- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00792194
Improvement of Aerobic Capacity in Cystic Fibrosis Patients With a One-year Home Training Period
September 29, 2015 updated by: University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
Life expectancy of patients with cystic fibrosis has improved dramatically the last few years.
Respiratory complications remain the main contributory factor to the morbidity and mortality associated with the disease.
Exercise tolerance is reduced as the disease progresses, and peak aerobic capacity seems to be linked with survival.
Regular physical activity has positive benefits, including a better body image, an improvement of pulmonary function, of exercise capacity and a possible improvement of quality of life.But because of the considerable variability of the subjects, exercise programs should be tailored to individual needs, and easy included in their cumbersome treatment routines and professional activities.
In the cystic fibrosis center of Strasbourg we are able to propose to the patients a one-year physical exercise program, partly supervised with coaches, at home.
Electronically braked cycle ergometer and heart rate monitoring system are at patients disposal, for one year, at home.
Thus, patients can choose, during the day, the best moment to work out .Subjects will be randomised in two groups:1.
a control group, where subjects are asked to continue their normal daily activities and physiotherapy regime.2. a training group, where subjects are asked to exercise three times a week.
For the training group, three times a week, patients will train for 30 minutes.
Heart rate will be continuously monitored and send to the medical staff every week-end .
A correction of exercise intensity, if needed, is weekly proposed to maintain a maximal training efficiency, and coaches can help them, if necessary.
For the two groups, quality of life will be measured with a disease-specific questionnaire (CFQ14+) (Henry, 1998, Quittner, 2000), and a generic questionnaire (SF 36) (Gee, 2002) before the program, and after 6 and 12 months.
After a one year training program, and compared to the control group, we should expected an improvement in aerobic capacity and peak oxygen consumption, both associated with improved prognosis in cystic fibrosis.
We also expected to observe an improvement in quality of life measurement, shorter hospital stays and fewer exacerbations.
With this kind of program, we also would like to improve the degree of adherence in daily life exercise.
Study Overview
Detailed Description
We hope that regular contact with the coaches or the medical staff will provide self-confidence.
Thus, patients will probably be more able to choose a physical activity which will be enjoyable, shared with others (family, friends), and give real benefits in term of health status.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
50
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Strasbourg, France
- CHRU, Hôpital Civile, Service de Physiologie et Explorations Fonctionnelles
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
15 years to 65 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Man or woman with cystic fibrosis whose diagnosis was documented on clinical history and a test for detecting genetic or sweat test positive
- Patient who signed the informed consent (or parents for patients minors)
- Elderly aged 15 and over
- Patient affiliated with a social security
- Patient against non-cardiac indication of physical
- Patient in stable condition on a respirator with a higher FEV to 1000 ml
- In the case of insulin-dependent diabetes, it must be balanced
- Patient had been informed of the results of the medical examination
- Women of childbearing age have achieved a pregnancy test on urine negative.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Diabetic patient unbalanced known cardiac pathology
- Patient on transplant list
- Patient major protected
- Patient under guardianship or trusteeship
- Safeguard patient justice
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: training group
supervised training program 3 times a week with coach.
|
Subjects will be randomised in two groups: a control group, where subjects are asked to continue their normal daily activities and physiotherapy regime. a training group, where subjects are asked to exercise three times a week, whenever they want during the day.
Other Names:
|
|
No Intervention: group without training
a control group, where subjects are asked to continue their normal daily activities and physiotherapy regime.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Changing the criteria for assessing aerobic capacity: Variations in VO2 max.
Time Frame: 4 years
|
4 years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Assess the impact of retraining at home Going on the frequency of exacerbations, length of hospital stays, daily energy expenditure. Assess the impact of retraining at home
Time Frame: 4 years
|
4 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: LONSDORFER Evelyne, MD, not affiliated
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
December 1, 2008
Primary Completion (Actual)
December 1, 2013
Study Completion (Actual)
December 1, 2014
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
November 14, 2008
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 14, 2008
First Posted (Estimate)
November 17, 2008
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
September 30, 2015
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 29, 2015
Last Verified
September 1, 2015
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2007-A01452-51
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.