Atacicept in Multiple Sclerosis Extension Study, Phase II (ATAMS ext)

An Open-label, Multicenter Phase II Extension of Study 28063 (ATAMS) to Obtain Long-term Follow-up Data in Subjects With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Treated With Atacicept for up to 5 Years (ATAMS-Extension)

This study (28851) is a long-term follow-up study of subjects enrolled in ATAMS study 28063 (NCT00642902). The aim of this study is to monitor the safety and tolerability of atacicept administered for up to 5 years to subjects with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS).

This extension study consists of two parts. Part A will be double blind and Part B will be open label. During Part A, subjects initially randomized to atacicept will continue to receive the atacicept dose to which they have been randomized in study 28063 (ATAMS) once a week subcutaneously (under the skin). Subjects randomized to placebo in ATAMS will receive atacicept at 150 mg once a week subcutaneously during Part A. Once the results of ATAMS are available and the atacicept dose with the best benefit / risk ratio has been identified, all subjects will be switched to this dose and will continue the extension study open-label (Part B). Throughout the study, subjects and investigators will remain blinded with respect to initial and part A treatment allocation/dose.

Study Overview

• Status: Terminated
• Conditions: Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis
• Intervention / Treatment: Drug: Atacicept 25 mg; Drug: Atacicept 75 mg; Drug: Atacicept 150 mg; Drug: Atacicept 150 mg

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 74
• Phase: Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Australia
  • Box Hill VIC, Australia
    • Research Site
  • Fitzroy, Australia
    • Research Site
  • New Lambton, Australia
    • Research Site
  • Woodville, Australia
    • Research Site
• Belgium
  • Diepenbeek, Belgium
    • Research Site
  • Sijsele, Belgium
    • Research Site
• Canada
  • Alberta
    • Calgary, Alberta, Canada
      • Research Site
  • Ontario
    • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
      • Research Site
• Czech Republic
  • Brno, Czech Republic
    • Research Site
  • Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
    • Research Site
• France
  • Caen, France
    • Research Site
  • Saint-Herblain, France
    • Research Site
• Germany
  • Bochum, Germany
    • Research Site
  • Düsseldorf, Germany
    • Research Site
• Lebanon
  • Beyrouth, Lebanon
    • Research Site
• Lithuania
  • Kaunas, Lithuania
    • Research Site
• Netherlands
  • Breda, Netherlands
    • Research Site
  • Nieuwegein, Netherlands
    • Research Site
  • Rotterdam, Netherlands
    • Research Site
• New Caledonia
  • Winston Salem, New Caledonia
    • Research Site
• Russian Federation
  • Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation
    • Research Site
  • Moscow, Russian Federation
    • Research Site
  • Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
    • Research Site
  • Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation
    • Research Site
  • Samara, Russian Federation
    • Research Site
  • Vladimir, Russian Federation
    • Research Site
  • Yaroslavl, Russian Federation
    • Research Site
• Spain
  • Barcelona, Spain
    • Research Site
  • Madrid, Spain
    • Research Site
  • Malaga, Spain
    • Research Site
• Sweden
  • Stockholm, Sweden
    • Research Site
• Switzerland
  • Basel, Switzerland
    • Research Site
  • Innsbruck, Switzerland
    • Research Site
  • Zürich, Switzerland
    • Research Site
• Ukraine
  • Kharkiv, Ukraine
    • Research Site
  • Kyiv, Ukraine
    • Research Site
  • Odessa, Ukraine
    • Research Site
  • Uzhgorod, Ukraine
    • Research Site
• United Kingdom
  • London, United Kingdom
    • Research Site
  • Sheffield, United Kingdom
    • Research Site
  • Stoke on Trent, United Kingdom
    • Research Site
• United States
  • Arizona
    • Phoenix, Arizona, United States
      • Research Site
  • Illinois
    • Northbrook, Illinois, United States
      • Research Site
  • Michigan
    • East Lansing, Michigan, United States
      • Research Site
  • Ohio
    • Cleveland, Ohio, United States
      • Research Site
    • Cleveland,, Ohio, United States
      • Research Site
  • Pennsylvania
    • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
      • Research Site
  • Tennessee
    • Nashville, Tennessee, United States
      • Research Site

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 16 years to 58 years (Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Participation in study 28063.
• Completion of Week 36 visit of the core study 28063.
• Willingness and ability to comply with study procedures for the duration of the study.
• Voluntary provision of written informed consent (including, for the USA, subject authorization under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)), given before any study-related procedure that is not part of normal medical care and with the understanding that the subject may withdraw consent at any time without prejudice to his or her future medical care.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Premature discontinuation of core study 28063.

• Subjects who meet criteria listed below will receive IMP in study 28851:

  • Subjects who are eligible for participation in extension study 28851 but do not meet these criteria will not be treated with IMP but will undergo scheduled visits, irrespective of their treatment.

• All subjects must satisfy the following criteria before Extension Study Day 1 (D1-EXT; defined as the first day of dosing in the extension study) to be eligible for treatment with IMP:

  • Eligibility for participation in extension study 28851.
  • For women of childbearing potential, a negative urine pregnancy test at eligibility assessment.
  • Female subjects of childbearing potential must be willing to avoid pregnancy by using an adequate method of contraception for four (4) weeks before the first dose administered within the extension study, during the study and for twelve (12) weeks after the last dose of trial medication. Adequate contraception is defined as two barrier methods, or one barrier method with spermicide, or an intrauterine device, or use of a combined oral female hormonal contraceptive (or the definitions requested by health authorities and locally amended in the core study 28063). For the purposes of this trial, women of childbearing potential are defined as: "All female subjects after puberty unless they are post-menopausal for at least two years or are surgically sterile" (For Germany Only: Female subjects of childbearing potential must be willing to avoid pregnancy by using highly effective methods of contraception for approximately four (4) weeks prior to D1-EXT, during and for twelve (12) weeks after the last dose of trial medication. This requirement does not apply to surgically sterile subjects or to subjects who are postmenopausal for at least 2 years. Highly effective contraception is defined as any method or combination of methods which result in a low failure rate (i.e. less than (<) 1% per year) when used consistently and correctly, such as implants, injectables, combined oral contraceptives, sexual abstinence, vasectomized partner, 2 barrier methods, or 1 barrier method with spermicide)
• Willingness and ability to comply with study procedures for the duration of the study.
• To be eligible for treatment with investigational medicinal product (IMP) in study 28851, the subjects must not meet any of the following criteria:
• Non-eligibility for participation in extension study 28851 (premature discontinuation of core study 28063).
• Major protocol violation or non-compliance in the core study.
• Use of prohibited immunomodulatory / immunosuppressive therapies
• Serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) level <3 gram per liter (g/L) if the subject received atacicept in the core study, or serum IgG level <6 g/L if the subject received placebo in the core study (to protect the blinding of the core study, the IgG level will be communicated to the treating physician only if it is too low for extension study participation and only after all Week 36 assessments performed within the core study have been completed).
• Any condition, including laboratory findings that, in the opinion of the Investigator, constitutes a risk or a contraindication for participation in the extension study, or that could interfere with the study objectives, conduct or evaluation.
• Known active clinically significant acute or chronic infection, or any major episode of infection requiring hospitalization or treatment with parenteral anti-infectives.
• Investigator judgement that treatment of the subject with atacicept in the extension study is not appropriate.
• Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), or alanine aminotransferase (ALT), or alkaline phosphatase (AP) level greater than (>)2.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN), or total bilirubin >1.5 x ULN at eligibility assessment.
• Clinically significant abnormality in any hematological test (e.g. hemoglobin <100 g/L (6.21 millimoles per liter [mmol/L]), white blood cells <3 x 10^9 per liter (/L), platelets <100 x 10^9/L) at eligibility assessment.
• Clinically significant abnormality on electrocardiogram (ECG) performed at eligibility assessment.
• Presence of uncontrolled or New York Health Association (NYHA) class 3 or 4 congestive heart failure at Week 36 of the core study.
• Moderate to severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance <50 milliliter per minute (mL/min) according to Cockcroft-Gault equation).
• Allergy or hypersensitivity to gadolinium (Gd).
• Allergy or hypersensitivity to atacicept or to any of the components of the formulated atacicept.
• Diagnosis or family history of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD).

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Quadruple

Number of Arms

4

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Atacicept 25 mg (With Loading)	Drug: Atacicept 25 mg; Subjects who received atacicept 25 milligram (mg) subcutaneously (SC) as loading dose twice weekly for first 4 weeks, followed by atacicept 25 mg SC for 32 weeks, in 28063 study will continue with atacicept 25 mg SC once weekly up to 5 years or up to early termination of treatment or early termination of the study.
Experimental: Atacicept 75 mg (With Loading)	Drug: Atacicept 75 mg; Subjects who received atacicept 75 mg SC as loading dose twice weekly for first 4 weeks, followed by atacicept 75 mg SC for 32 weeks, in 28063 study will continued with atacicept 75 mg SC once weekly up to 5 years or up to early termination of treatment or early termination of the study.
Experimental: Atacicept 150 mg (With Loading)	Drug: Atacicept 150 mg; Subjects who received atacicept 150 mg SC as loading dose twice weekly for first 4 weeks, followed by atacicept 150 mg SC for 32 weeks, in 28063 study will continue with atacicept 150 mg SC once weekly up to 5 years or up to early termination of treatment or early termination of the study.; Drug: Atacicept 150 mg; Subjects who received placebo SC twice weekly for first 4 weeks, followed by placebo SC for 32 weeks, in 28063 study will continue with atacicept 150 mg (without loading dose) SC once weekly up to 5 years or up to early termination of treatment or early termination of the study.
Experimental: Atacicept 150 mg (Without Loading)	Drug: Atacicept 150 mg; Subjects who received atacicept 150 mg SC as loading dose twice weekly for first 4 weeks, followed by atacicept 150 mg SC for 32 weeks, in 28063 study will continue with atacicept 150 mg SC once weekly up to 5 years or up to early termination of treatment or early termination of the study.; Drug: Atacicept 150 mg; Subjects who received placebo SC twice weekly for first 4 weeks, followed by placebo SC for 32 weeks, in 28063 study will continue with atacicept 150 mg (without loading dose) SC once weekly up to 5 years or up to early termination of treatment or early termination of the study.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Number of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, Injection Site Reactions, Infections, and Malignancies by Severity	TEAEs were defined as AEs with a start date after or on the date of the first DB treatment injection in ATAMS Extension and that occurred anytime after treatment discontinuation, or up to the day before first Rebif® rescue medication injection in ATAMS Extension. A serious TEAE was an AE that resulted in any of the following: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect. TEAE severity was graded as per Qualitative Toxicity Scale. Local injection site reactions (injection site: pain, redness, itching and swelling) throughout ATAMS Extension, starting after the first trial medication administration. If the subject experienced 1 or more of the above injection site symptoms, these were reported with the AE verbatim term "injection site reaction". For all randomized subjects, there was an option of rescue treatment with Rebif® for 1 year beginning with the first injection of Rebif®).	From the first dose of study drug administration up to Week 24
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)	Blood pressure (systolic and diastolic) was measured after at least 3 minutes resting, with the subject in the seated position.	Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 and 36
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs: Pulse Rate		Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 and 36
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs: Temperature		Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 and 36
Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECGs)		Baseline, Week 12 and 36
Number of Subjects With Worsened Post Baseline Shift in Immunoglobulin A (IgA), IgG and IgM Levels	Number of subjects with shifts from normal Grade (Grade 0) at Baseline to worse value at post-baseline (Grade 1 to Grade 4) according to the following criteria: IgA Grade 0: greater than or equal to (>=) lower limit normal (LLN) 0.7 gram per liter (g/L); Grade 1: less than (<) LLN - 0.5 g/L, Grade 2: <0.5g/L -0.3 g/L, Grade 3: <0.3 g/L -0.1 g/L, Grade 4: < 0.1 g/L; IgG Grade 0: >= LLN (7 g/L), Grade 1: < LLN - 5 g/L, Grade 2: <5g/L -4 g/L, Grade 3: <4 g/L -3 g/L and Grade 4: < 3 g/L; IgM Grade 0: >= LLN (0.4 g/L), Grade 1: < LLN - 0.3 g/L, Grade 2: <0.3 g/L -0.2 g/L, Grade 3: <0.2 g/L -0.1 g/L, and Grade 4: < 0.1 g/L are presented in this outcome measure.	Baseline up to Week 36
Number of Subjects With Positive Neutralizing Antibody (NAb)		Baseline, Week 12 and 36

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Number of Subjects With Clinical Attacks/Relapses	A clinical attack/relapse was defined as the fulfillment of all the following criteria: Neurological abnormality, either newly appearing or re-appearing, with abnormality specified by both i) neurological abnormality separated by at least 30 days from onset of a preceding clinical event, and ii) neurological abnormality lasting for at least 24 hours.; Absence of fever or known infection (fever with temperature (axillary, orally, or intra-auriculary) > 37.5°C/99.5 °Fahrenheit).; Objective neurological impairment, correlating with the subject's reported symptoms, defined as either i) increase in at least 1 of the functional systems of the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), or ii) increase of the total EDSS score. EDSS overall score ranging from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS) was calculated.	Baseline up to Week 24
Change From Baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Scores at Week 12	EDSS is an ordinal scale in half-point increments that qualifies disability in participants with multiple sclerosis (MS). It assesses the 8 functional systems (visual, brainstem, pyramidal, cerebellar, sensory, bowel/bladder, cerebral and other) as well as ambulation. EDSS overall score ranging from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS) was calculated.	Baseline, Week 12
Change in Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) Score at Week 12	The MSFC is a multidimensional clinical outcome measure which consists of three sub-tests; Timed 25-Foot Walk, 9-Hole Peg Test and Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test-3(PASAT-3). The Timed 25-Foot Walk is a quantitative measure of lower extremity function. The 9-Hole Peg Test is a quantitative measure of upper extremity (arm and hand) function. The PASAT is a measure of cognitive function that specifically assesses auditory information processing speed and flexibility, as well as calculation ability. Standardized results (Z-scores) of these sub-tests and the overall MSFC Z-score as an average of these three Z-scores was calculated. Higher Z-scores reflect better neurological function and a positive change from baseline indicates improvement. An increase in score indicates an improvement (range -3 to +3).	Week 12
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Parameters: Number of T1 Gadolinium (Gd)-Enhancing Lesions Per Subject		Baseline, Week 12 and 24
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Parameters: Volume of T2 Lesions (New or Enlarging T2 Lesions) Per Subject		Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24
Concentrations of Free and Total Atacicept		Baseline and Week 12
Free B-Lymphocyte Stimulator (BLyS) and Free A Proliferation-Inducing Ligand (APRIL) Serum Concentrations.	Levels of free APRIL and free BLyS: Free APRIL serum samples were to be analyzed by using a validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with limits of detection of 0.3125 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) for free APRIL and free BlyS serum samples were analysed using a validated ELISA with limits of detection of 1.56 ng/mL.	Baseline, Week 12 and 36
Pharmacogenetics/Pharmacogenomics Analysis	Gene expression profiling and gene polymorphism identification were to be used to identify putative markers for response to treatment.; Genome-wide gene polymorphism characterization by genome-wide scan.; Targeted gene polymorphism identification of B-Lymphocyte Stimulator (BLyS) , APRIL, (receptor for B cell activating factor of the tumor necrosis factor [TNF] family) BAFF-R, (Transmembrane Activator) TACI and (B Cell Maturation Antigen) BCMA and HLA-DRB1 by direct genotyping or sequencing .	Day 1 and Week 36

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: EMD Serono
• Collaborators: Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
• Investigators: Study Director: Daniel Mikol, MD, PhD, EMD Serono

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Kappos L, Hartung HP, Freedman MS, Boyko A, Radu EW, Mikol DD, Lamarine M, Hyvert Y, Freudensprung U, Plitz T, van Beek J; ATAMS Study Group. Atacicept in multiple sclerosis (ATAMS): a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 2 trial. Lancet Neurol. 2014 Apr;13(4):353-63. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70028-6. Epub 2014 Mar 6.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: March 1, 2009
• Primary Completion (Actual): September 1, 2009
• Study Completion (Actual): February 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: February 26, 2009
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: February 27, 2009
• First Posted (Estimate): March 2, 2009

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): March 20, 2017
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: February 12, 2017
• Last Verified: February 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Pathologic Processes; Nervous System Diseases; Immune System Diseases; Demyelinating Autoimmune Diseases, CNS; Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System; Demyelinating Diseases; Autoimmune Diseases; Multiple Sclerosis; Sclerosis
• Other Study ID Numbers: 28851