Erlotinib Hydrochloride in Treating Patients With Stage I-III Colorectal Cancer or Adenoma

December 22, 2014 updated by: National Cancer Institute (NCI)

A Phase IIa Randomized, Double-Blind Trial of Erlotinib in Inhibiting EGF Receptor Signaling in Aberrant Crypt Foci of the Colon

This randomized phase II trial is studying how well erlotinib hydrochloride works in treating patients with stage I-III colorectal cancer or adenoma. Erlotinib hydrochloride may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth and by blocking blood flow to the tumor. Erlotinib hydrochloride may also stop tumors from growing or coming back

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To test the hypothesis that erlotinib (erlotinib hydrochloride) doses as low as 25 mg will decrease aberrant crypt foci (ACF) phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinases (pERK) levels from baseline (pre) to post erlotinib treatment.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To test the hypothesis that additional epidermal growth factor (EGF) inducible biomarkers will decrease from baseline (pre) to post treatment with erlotinib 25 mg, 50 mg or 100 mg orally (PO) once daily (QD) therapy.

II. To determine the mean decrease from baseline of the ACF: normal mucosa pERK ratio pre and post 8-30 days of erlotinib.

III. To determine erlotinib concentration in plasma and colorectal tissue at 25 mg, 50 mg and 100 mg doses after 8-30 days of therapy.

IV. To determine the incidence of rash, diarrhea and other side effects of low dose erlotinib.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 treatment arms.

ARM I: Patients receive 100 mg of erlotinib hydrochloride PO and two 25 mg of placebo PO QD.

ARM II: Patients receive 50 mg of erlotinib hydrochloride PO and one 100 mg of placebo PO QD.

ARM III: Patients receive 25 mg of erlotinib hydrochloride PO and one 100 mg of placebo and one 25 mg of placebo PO QD.

In all arms, treatment continues for 8-30 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up for 4 to 9 weeks.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

45

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Long Beach, California, United States, 90822
        • VA Long Beach Healthcare System
      • Orange, California, United States, 92868
        • Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612
        • University of Illinois at Chicago

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants with one or more of the following criteria will be eligible to participate:

    • History of Stage I-III colorectal cancer, not treated in the past 6 months with no anticipated treatment in the next 3 months
    • Adenoma ≥ 1 cm in size
    • 3 or more adenomas (of any size) removed at one colonoscopy within past 6 years
    • Sessile serrated adenoma ≥ 5 mm in size
    • Adenoma (of any size) with villous features (villous, tubulovillous)
    • Adenoma (of any size) with high grade dysplasia
  • Participants are eligible for randomization into the treatment phase of the trial if they are found to have ≥ 4 ACFs at either baseline colonoscopy or baseline flexible sigmoidoscopy
  • Blood tests at screening which meet the following criteria:
  • WBC > 3000/mm^3
  • Platelets > 100,000/mm^3
  • Hemoglobin > 10g/dl
  • Plasma creatinine of < 1.6mg/dl
  • Total bilirubin < 1.5 x the upper limit of normal
  • Serum ALT < 1.5 x the upper limit of normal
  • Serum AST < 1.5 x the upper limit of normal
  • ECOG performance status 0-1
  • Women of child-bearing potential and men taking study drug must agree to use adequate contraception (hormonal or barrier method of birth control; abstinence) prior to study entry and for the duration of study participation
  • Ability to understand, as well as sign the written informed consent document
  • If a woman is of child-bearing potential, she must have a negative pregnancy test prior to study entry; should a woman become pregnant or suspect she is pregnant while participating in this study, she should inform her study physician immediately

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD)
  • History of interstitial lung disease or chronic lung disease
  • Smoking within the past 3 months
  • Increased bleeding risk from rectal biopsy (Patients receiving aspirin or plavix can be enrolled)
  • Patients receiving warfarin or coumadin
  • Uncontrollable diarrhea of any cause
  • Patients, including rectal cancer patients, that have received prior radiation to the rectum or pelvis
  • Participants taking a known significant CYP 3A4 inducer or inhibitor; known significant inducers/inhibitors include: amprenavir, aprepitant, atazanavir, carbamazepine, clarithromycin, conivaptan, diltiazem, darunavir/ritonavir, dronedarone, erythromycin, fluconazole, fosamprenavir, indinavir, itraconazole, ketoconazole, nefazodone, nelfinavir, phenytoin, posaconazole, rifampin, ritonavir, St. John's wort, saquinavir, telithromycin, tipranavir/ritonavir, verapamil, voriconazole
  • Women who are pregnant or breast-feeding
  • Active keratoconjunctivitis, or corneal surgery in the past three weeks
  • Any medical or psychosocial condition that could jeopardize the subject's participation in and compliance to the study
  • Participants who are taking any other investigational pharmaceutical agents
  • Previous history of sensitivity to erlotinib, Iressa, or Erbitux, such as a rash that is uncontrollable by topical steroids and/or antibiotics

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Erlotinib Hydrochloride (25 mg)
Patients receive 25mg of erlotinib hydrochloride PO and one 100 mg of placebo and one 25 mg of placebo PO QD.
Correlative studies
Given PO
Other Names:
  • OSI-774
  • erlotinib
  • CP-358,774
Given PO
Other Names:
  • PLCB
Experimental: Erlotinib Hydrochloride (50 mg)
Patients receive 50 mg of erlotinib hydrochloride PO and one 100 mg of placebo PO QD.
Correlative studies
Given PO
Other Names:
  • OSI-774
  • erlotinib
  • CP-358,774
Given PO
Other Names:
  • PLCB
Experimental: Erlotinib Hydrochloride (100 mg)
Patients receive 100 mg of erlotinib hydrochloride PO and two 25 mg of placebo PO QD.
Correlative studies
Given PO
Other Names:
  • OSI-774
  • erlotinib
  • CP-358,774
Given PO
Other Names:
  • PLCB

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in ACF pERK Levels
Time Frame: From baseline to post-treatment (up to 30 days)
Quantification will be performed by Western blot analysis. Tested using paired t-test with a two-sided significance level of 0.05.
From baseline to post-treatment (up to 30 days)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in EGF-inducible Markers - pEGFR in Normal Mucosa
Time Frame: From baseline to post-treatment (up to 30 days)
pEGFR expression levels were quantified by immunoblotting and calculated as the ratio of the pEGFR signals to reference signals. A log-transformation of pEGFR was utilized in primary analyses. The general linear model was used to estimate and compare the relative change in median pEGFR with adjustment for actin as a normalizing factor. The estimated relative change (post:pre) in the median, corresponding 95% confidence interval, and p-value for testing the null hypothesis of equal medians comparing pre- and post-measurements were reported.
From baseline to post-treatment (up to 30 days)
Change in EGF-inducible Markers - Total EGFR in Normal Mucosa
Time Frame: From baseline to post-treatment (up to 30 days)
Total EGFR expression levels were quantified by immunoblotting and calculated as the ratio of the total EGFR signals to reference signals. A log-transformation of total EGFR was utilized in primary analyses. The general linear model was used to estimate and compare the relative change in median total EGFR with adjustment for actin as a normalizing factor. The estimated relative change (post:pre) in the median, corresponding 95% confidence interval, and p-value for testing the null hypothesis of equal medians comparing pre- and post-measurements were reported.
From baseline to post-treatment (up to 30 days)
Change in EGF-inducible Markers - pEGFR in ACF
Time Frame: From baseline to post-treatment (up to 30 days)
pEGFR expression levels were quantified by immunoblotting and calculated as the ratio of the pEGFR signals to reference signals. A log-transformation of pEGFR was utilized in primary analyses. The general linear model was used to estimate and compare the relative change in median total EGFR with adjustment for actin as a normalizing factor. The estimated relative change (post:pre) in the median, corresponding 95% confidence interval, and p-value for testing the null hypothesis of equal medians comparing pre- and post-measurements were reported.
From baseline to post-treatment (up to 30 days)
Change in EGF-inducible Markers - Total EGFR in ACF
Time Frame: From baseline to post-treatment (up to 30 days)
Total EGFR expression levels were quantified by immunoblotting and calculated as the ratio of the total EGFR signals to reference signals. A log-transformation of total EGFR was utilized in primary analyses. The general linear model was used to estimate and compare the relative change in median total EGFR with adjustment for actin as a normalizing factor. The estimated relative change (post:pre) in the median, corresponding 95% confidence interval, and p-value for testing the null hypothesis of equal medians comparing pre- and post-measurements were reported.
From baseline to post-treatment (up to 30 days)
ACF: Normal Mucosa pERK Ratio
Time Frame: Up to day 30
Quantification will be performed by Western blot analysis. Tested using analysis of variance with subsequent pairwise comparisons using the Tukey method to adjust for multiple comparisons.
Up to day 30
Plasma Erlotinib Concentration (ng/mL)
Time Frame: Up to day 30
Will be quantified in biopsy samples using appropriate descriptive statistics (means and standard deviations).
Up to day 30
Plasma OSI-420 Concentration (ng/mL)
Time Frame: Up to day 30
Will be quantified in biopsy samples using appropriate descriptive statistics (means and standard deviations).
Up to day 30
Normal Mucosa Erlotinib Concentration (ng/mg)
Time Frame: Up to day 30
Will be quantified in biopsy samples using appropriate descriptive statistics (means and standard deviations).
Up to day 30
Normal Mucosa OSI-420 Concentration (ng/mg)
Time Frame: Up to day 30
Will be quantified in biopsy samples using appropriate descriptive statistics (means and standard deviations).
Up to day 30
Number of Participants Reported at Least 1 Side Effect During the Study
Time Frame: Up to 9 weeks
Described for each arm using frequencies. The onset of adverse events is between randomization date and off-study date.
Up to 9 weeks
Number of Participants Reported at Least 1 Rash Side Effect During the Study
Time Frame: Up to 9 weeks
Described for each arm using frequencies.
Up to 9 weeks
Number of Participants Reported at Least 1 Diarrhea Side Effect During the Study
Time Frame: Up to 9 weeks
Described for each arm using frequencies.
Up to 9 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Timothy Morgan, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 17, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 17, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

September 18, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 6, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 22, 2014

Last Verified

March 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe