HIV Risk Reduction in Youth in the Bahamas

November 1, 2017 updated by: Bonita Stanton, Wayne State University

Adolescent Risk Reduction in the Bahamas-Peers and Parents

This study will examine whether pairing a grade 6 in-school HIV education program and a parent training program will reduce prevalence of behaviors that present high risk of HIV infection in youth in the Bahamas.

In a continuation of this study, we shall examine whether an in-school HIV prevention program delivered to grade 10 students reduces HIV risk behavior and the impact of both the grade 6 intervention and the grade 10 intervention compared to the grade 6 intervention alone.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

HIV infection in the Bahamas is the leading cause of death among Bahamians between the ages of 15 and 44. It is estimated that 4.13% of adults in the Bahamas are HIV infected, and the Bahamas has the highest annual incidence of AIDS in the English-speaking Caribbean. One cause for these high rates of infection is the prevalence of risky behaviors among Bahamian youth. Among youth between the ages of 13 and 15, 32% are sexually experienced, with that rate rising to 57% among youth age 16 or older. Approximately half of these adolescents have never used birth control, and only one third use birth control consistently.

This study will examine the benefits of combining a youth HIV prevention education program with a parental program focused on communication and monitoring. The youth education program, developed in the United States but modified to address Caribbean culture, is called Focus on Youth in the Caribbean (FOYC). FOYC has already been shown to be effective in increasing condom use, knowledge of HIV, and knowledge of risks associated with unprotected sex and drug use. Including parents in this intervention effort may broaden and sustain its effects. A study of seventh to eleventh graders found that teens were six times less likely to engage in sexual activity if they thought their mothers disapproved of it. The study also found that teens often did not have a clear idea of what their parents approved of or disapproved of, indicating a need for better communication between parents and children. Other studies have shown that parents who monitor their children reduce the likelihood that those children have unprotected sex or use drugs. The parental intervention program, called Caribbean Informed Parents and Children Together (CImPACT), has been shown to increase communication between parents and children and, when paired with a face-to-face intervention, enhance condom skills and lower rates of sex, unprotected sex, cigarette use, and alcohol use. This study will examine whether pairing the FOYC and CImPACT interventions will reduce prevalence of behaviors that present high risk of HIV infection in youth in the Bahamas.

Parents will be randomly assigned to receive either the CImPACT program or a control program called Goal for It (GFI), both of which will be implemented in a 1.5-hour training session. Schools will be randomly assigned to receive either the FOYC program or a control program entitled Wonderous Wetlands. Both programs will be implemented as part of the curriculum in 15 Bahamian elementary schools. Children, therefore, will be part of 1 of 3 groups:

  1. Parent receiving the CImPACT program; school receiving the FOYC program
  2. Parent receiving the GFI program; school receiving the FOYC program
  3. Parent receiving the GFI program; school receiving the Wonderous Wetlands program

Parents and children will be assessed at the beginning of the study and after 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months. These assessments will include questionnaires measuring high-risk behaviors, conceptions of risks and rewards involved in high-risk behaviors, and parent and adolescent communication and monitoring.

In the continuation of this study we will:

  1. Recruit 2600 youth (and their parents) from 172 Grade 10 FHLE classrooms over two years in all seven government high schools in New Providence, The Bahamas
  2. Randomly assign at the level of the classroom 2400 youth (and their parents) from 160 classes to one of four intervention conditions: 1) HFLE only (no parent intervention); 2) BFOOY only (no parent intervention); 3) BFOOY plus ImPACT (delivered to parent-youth dyads); or 4) BFOOY plus GFI (delivered to parent-youth dyads);
  3. Randomly assign one of the seven high schools (with ~12 HFLE classes and ~200 students) to a "control school" condition to permit exploration of possible class-to-class contamination within schools
  4. Assess intervention effects on the entire youth sample at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post-intervention and among parents at 6 and 12 months
  5. Conduct sub-group analyses to explore: i) the impact of related and intensive interventions received at two critical junctures during adolescence; ii) the effect of being part of a longitudinal trial on risk/protective behaviors; and iii) the extent of intervention contamination when randomization is conducted at the level of the class rather than the school. Subgroups will include: Exposed youth (youth who received FOYC in Grade 6) and Naïve youth (youth who did not receive FOYC in Grade 6); Enrolled youth (youth who were enrolled in the ongoing evaluation of FOYC whether as controls or intervention (FOYC) youth) and Not-enrolled youth (youth who were never part of the ongoing study); and Control School youth (those randomly assigned to the control condition at the level of the school in Year 2) and Control Class youth (those assigned to the control condition at the level of the class)

Intervention effect (primary hypotheses):

  1. Youth randomized to HFLE only will exhibit significantly higher rates of HIV risk behavior, intentions and perceptions and lower knowledge and condom skills through 24 months post-intervention than each of the other three groups;
  2. Youth randomized to BFOOY plus GFI will exhibit higher rates of abstinence behavior, intentions and perceptions than youth randomized to BFOOY alone through 24 months follow-up
  3. Youth randomized to BFOOY plus ImPACT will exhibit lower rates of HIV risk behavior, intentions and perceptions and higher rates of knowledge, condom skills, and STD testing than each of the other three groups through 24 months follow-up; Parents receiving ImPACT will exhibit higher knowledge and condom use skills than GFI or control parents; ImPACT parents and youth will report higher rates of discussion about HIV prevention and safe sex than parents and youth in the other three intervention groups
  4. Intervention behavioral effects will be consistent with changes in perceptions and intentions as posited by the PMT, the theoretic model of behavioral change on which BFOOY is based

Secondary/exploratory hypotheses will include:

  1. At baseline, Exposed Youth will demonstrate higher rates of condom-use and condom-use intentions and perceptions than Naive youth
  2. Exposed youth will demonstrate higher protective behaviors, intentions and perceptions compared to Naive Youth within an intervention category (BFOOY or HFLE) throughout the follow-up period
  3. Enrolled youth who received FOYC in Grade 6 will not differ from Not-enrolled youth who received FOYC in Grade 6 with respect to intentions, perceptions and knowledge
  4. Youth in the Control Classes will not differ from youth in the Control school with respect to HIV knowledge, perceptions and intentions As a result of this study we shall be able to identify of one or more interventions or intervention combinations targeting mid-adolescents to reduce HIV risk behavior and address questions regarding possible interactions between intervention receipt in both the pre-adolescent and mid-adolescent years. With this knowledge, health policy officials globally, including those in The Bahamas, will be able to make evidence-based decisions appropriate to their resources and the epidemiology of the epidemic in their settings.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1360

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48230
        • Wayne State University School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Attends 1 of the 15 participating Bahamian elementary schools
  • Enrolled in grade 6
  • Participation of at least 1 parent

In second study:

  • Attends 1 of 8 participating government highschools
  • Enrolled in grade 10

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1
Focus on Youth in the Caribbean (FOYC) plus Caribbean Informed Parents and Children Together (CImPACT)
FOYC is a face-to-face, eight-session, group behavioral intervention based on protection motivation theory and emphasizing skills and decision-making.
CImPACT is a parent intervention addressing parental monitoring and communication with youth. It consists of a 20-minute video, a condom practice, and role play simulating a parent-child discussion.
Experimental: 2
FOYC plus Goal For It (GFI)
FOYC is a face-to-face, eight-session, group behavioral intervention based on protection motivation theory and emphasizing skills and decision-making.
GFI is a one-session parent intervention consisting of a 20-minute video followed by a discussion regarding the process of setting and reaching goals.
Active Comparator: 3
Wonderous Wetlands plus GFI
Wonderous Wetlands is an eight-session, group intervention for youth. It includes field projects and discussions based on ways to save our environment.
Standard Grade 10 curriculum
Other Names:
  • Standard grade 10 health curriculum
Experimental: Grade 10-BFOOY+CImPACT
Youth receives HIV intervention; parents receive parental monitoring intervention
10 session HIV prevention program
Experimental: Grade 10 BFOOY+GFI
Youth receive HIV prevention intervention and parents receive attention control intervention on career planning
10 session HIV prevention program
Experimental: BFOOYand no parent intervention
Youth receive HIV prevention intervention; parents receive no intervention
10 session HIV prevention program
Placebo Comparator: Health and FAmily life
Youth receive standard of care (current curriculum); parents receive no intervention
Standard Grade 10 curriculum
Other Names:
  • Standard grade 10 health curriculum

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Reduction of high-risk behaviors
Time Frame: Measured at baseline and after 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months
Measured at baseline and after 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Intentions concerning high-risk behaviors
Time Frame: Measured at baseline and after 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months
Measured at baseline and after 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Bonita F. Stanton, MD, Wayne State University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2004

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 16, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 16, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

October 17, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 6, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 1, 2017

Last Verified

November 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV Infections

Clinical Trials on FOYC

Subscribe