A Study for the Evaluation of the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of ARX-F02 (Sufentanil NanoTab) Compared to Placebo in the Treatment of Cancer Breakthrough Pain

December 18, 2014 updated by: AcelRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

A Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Study for the Evaluation of the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of ARX-F02 Compared to Placebo in the Treatment of Cancer Breakthrough Pain

The purpose of this research study was to evaluate ARX-F02 (Sufentanil NanoTab) versus placebo ("sugar" pill or inactive substance) in the management of breakthrough pain in cancer patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

34

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Montebello, California, United States, 90640
        • Clinical Trials and Research Associates
    • Florida
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32257
        • Florida Institute of Medical Research
      • Lakeland, Florida, United States, 33805
        • Lakeland Regional Cancer Center
      • Sarasota, Florida, United States, 34238
        • Sarasota Pain Medicine Research
      • Venice, Florida, United States, 34292
        • Lovelace Scientific Resources
    • Georgia
      • Marietta, Georgia, United States, 30060
        • Drug Studies America, Inc.
      • Newnan, Georgia, United States, 30265
        • Better Health Clinical Research, Inc.
    • Kansas
      • Overland Park, Kansas, United States, 66211
        • International Clinical Research Institute
    • Louisiana
      • Shreveport, Louisiana, United States, 71103
        • Willis-Knighton Pain Management Center
    • North Carolina
      • Flat Rock, North Carolina, United States, 28731
        • Four Seasons Hospice & Palliative Care
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27103
        • Center for Clinical Research
    • Ohio
      • Canton, Ohio, United States, 44718
        • Gabrail Cancer Center
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77024
        • Research Concepts Ltd

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients 18 years of age or older with documented clinical history or evidence of a malignancy.
  2. Patients must have sufficient pain to require at least the equivalent of 60 mg/day oral morphine, at least 25 mcg/hr transdermal fentanyl, at least 30 mg/day oxycodone, at least 8 mg/day oral hydromorphone for a week or longer.
  3. Patient is experiencing 1 - 4 episodes of cancer breakthrough pain per day, on average but not necessarily every day, requiring use of an additional opioid analgesic.
  4. Patient has a life expectancy of at least 3 months.
  5. Patient must have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status rating < 2.
  6. Patient must be able to provide reliable documentation of pain intensity, pain relief, use of rescue medication, and global evaluation of treatment personally or with the help of a caregiver.
  7. Patient must be able to enter simple commands on a Palm Pilot device, personally or with the help of a caregiver.
  8. If patient is female and of childbearing potential she must have a negative urine pregnancy test at screening, and must use medically acceptable methods of birth control. Acceptable methods of birth control include oral or transdermal contraceptives, condom, spermicidal foam, IUD, progestin implant or injection, abstinence, vaginal ring, or sterilization of partner. The reason for non-childbearing potential, such as bilateral tubal ligation, bilateral oophorectomy, hysterectomy, or 1 year or more postmenopausal must be specified in the patient's CRF.
  9. Patient must demonstrate the dexterity to handle the single-dose applicator that will be used for placing the NanoTab™ under the tongue.
  10. Patient and/or caregiver must demonstrate ability to use the NanoTab™ retrieval tool.
  11. There must be a caregiver in the home (or hospice) who will be present for at least 1 hour following each dose during titration.
  12. Patient must provide written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with uncontrollable or rapidly escalating pain.
  2. Patients with a history of psychiatric disease or loss of cognitive function that would prevent patient from providing reliable study documentation.
  3. Patients with oral mucositis or stomatitis.
  4. Patients with a history of substance abuse within the past year.
  5. Patients who are using intrathecal opioids.
  6. Patients with underlying pulmonary disease such as sleep apnea or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease characterized by CO2 retention that is deemed clinically significant by the investigator.
  7. Patients at risk of significant bradyarrhythmia, in the opinion of the Investigator, due to underlying heart disease.
  8. Patients with abnormal chemistry or hematology that are deemed by the investigator to be clinically significant. Abnormalities that are cancer related should be documented.
  9. Patients with clinically significant abnormality on the Screening ECG who, in the Investigator's opinion, should not participate in the study.
  10. Patients who will be receiving chemotherapy or radiation treatment during the 3-week titration phase or 3-week double-blind phase that, in the Investigator's opinion, may dramatically alter the patient's pain level or response to pain medications.
  11. Patients who are taking monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs), or have taken MAOIs within 14 days prior to enrolling in the study.
  12. Patients who have participated in a clinical trial of an investigational drug or device within 30 days of screening visit.
  13. Patients who, in the Investigator's opinion, should not participate in the study or may not be capable of following the study schedule or procedures for any reason.
  14. Patients who are employees or family members of the Investigator, study center or AcelRx.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Titration of sufentanil, the DBL sufentanil & PBO

During the Titration Phase, patients titrated to the effective dosage of sublingual sufentanil NanoTab™(20, 30, 40, 60 or 80 mcg). One sublingual sufentanil NanoTab™ was taken as needed for breakthrough pain.

During the Double-Blind Phase, patients were then randomized to one of six treatment sequences, each of which included seven active doses of sublingual sufentanil (dosage determined in Titration Phase) and three placebo doses taken in random order. One NanoTab™ was taken as needed for breakthrough pain.

During the Titration Phase, patients titrated to the dose of sufentanil that provided adequate pain relief without intolerable side effects. Dosages were 20, 30, 40, 60 and 80 mcg. During the Double Blind Phase, patients were randomized to one of six sequences and took 7 doses of sufentanil (dosage determined in the titration phase, and 3 doses of placebo.
Other Names:
  • (ARX-F02)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time-weighted SPID30
Time Frame: 30 minutes after dosing
time-weighted SPID30 is the sum of the pain intensity difference (PID) over the 30 minute time period. A pain intensity score of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worse possible pain) is recorded at pre-dose, 10, 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes post-dose. The pain score at each assessment time through 30 minutes is subtracted from the baseline pain score to provide the total sum score or SPID30. A higher SPID30 is better and indicates a reduction in pain intensity compared to the baseline score.
30 minutes after dosing

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 28, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

January 30, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 1, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 18, 2014

Last Verified

December 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe