Comparison of on Demand Sedation With Study Method Versus on Demand Sedation With Conventional Method for Performing Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance

Hypothesis

  1. Study method achieves lower requirement for medications
  2. Study method increases overall cecal intubation with comparable assessment of current experience and patient willingness to repeat future colonoscopy compared with conventional colonoscopy
  3. Study method results in reduction in medication-related (cardiorespiratory) complications, faster turn around of patients, compared with conventional colonoscopy
  4. Study method improves bowel preparation and increases polyp pickup rate

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening for the high and the low risk healthy asymptomatic VA patients is being promoted (VHA directive). Compliance with this Directive will result in an increased number of VA patients undergoing colonoscopy. The demand for colonoscopy far exceeds the capacity available to perform the procedure in the VA system. The conventional practice for colonoscopy at VA facilities across the country is to perform colonoscopy under conscious sedation with air insufflation. Efficiency is governed by the fact that sedated patients require time and space for recovery and these are major limiting factors in the current setting for the use of colonoscopy for CRC screening.

Methods that maintain a high success rate and good patient assessment improve overall compliance for surveillance colonoscopy. Our preliminary experience showed that patients are able to complete successful colonoscopy without sedation in 52% of cases when colonoscopy was aided by a water infusion in lieu of air insufflation method. In this group of patients, the shortened recovery time means a quick turn around of patient and a more efficient endoscopy service. Patients are able to communicate better with the staff and physician regarding their problem and discharge instructions, and not subjected to the amnesic effect of sedation. Next day follow-up of patient by telephone contact which requires commitment of staff time can be obviated.

If this randomized study confirms the success of our preliminary findings and this technique is adopted by more endoscopists, a larger number of VA patients may benefit from less sedation complications and at the same time allow for more efficient colonoscopy screening services.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • California
      • Mather, California, United States, 95655
        • Recruiting
        • Sacramento VA Medical Center
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult (> 50 years old), male and female patients
  • Scheduled and consented for screening or surveillance colonoscopy
  • Accept randomization to the study or the conventional method
  • Agree to complete study questionnaires will be considered for enrollment
  • Normal healthy patients or patients with mild systemic disease, ASA 1 or ASA 2

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who decline to participate, are unable to give informed consent or to complete the questionnaires due to language or other difficulties will be excluded. Excluded patients will be managed by usual procedures at the Sacramento VAMC

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Water infusion
Water infusion in lieu of air insufflation during colonoscope insertion
Water infusion in lieu of air insufflation during colonoscope insertion
Active Comparator: Air insufflation
Conventional air insufflation colonoscopy
Conventional air insufflation colonoscopy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Primary outcome - success of cecal intubation without sedation
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Diagnostic yield, patients' current experience, willingness to repeat future colonoscopy, turn around time, and staff rating of satisfaction, and medication-related complications.
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 11, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

June 15, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 15, 2009

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2009

Last Verified

June 1, 2009

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Colorectal Cancer Screening

Clinical Trials on Water infusion

3
Subscribe