Efficacy of Botulinum Toxin Injections in the Rectus Femoris to Treat Stiff Knee Gait Following Acquired Brain Injury

May 2, 2013 updated by: Krisanne B. Chapin, PhD, Mary Free Bed Rehabilitation Hospital

Randomized Controlled Trial on the Effects of Botulinum Toxin Injections in the Rectus Femoris on Gait Function in Stiff Knee Gait Following Acquired Brain Injury

Stiff knee gait is a common gait dysfunction following acquired brain injury. This gait deviation is characterized by reduced knee flexion during swing phase of the gait cycle and adversely impacts safe foot clearance. Stiff knee gait is an inefficient gait pattern and slows walking speed, limiting one's ability to adapt walking to community mobility demands. Fall risk is increased with this gait problem due to low or ineffective foot clearance. Common compensatory strategies are employed, such as circumduction, hip hiking or vaulting, during ambulation.

The purpose of this study is to examine both the immediate (one month post-injection) and longer-term (4 months post-injection) effects of botulinum toxin injections to the rectus femoris (RF) on gait function in persons with brain injury. This study is clinically important to help inform rehabilitation professionals regarding treatment decisions for management of inefficient and often unsafe stiff knee gait problems following brain injury.

Research Questions:

  • Is there a statistically significant difference in mean peak knee flexion between the experimental and control group?
  • Is there a statistically significant difference in mean peak knee velocity during the preswing and initial swing phases of gait between the experimental and control group?
  • Is there a statistically significant difference in gait function (based on 6-Minute Walk time and temporal distance measures) between the experimental and control group?

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Detailed Description

Pathophysiologic factors that may contribute to stiff knee gait in persons with brain injury are muscle hypertonicity of the quadriceps muscles, hip flexor weakness, and over activity of the gastrocsoleus muscles in terminal stance(1). Kerrigan et al (2) reported that hyperactivity of the Rectus Femoris (RF) during swing phase was a key contributor to this dynamic swing phase deficit in adults with spastic paresis. Overactivity of the RF muscle during early swing phase has also been identified as a major contributor to stiff knee gait dysfunction in children with cerebral palsy (3). Recognition of the role of RF over-activity in stiff knee gait in the cerebral palsy population has led to surgical and medical interventions aimed to minimize this constraint on swing phase mechanics, such as RF transfers, RF release, and Botulinum toxin injections (BTX-A)(4,5). Research in the cerebral palsy population supports the application of these interventions to improve knee flexion during swing phase and improve overall gait function and efficiency (6).

The applicability of these directed interventions for stiff knee gait, particularly the less invasive BTX-A injections to RF, has not been well examined in adults with spastic paresis. Two research groups (7,8) examined the immediate effects of a motor branch block of RF in persons post-stroke with stiff knee gait and reported improved maximum knee flexion and mean knee flexion velocity during preswing and swing phase following the block. Very few studies9,10 to date examined the short-term effects of BTX-A injection to RF on gait function and energy cost during walking in persons post-stroke who ambulated with stiff knee gait. Stoquart and colleagues9 found that at two months following BTX-A injections, subjects had improved maximum knee flexion during swing phase and improved knee flexion velocity during toe off. Energy cost improved only in that subset of subjects who had greater than 10 degrees of knee flexion during swing phase prior to BTX-A injections. The results of this prospective observational study provided initial support for the efficacy of BTX-A intervention for stiff knee gait in adults post-stroke, however, the authors only examined the short-term effects of this intervention(9). Also, this study had limitations in its methodology, as gait function pre- and post-BOTOX® intervention was assessed using an automated treadmill as opposed to gait analysis during overground walking at self selected gait speed. Further research is needed to determine if there is longer-term benefit of BTX-A injections to RF on gait function in the brain injury population.

Research Design:

  • Double-blind randomized controlled trial
  • Subjects will be randomly assigned to experimental or control group
  • The experimental group will receive BTX-A injection to rectus femoris (RF) followed by usual care
  • The control group will receive saline injection to RF followed by usual care
  • Subjects and researchers will be blinded to group assignment
  • Three-dimensional computerized gait assessments will be conducted pre-treatment (within 2 weeks prior to BOTOX®/placebo injection), 1 month post and 4 months post-injection

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

19

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States, 49503
        • Mary Free Bed Rehabilitation Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Greater than 6 months post-acquired brain injury
  • Male or female subjects, at least 18 years of age
  • Independent ambulation with or without assistive device or orthotic device
  • Cognitive Rancho Level VI or higher, ability to follow directions, and likely to complete all required visits
  • At least 100 degrees of passive knee flexion ROM
  • Gait velocity greater than or equal to 0.4 m/sec
  • Modified Ashworth scale rating of 1+ or higher for RF spasticity
  • Written informed consent and/or assent has been obtained
  • Meet criteria for stiff knee gait based on baseline computerized gait analysis data less than 2 weeks prior to receiving intervention, including:

    • Peak knee flexion less than or equal to 50 degrees (or > 2 standard deviations below normal adult peak knee flexion)
    • Peak knee flexion velocity less than or equal to 256 degrees/% gait cycle (or > 2 standard deviations below normal peak knee flexion velocity)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Change in spasticity medications during course of the study
  • Ankle plantarflexion contracture greater than 0 degrees
  • Females with a positive pregnancy test, or who are breast-feeding, planning a pregnancy during the study, who think that they may be pregnant at the start of the study or females of childbearing potential who are unable or unwilling to use a reliable form of contraception during the study
  • Has had treatment with botulinum toxin of any serotype to RF or gastrocsoleus up to 12 months prior to enrollment in study
  • Evidence of current alcohol or drug abuse or history of neuropsychiatric condition not related to ABI
  • Concurrent participation in another investigational drug or device study up to12 months prior to enrollment in study
  • Infection or skin disorder at an anticipated injection site
  • Uncontrolled clinically significant medical condition other than the condition under evaluation
  • Known allergy or sensitivity to any of the components in the study medication, including human serum albumin and sodium chloride as well as the botulinum toxin protein
  • Any medical condition that may put the subject at increased risk with exposure to BOTOX including, but not limited to, diagnosed myasthenia gravis, Eaton-Lambert syndrome, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, peripheral neuropathy or any other disorder that might interfere with neuromuscular function
  • Any condition or situation that, in the investigator's opinion, may put the subject at significant risk, confound the study results, or interfere significantly with the subject's participation in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Saline injection
A total of 2 cc sterile normal saline: will be injected in 0.5 cc aliquots into 4 different injectate sites within the rectus femoris (with EMG guidance) of the involved limb.
Experimental: Botulinum toxin injection
200 Units BTX-A reconstituted with 2 cc sterile normal saline in 100:1 ratio. Teflon-coated EMG guidance for confirmation of injection into the Rectus femoris muscle in addition to utilizing standardized injection landmarks, the solution will be injected in 0.5 cc aliquots into 4 different injectate sites within the muscle.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Peak Knee Flexion During Swing Phase of Gait
Time Frame: baseline, 1-month and 4-month post-injection
Measured via computerized gait analysis, the average of peak knee flexion during swing phase.
baseline, 1-month and 4-month post-injection

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gait Function (Based on 6-Minute Walk)
Time Frame: baseline, 1-mo and 4-mo post-injection
Average walking speed as calculated during a 6-min walk
baseline, 1-mo and 4-mo post-injection

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Krisanne B Chapin, PhD, Mary Free Bed Rehabilitation Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Cathy Harro, PT, MS, NCS, Grand Valley State University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 12, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 12, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

May 13, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 24, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 2, 2013

Last Verified

May 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Brain Injuries

Clinical Trials on placebo

3
Subscribe