimization may be beneficial on patients who have received CRT for a number of years and are now having the CRT device replaced.
Study Overview
Status
Terminated
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
- This is a prospective, randomized, and multicenter study
- Patients who have received a replacement St. Jude Medical(SJM) CRT device, either CRT-P or CRT-D, within the last two weeks post CRT replacement will be considered for enrollment in the study.
- Baseline measurements will be performed at the time of enrollment.
- Patients are followed up to 12 months post CRT replacement with data collected at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post CRT replacement.
- Patients will be randomized at enrollment to either Group 1 (use of SJM algorithm to optimize programming) or Group 2 ("Control").
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
17
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Colorado
-
Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
- University of Colorado Hospital
-
-
Mississippi
-
Hattiesburg, Mississippi, United States, 39401
- Hattiesburg Clinic, P.A./Southern Heart Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient underwent a CRT replacement within the last two weeks, triggered by either the elective replacement indicator (ERI)/end of life (EOL), or by receiving a CRT-D device as an upgrade from a CRT-P device.
- Patient has received an FDA approved SJM CRT device as a replacement to the old CRT device within the last two weeks.
- Patient has the ability to complete a 6-minute hall walk without any assistance.
- Patient is willing to provide written informed consent.
- Patient has the ability to independently comprehend and complete a QOL questionnaire.
- Patient is geographically stable and is willing to comply with the required follow-up schedule.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient had paced/sensed AV and/or V-V delay optimization using QuickOpt before CRT replacement.
- Patient had any paced/sensed AV and/or V-V delay optimization within 3 months before CRT replacement.
- Patient has an ability to walk ≥ 450 meters (≥ 1476 feet) in 6 minutes.
- Adequate patient's echocardiography/Doppler images will not be available.
- Patient is expected to receive a heart transplant during the duration of the study.
- Patient has an epicardial ventricular lead system (Active or Inactive).
- Patient has limited intrinsic atrial activity (≤ 40 bpm).
- Patient has persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation (AF).
- Patient has 2° or 3° heart block.
- Patient's life expectancy is less than 1 year.
- Patient is less than 18 years old.
- Patient is pregnant.
- Patient is on IV inotropic agents 1 month prior to CRT replacement.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Control
|
The patient's device is programmed to either simultaneous or sequential Bi-V pacing mode as per physician's discretion.
The paced/sensed AV and V-V delays could be programmed empirically or optimized using any non-intracardiac electrogram (IEGM) based method as per sites standard of care.
However, the Group 2 patients can be optimized only once within the first 4 weeks post CRT replacement.
Any paced/sensed AV and V-V delay optimizations performed after 4 weeks post CRT replacement in Group 2 patients will be considered a protocol deviation.
|
|
Experimental: QuickOpt
|
The patient's device is programmed to sequential Bi-V pacing mode with paced/sensed AV and V-V delays optimized using QuickOpt.
For Group 1 patients, optimization using QuickOpt is performed at enrollment, 3, 6, 9 and 12 month visits.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Stroke Volume (SV) Measured by Aortic Velocity Time Integral (AoVTI)
Time Frame: 12 months
|
The BOOST study is prematurely terminated so there were no enough numbers of patients to have a meaningful measurement.
|
12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
June 1, 2009
Primary Completion (Actual)
September 1, 2010
Study Completion (Actual)
September 1, 2010
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
June 25, 2009
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 26, 2009
First Posted (Estimate)
June 29, 2009
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
February 4, 2019
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 31, 2019
Last Verified
January 1, 2019
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CRD466
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Heart Failure
-
Indiana UniversityRecruitingCongestive Heart Failure | Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) | Congestive Heart Failure Chronic | Congestive Heart Failure(CHF)United States
-
University of Health Sciences LahoreRecruitingAcute Decompensated Heart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, SystolicPakistan
-
Tufts Medical CenterMetro West Medical CenterCompletedCongestive Heart Failure | Diastolic Heart Failure | Systolic Heart FailureUnited States
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompletedHeart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, Systolic | Heart Failure NYHA Class II | Heart Failure NYHA Class III | Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure NYHA Class IV | Heart Failure With Normal Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure; With Decompensation | Heart Failure...United States, Canada
-
Manipal UniversityUnknownHeart Failure | Decompensated Heart Failure | Acute Heart Failure | Diastolic Heart Failure | Systolic Heart FailureIndia
-
Lakeland Regional Health Systems, Inc.RecruitingHeart Failure | Heart Failure Acute | Acute Heart Failure (AHF) | Heart Failure - NYHA II - IVUnited States
-
VA Eastern Colorado Health Care SystemNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedHeart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, Systolic | Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure; With Decompensation | Heart Failure,Congestive | Heart Failure AcuteUnited States
-
Eli Lilly and CompanyNot yet recruitingHeart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, SystolicUnited States, Japan
-
Wake Forest UniversityCompletedHeart Failure, Congestive | Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
-
Wake Forest UniversityNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedHeart Failure, Congestive | Diastolic Heart FailureUnited States
Clinical Trials on QuickOpt - SJM CRT (Group 1)
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompletedBradycardia | TachycardiaAustralia, India
-
The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical...Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital; West China Hospital; Shanghai Tong Ren Hospital; Guangdong... and other collaboratorsRecruitingHeart Failure | Intraventricular BlockChina
-
Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy...Unknown
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompletedThe Patient Meets ACC/AHA/ESC Guidelines for Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) or Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT-D) DeviceUnited Kingdom, Germany
-
Manhattan Psychiatric CenterNathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric ResearchCompletedSchizophreniaUnited States
-
Michele BrignoleCompleted
-
Fujian Cancer HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
Oregon Research InstituteCompletedSubstance Use Disorders | Treatment RefusalUnited States
-
Shanghai Zhongshan HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
Shandong Cancer Hospital and InstituteRecruitingBone Metastases in Subjects With Advanced CancerChina