- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00920751
Comparison of on Demand Sedation With Study Method Versus on Demand Sedation With Conventional Method for Performing Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance
Hypothesis
- Study method achieves lower requirement for medications
- Study method increases overall cecal intubation with comparable assessment of current experience and patient willingness to repeat future colonoscopy compared with conventional colonoscopy
- Study method results in reduction in medication-related (cardiorespiratory) complications, faster turn around of patients, compared with conventional colonoscopy
- Study method improves bowel preparation and increases polyp pickup rate
Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening for the high and the low risk healthy asymptomatic VA patients is being promoted (VHA directive). Compliance with this Directive will result in an increased number of VA patients undergoing colonoscopy. The demand for colonoscopy far exceeds the capacity available to perform the procedure in the VA system. The conventional practice for colonoscopy at VA facilities across the country is to perform colonoscopy under conscious sedation with air insufflation. Efficiency is governed by the fact that sedated patients require time and space for recovery and these are major limiting factors in the current setting for the use of colonoscopy for CRC screening.
Methods that maintain a high success rate and good patient assessment improve overall compliance for surveillance colonoscopy. Our preliminary experience showed that patients are able to complete successful colonoscopy without sedation in 52% of cases when colonoscopy was aided by a water infusion in lieu of air insufflation method. In this group of patients, the shortened recovery time means a quick turn around of patient and a more efficient endoscopy service. Patients are able to communicate better with the staff and physician regarding their problem and discharge instructions, and not subjected to the amnesic effect of sedation. Next day follow-up of patient by telephone contact which requires commitment of staff time can be obviated.
If this randomized study confirms the success of our preliminary findings and this technique is adopted by more endoscopists, a larger number of VA patients may benefit from less sedation complications and at the same time allow for more efficient colonoscopy screening services.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Joseph W Leung, MD
- Phone Number: 916-366-5339
- Email: Joseph.Leung2@va.gov
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
Mather, California, United States, 95655
- Recruiting
- Sacramento VA Medical Center
-
Contact:
- Joseph W Leung, MD
- Phone Number: 916-366-5339
- Email: Joseph.Leung2@va.gov
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult (> 50 years old), male and female patients
- Scheduled and consented for screening or surveillance colonoscopy
- Accept randomization to the study or the conventional method
- Agree to complete study questionnaires will be considered for enrollment
- Normal healthy patients or patients with mild systemic disease, ASA 1 or ASA 2
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who decline to participate, are unable to give informed consent or to complete the questionnaires due to language or other difficulties will be excluded. Excluded patients will be managed by usual procedures at the Sacramento VAMC
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Screening
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Water infusion
Water infusion in lieu of air insufflation during colonoscope insertion
|
Water infusion in lieu of air insufflation during colonoscope insertion
|
Active Comparator: Air insufflation
Conventional air insufflation colonoscopy
|
Conventional air insufflation colonoscopy
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
---|---|
Primary outcome - success of cecal intubation without sedation
Time Frame: 1 year
|
1 year
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
---|---|
Diagnostic yield, patients' current experience, willingness to repeat future colonoscopy, turn around time, and staff rating of satisfaction, and medication-related complications.
Time Frame: 1 year
|
1 year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- EBIRE-GI-003
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Colorectal Cancer Screening
-
Sunil PatelCompletedColonoscopy | Mass Screening | Colorectal Cancer ScreeningCanada
-
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterRalph Lauren Center for Cancer Care and Prevention; North General Hospital,...Completed
-
Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH)National Cancer Institute (NCI); National Institutes of Health (NIH)CompletedBreast Cancer Screening | Implementation | Colorectal Cancer ScreeningUnited States
-
Motus GI Medical Technologies LtdRecruiting
-
Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen UniversityNot yet recruitingColorectal Cancer | Gastrointestinal Microbiome | Colorectal Polyp | Mass ScreeningChina
-
Massachusetts General HospitalAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)CompletedBreast Cancer Screening | Colon Cancer Screening | Prostate Cancer ScreeningUnited States
-
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNational Cancer Institute (NCI); The Institute for Family HealthEnrolling by invitationColorectal Cancer ScreeningUnited States
-
University Paul Sabatier of ToulouseAssistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille; Institut National de la Santé Et... and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingColorectal Cancer ScreeningFrance
-
Florida A&M UniversityNational Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)Active, not recruiting
-
Massachusetts General HospitalPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; Brigham and Women's Hospital; M... and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingColorectal Cancer ScreeningUnited States
Clinical Trials on Water infusion
-
East Bay Institute for Research and EducationCompleted
-
Memorial University of NewfoundlandEnrolling by invitationWater Assisted ColonoscopyCanada
-
White River Junction Veterans Affairs Medical CenterIndiana UniversityCompletedAdenoma | Colonic NeoplasmsUnited States
-
VA Northern California Health Care SystemCompleted
-
University of PittsburghNational Institutes of Health (NIH); National Institute of General Medical...Completed
-
University of PrimorskaCompletedBlood Pressure | Energy Expenditure | Substrate OxidationSlovenia
-
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and...Completed
-
National University, SingaporeClinical Nutrition Research Centre, SingaporeCompletedCarotenoidsSingapore
-
University of California, DavisCompletedScreening for Colon CancerUnited States
-
East Bay Institute for Research and EducationCompletedColorectal CancerUnited States