A Study of Tocilizumab in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Have an Inadequate Response to Current Non-Biologic DMARDs

June 28, 2017 updated by: Hoffmann-La Roche

An Open Label Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effect on Disease Activity of Tocilizumab in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis on Background Non-biologic DMARDs Who Have an Inadequate Response to Current Non-biologic DMARDs.

This single arm study will assess the safety and efficacy of tocilizumab in patients with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis who have an inadequate response to current non-biologic DMARDs. Patients will receive iv infusions of tocilizumab 8mg/kg every 4 weeks for a total of 6 infusions, either as monotherapy or in combination with their current non-biologic DMARDs.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

14

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hyvinkää, Finland, 05800
        • Kiljavan Lääketutkimus Oy
      • Hämeenlinna, Finland, 13530
        • Kanta-Hämeen Keskussairaala ; Reumatologia
      • Riihimäki, Finland, 11101
        • Kanta-Hämeen keskussairaala; Riihimäen aluesairaala Reumapoliklinikka

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adult patients, >=18 years of age;
  • moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis;
  • inadequate response to current non-biologic DMARDs

Exclusion Criteria:

  • rheumatic autoimmune disease or inflammatory joint disease other than rheumatoid arthritis;
  • previous treatment with other biologics.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1
8mg/kg iv every 4 weeks for 24 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 24
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. AEs included both serious as well as non-serious AEs.
Baseline up to Week 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Disease Activity Score (DAS28)
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
DAS28 was calculated from swollen joint count (SJC) and tender joint count (TJC) using 28 joints count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (mm/hour) or C-reactive protein (CRP) (mg/dL), and general health (GH) status (measured on a 0 to 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale [VAS] where 0=no disease activity and 100=worst disease activity). DAS28 was calculated using following formulas: DAS28-ESR = 0.56*square root (sqrt) (TJC28) + 0.28*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.70*natural logarithm (ln) (ESR) + 0.014*GH of disease activity; DAS28-CRP = 0.56*sqrt(TJC28) + 0.28*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.36*ln(10*CRP+1) + 0.014*GH of disease activity. DAS28-ESR was adopted to calculate DAS28 if effective ESR data was available; otherwise DAS28-CRP was adopted to calculate DAS28. Total score range: 0-10, higher score=more disease activity. DAS28 <=3.2 implied low disease activity, DAS >3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate disease activity and DAS >5.1 implied high disease activity, and DAS28 <2.6 = clinical remission.
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission (DAS28 <2.6)
Time Frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
DAS28 was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour) or CRP (mg/dL), and general health (GH) status (measured on a 0 to 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale [VAS] where 0=no disease activity and 100=worst disease activity). DAS28 was calculated using following formulas: DAS28-ESR = 0.56*square root (sqrt) (TJC28) + 0.28*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.70*natural logarithm (ln) (ESR) + 0.014*GH of disease activity; DAS28-CRP = 0.56*sqrt(TJC28) + 0.28*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.36*ln(10*CRP+1) + 0.014*GH of disease activity. DAS28-ESR was adopted to calculate DAS28 if effective ESR data was available; otherwise DAS28-CRP was adopted to calculate DAS28. Total score range: 0-10, higher score=more disease activity. DAS28 <=3.2 implied low disease activity, DAS >3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate disease activity and DAS >5.1 implied high disease activity, and DAS28 <2.6 = clinical remission.
Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% (ACR20), ACR50 and ACR70 Response
Time Frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 response: greater than or equal to (>=) 20 percent (%), 50%, and 70% improvement respectively, in tender or swollen joint counts and in 3 of the following criteria: (1) Participant's assessment of pain (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0=no pain and 100=unbearable pain); (2) Participant's assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0=no disease activity and 100=worst disease activity); (3) Investigator's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0=no disease activity and 100=worst disease activity); (4) Participant's assessment of functional disability via health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) (measured using 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do).
Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Level
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
The erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) is the rate at which red blood cells sediment in a period of one hour.
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued the Study
Time Frame: Up to Week 24
Up to Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) or Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Level Elevation More Than 1.5 Times Upper Limit of Normal
Time Frame: Up to Week 24
Normal range of ALT is 7 to 56 units per liter (U/L) of serum. Normal range of AST is 5 to 40 units per liter (U/L) of serum.
Up to Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Lipid Level Elevations
Time Frame: Week 24
Low density lipoprotein (LDL) level was categorized as 'Optimal (less than [<] 100 milligram per deciliter [mg/dL])', 'Near Optimal/Above Optimal (100-129 mg/dL)', 'Borderline High (130-159 mg/dL)', 'High (160-189 mg/dL)', and 'Very high (190 mg/dL)'. High density lipoprotein (HDL) level was categorized as 'Acceptable (40-59 mg/dL)', 'High (>=60 mg/dL)'. Total cholesterol (TC) level was categorized as 'Desirable (<200 mg/dL)', 'Borderline High (200-239 mg/dL)', 'High (>=240 mg/dL)'.
Week 24
Neutrophil Count
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, and 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 30, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 26, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

May 26, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 16, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 17, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

December 18, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 3, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 28, 2017

Last Verified

June 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rheumatoid Arthritis

Clinical Trials on tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra]

Subscribe