Early Supported Discharge After Stroke in Bergen

February 24, 2014 updated by: Haukeland University Hospital

Early Supported Discharge After Stroke in Bergen. An RCT Looking at the Collaboration Between Hospital Service and Primary Health Care.

The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the benefit of early supported discharge (ESD) in rehabilitation of stroke patients in two different outpatient modalities.

In a collaborating study, changes in physical function as well as the patients' own perception of physical function, pain and fatigue will be studied. In further collaborating studies, health economics and organizational issues will also be evaluated.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Early supported discharge (ESD) seems to be at least as effective as hospital rehabilitation after stroke, and possibly better. In this study patients with recent stroke will be randomized to one of three different treatment arms:

  • ESD with treatment at a day institution until 4 hrs. per day for up to 5 weeks
  • ESD with treatment in the patients' home until 4 hrs. per day for up to 5 weeks
  • Rehabilitation treatment "as usual", with a longer hospital stay, but without any specific treatment or follow-up after discharge

The patients in the two ESD arms will in addition be followed closely by a multidisciplinary coordinating team during the stay in hospital and the 5 week period of treatment after discharge, and they will be offered follow-ups at 3 and 6 months after inclusion into the study.

Patients in all 3 arms will be systematically examined with a set of measuring instruments as well as objective physical and function tests. This will be performed at inclusion and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after inclusion.

In the collaborating study by physiotherapist Bente Gjelsvik a comparison between changes in trunk control, balance, walking and ADL 3 months post stroke, as well as the patients' perceptions of physical function, pain and fatigue, will be the main focus. To assess function, functional change and possible differences between different interventions, there is a need for reliable and valid outcome measures. As a basis for the use of the outcome measure Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS) in this study, the TIS has been translated into Norwegian, Trunk Impairment Scale - Norwegian version (TIS-NV) and will be examined for measurement properties using data from the above study as well as data from patients with brain damage recruited from the Department of Physical Rehabilitation Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital. An examination of a possible connection between localisation and size of the stroke and trunk control will also be performed, as characteristics of the stroke may have therapeutic implications for the choice of intervention for the individual patient. The research questions for the planned doctoral thesis for Bente Gjelsvik are therefore as follows:

  1. Is the TIS-NV reliable and valid in patients with brain damage?
  2. Are changes in trunk control, balance, walking and daily activities, as well as pain and fatigue 3 months post stroke different in patients who have received interventions from different courses of rehabilitation in the study "Early supported discharge after stroke in Bergen"? To which degree do the patients perceive problems related to balance, physical activity, walking, pain and fatigue?
  3. Is there a correlation between localization and size of the stroke as measured by magnetic tomography, and the patients' trunk control? Are initial localization and size of the stroke predictive for the patients' trunk control 3 months post stroke?

Another collaborating project is carried out by PhD candidate Hedda Døli (Language outcome after stroke: lesion location, prognosis and consequences).

The aim of her first study in the PhD project is to investigate the relationship between lesion location and aphasia severity one week post-stroke. Thereafter a follow-up study of the same patients 12 months post-stroke investigates the prognosis of aphasia and the variables that may influence recovery. In the third study the aim is to investigate the health-related quality of life and the occurrence of depression in patients with aphasia.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

306

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bergen, Norway, N-5021
        • Haukeland University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Living in own home in the community of Bergen, Norway
  • Inclusion within 1-7 days (24-168 hours) after debut of symptoms
  • Inclusion within 6-120 hours after admission to Department of Neurology
  • NIHSS score 2-26 at inclusion OR NIHSS score < 2 if Modified Rankin Scale is 2 or higher when being 0 before the stroke
  • The patient must be awake and informed consent must be given by patient or relatives

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Serious psychic illness
  • Serious drug abuse
  • Serious medical conditions that can influence the patients' cerebrovascular disease or rehabilitation
  • Poor knowledge of the Norwegian language

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Day unit rehabilitation
Discharge from the hospital to the patients' homes as soon as possible, supported by an out-patient ambulatory coordinating multidisciplinary team. The patients will be offered rehabilitation in a day unit, and multidisciplinary policlinical follow-ups will be performed 3 and 6 months after inclusion.
Treatment by physiotherapist and occupational therapist up to 4 hours a day for up to 5 weeks in a day unit
Active Comparator: Home rehabilitation
Discharge from the hospital to the patients' homes as soon as possible, supported by an out-patient ambulatory coordinating multidisciplinary team. The patients will be offered rehabilitation treatment in their homes, and multidisciplinary policlinical follow-ups will be performed 3 and 6 months after inclusion.
Treatment by physiotherapist and occupational therapist up to 4 hours a day for up to 5 weeks in the patient's home
No Intervention: Treatment as usual
Patients will receive rehabilitation treatment after today's principles and routines.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
MRS
Time Frame: 6 months
Modified Rankin Scale
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
NIHSS
Time Frame: 3, 6 and 12 months
National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale
3, 6 and 12 months
BI
Time Frame: 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Barthel ADL Index
3, 6, 12 and 24 months
AMPS
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months
Assessment of Motor and Process Skills
3 and 6 months
TIS
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months
Trunk Impairment Scale
3 and 6 months
SIS
Time Frame: 12 months
Stroke Impact Scale
12 months
RSS
Time Frame: 12 months
Relative Stress Scale
12 months
PGIC
Time Frame: 12 and 24 months
Patients' Global Impression of Change
12 and 24 months
SF-36
Time Frame: 12 and 24 months
Short Form (36) Health Survey
12 and 24 months
MRS
Time Frame: 3, 12 and 24 months
Modified Rankin Scale
3, 12 and 24 months
PASS (Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke)
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months
3 and 6 months
5mTW (5 meter Timed Walk)
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months
3 and 6 months
TUG (Timed Up and Go)
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months
3 and 6 months
NRS (Numeric Rating Scale)
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months
3 and 6 months
Norwegian Basic Test for Aphasia
Time Frame: 3 and 12 months
3 and 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Jan S. Skouen, PhD, Haukeland University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 10, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 10, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

October 13, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 25, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 24, 2014

Last Verified

February 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe