Safety Study of Bone Marrow Transplant Using Mismatched Tissue Followed by Chemotherapy

A Phase II Trial of Myeloablative Conditioning and Transplantation of Partially HLA-mismatched Bone Marrow for Patients With Hematologic Malignancies

The purpose of this study is to see if giving high dose chemotherapy and total body irradiation before and repeating high dose chemotherapy after a bone marrow transplant could reduce the incidence of graft rejection and disease for patients with blood cancers

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation (alloBMT), following either marrow-ablative or nonmyeloablative conditioning, is a potentially curative treatment for a variety of hematologic malignancies and non-malignant hematologic disorders. Of all the potential sources of allografts, transplantation of stem cells from a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling has generally produced the best overall outcomes, i.e. overall and progression-free survival. Unfortunately, only about a third of candidates for alloBMT have HLA-matched siblings.

For patients who lack HLA-matched siblings, there are three alternative sources of stem cells for alloBMT: 1) volunteer unrelated donors; 2) umbilical cord blood; and 3) partially HLA-mismatched, or haploidentical, related donors. Since any patient shares exactly one HLA haplotype with each biological parent or child and half of siblings, an eligible haploidentical donor can be identified rapidly in nearly all cases. However, haploidentical BMT has been associated with significant risks of graft rejection and severe GVHD, which are manifestations of excessive alloreactivity by host and donor T cells, respectively.

The risk of severe GVHD may be reduced in intensively conditioned recipients of grafts that have been rigorously depleted of mature T cells or selectively depleted of alloreactive T cells, but the risks of serious infection and death from prolonged immune compromise in these patients remains high. Cyclophosphamide(Cy) is a highly immunosuppressive antineoplastic agent that has an established role in conditioning for alloBMT.

Typically, the drug is administered prior to transplantation to prevent graft rejection by suppressing the host immune system. However, pre-transplantation conditioning with Cy increases the risk of GVHD following allogeneic T cell infusion in mouse models. In contrast, administration of a properly timed, high dose of Cy after BMT inhibits both graft rejection and GVHD.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

107

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21231
        • The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21231
        • Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 months to 65 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Acute lymphocytic leukemia in high risk CR1
  • Acute myeloid leukemia in CR1
  • Therapy-related AML
  • RAEB with >5% and <20% bone marrow blasts
  • Chronic myelogenous leukemia beyond 1st chronic phase; Patients cannot be in blast crisis
  • CMMoL
  • JMML
  • Chemotherapy-resistant Hodgkins Lymphoma or intermediate or high grade Non-Hodgkins lymphoma (Less than a PR after standard or salvage chemotherapy)
  • Mantle cell lymphoma: chemotherapy refractory (Less than a PR after standard or salvage chemotherapy) or patients beyond CR1 with chemosensitive disease
  • Follicular Lymphoma, Grade 3
  • Transformed indolent lymphomas

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Poor cardiac function: left ventricular ejection fraction <45% as determined by MUGA or ECHO. For pediatric patients LVEF <45% or a shortening fraction below normal limits for age.
  • Poor pulmonary function: FEV1 and FVC <50% predicted for patients who have not received thoracic or mantle irradiation. For patients who have received thoracic or mantle irradiation, FEV1 and FVC <70% predicted or DLCO < 50 of predicted. For children unable to perform PFTs because of developmental stage pulse oximetry < 85% on RA
  • Poor liver function: bilirubin >2 mg/dl (not due to hemolysis, Gilbert's or primary malignancy)
  • Poor renal function: Creatinine >2.0mg/dl or creatinine clearance
  • HIV-positive
  • Positive leukocytotoxic crossmatch
  • Women of childbearing potential who currently are pregnant or who are not practicing adequate contraception
  • Uncontrolled viral, bacterial, or fungal infections Patients with symptoms consistent with RSV, influenza A, B, or parainfluenza at the time of enrollment will be assayed for the above viruses and if positive are not eligible for the trial until they are no longer symptomatic (patients may have continued assay positivity for a period of time post resolution of symptoms secondary to the nature of the assay.
  • Indolent lymphomas (Follicular Grade 1 and 2, marginal zone, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, small lymphocytic lymphoma, MALT)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Myeloablative haploidentical BMT
  • All participants except those with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and lymphoblastic lymphoma: Busulfan will be administered 1 mg/kg oral (or 0.8 mg/kg IV) four times per day for four days, followed by cyclophosphamide 50 mg/kg once per day for two days.
  • Participants with acute lymphocytic leukemia or lymphoblastic lymphoma: Cyclophosphamide will be administered 50 mg/kg once per day for two days, followed by total body irradiation at 300 cGy per day for four days.
Participant will receive Busulfan injections, 4 times a day for 4 days with dilantin prophylaxis (in patients 10 years of age or older). Busulfan levels in the blood will be measured and dose adjusted, if needed.
Patient will receive Cy by IV once a day for 2 days.
Other Names:
  • Cytoxan
  • CTX
  • Cy
Patients will receive TBI once a day for 4 days.
Other Names:
  • TBI

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Engraftment as Measured by Donor Chimerism
Time Frame: Day 60
Percentage of participants who achieved donor chimerism >=95%.
Day 60

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Non-relapse Mortality
Time Frame: Day 100, 1 year
Number of participants deceased for reasons other than disease relapse or progression.
Day 100, 1 year
Acute GVHD
Time Frame: Day 100

Percentage of participants who experience grade II-IV or III-IV acute graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) by Przepiorka criteria. The stages are defined as follows:

  • Stage II: Rash on >50% of skin, bilirubin 2-3 mg/dL, or diarrhea 500-1000 mL/day
  • Stage III: Bilirubin 3-15 mg/dL or diarrhea >1000 mL/day
  • Stage IV: Generalized erythroderma with bullae or bilirubin >15 mg/dL This outcome was estimated using proportional subdistribution hazard regression model for competing risks (Fine and Gray 1999)
Day 100
Chronic GVHD
Time Frame: 6 months, 12 months
Percentage of participants who experience chronic GVHD. Chronic GVHD is graded using NIH consensus criteria and Seattle criteria. This outcome was estimated using proportional subdistribution hazard regression model for competing risks (Fine and Gray 1999)
6 months, 12 months
Survival
Time Frame: 1 year, 2 years, 3 years
Percentage of participants alive (overall survival) and alive without disease relapse, progression, or diagnosis of myeloid malignancy (event-free survival). Estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.
1 year, 2 years, 3 years
Relapse
Time Frame: 1 year, 3 years
Percentage of participants who experienced disease progression or relapse. This outcome was estimated using proportional subdistribution hazard regression model for competing risks (Fine and Gray 1999)
1 year, 3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Heather Symons, M.D., Johns Hopkins University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 20, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 21, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

November 24, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 14, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2019

Last Verified

March 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on MDS

Clinical Trials on Busulfan

3
Subscribe