Propofol and Fentanyl Versus Midazolam and Fentanyl for Endoscopy Sedation in Cirrhotic Patients

May 22, 2009 updated by: Federal University of São Paulo

Propofol and Fentanyl Versus Midazolam and Fentanyl for Sedation During Diagnostic or Therapeutic Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Cirrhotic Patients

The purpose of this study is to compare propofol associated with fentanyl versus midazolam plus fentanyl for sedation during diagnosis or therapeutic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) in cirrhotic patients.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

UGE is often performed in cirrhotic patients for the diagnosis and treatment of portal hypertension complications. Current data suggests that propofol sedation may have advantages over benzodiazepines. However, there are few reports comparing propofol versus midazolam in patients with liver cirrhosis. The study's objective is to compare propofol associated with fentanyl versus midazolam plus fentanyl for sedation during diagnosis or therapeutic UGE in cirrhotic patients. A prospective randomized study will include cirrhotic patients (Child A, B or C and ASA 2 or 3), referred for diagnostic or therapeutic UGE, randomized for group I: propofol (0,5 mg/kg up to 400 mg) and fentanyl (0,05 mg); or group II: midazolam (0,1 mg/kg) and fentanyl. Sedation was performed by an exclusively dedicated gastroenterologist. Efficacy (completion of procedures), complications (hypoxemia, hypotension, arrhythmias) and recovery time (elapsed from the end of the procedure and discharge) will be studied.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

210

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Brazil
      • São Paulo, Brazil, 04024-002
        • Federal University of São Paulo

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Liver cirrhosis, any etiology
  • ASA II or III
  • Child A, B or C
  • Age between 18 years and 75 years
  • Patients that agree in participate of study and signed the contentment term

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Schistosomiasis
  • Recuse
  • Hepatocellular carcinoma
  • Contraindications to drugs
  • ASA IV or V
  • Hepatic encephalopathy, neurologic diseases
  • Opioids, narcotics, MAO inhibitors or benzodiazepines use
  • Alcohol abuse

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Propofol
To receive propofol (0.5 mg/kg up to 400 mg) and fentanyl (0.05 mg);
Drug: Propofol
Propofol dose: 0.5 mg/kg up to 400 mg
Drug: Fentanyl
Fentanyl dose: 0.05 mg
Active Comparator: Midazolam
To receive midazolam (0.1 mg/kg) and fentanyl (0.05 mg).
Drug: Fentanyl
Fentanyl dose: 0.05 mg
Drug: Midazolam
Midazolam dose: 0.1 mg/kg

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To compare propofol and fentanyl versus midazolam and fentanyl regarding safety and efficiency
Time Frame: Three months
Three months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Federal University of São Paulo

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2009

Study Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 20, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 20, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

May 21, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 25, 2009

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 22, 2009

Last Verified

May 1, 2009

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • LCorreia

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cirrhosis

Clinical Trials on Propofol

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Moldova

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe