- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00991276
Polysomnography Study Of Pregabalin And Pramipexole Versus Placebo In Patients With Restless Legs Syndrome And Associated Sleep Disturbance
January 22, 2021 updated by: Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc.
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 3-Way Crossover, Multicenter Polysomnography Study Of Pregabalin And Pramipexole In Adults With Restless Legs Syndrome
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of pregabalin and pramipexole versus placebo in the treatment of restless legs syndrome and associated sleep disturbance.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
85
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Alabama
-
Jasper, Alabama, United States, 35501
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Arizona
-
Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85037
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85712
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Arkansas
-
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States, 72205
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States, 72211
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
California
-
Burlingame, California, United States, 94010
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Pasadena, California, United States, 91106
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Redlands, California, United States, 92373
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
San Diego, California, United States, 92103
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
San Diego, California, United States, 92121
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Santa Ana, California, United States, 92705
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Santa Monica, California, United States, 90404
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Colorado
-
Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80012
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Florida
-
Hallandale Beach, Florida, United States, 33009
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Miami, Florida, United States, 33143
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States, 33026
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Spring Hill, Florida, United States, 34609
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Georgia
-
Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30342
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Macon, Georgia, United States, 31201
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Kansas
-
Overland Park, Kansas, United States, 66212
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Kentucky
-
Crestview Hills, Kentucky, United States, 41017
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Lexington, Kentucky, United States, 40513
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Louisiana
-
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States, 70809
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Maryland
-
Chevy Chase, Maryland, United States, 20815
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Brighton, Massachusetts, United States, 02135
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Michigan
-
Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States, 49048
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Portage, Michigan, United States, 49024
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10019
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
North Carolina
-
Hickory, North Carolina, United States, 28601
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Raleigh, North Carolina, United States, 27607
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27103
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Ohio
-
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45227
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Dublin, Ohio, United States, 43017
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Middleburg Heights, Ohio, United States, 44130
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Oklahoma
-
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73112
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Clarks Summit, Pennsylvania, United States, 18411
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania, United States, 19444
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
South Carolina
-
Columbia, South Carolina, United States, 29201
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Texas
-
Austin, Texas, United States, 78756
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Austin, Texas, United States, 78731
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Dallas, Texas, United States, 75231
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of restless legs syndrome with a total score of 15 or more points on the International RLS rating scale (IRLS).
- RLS symptoms interfering with sleep on 3 or more nights per week for at least 6 months.
- PSG confirmation of WASO of at least 60 min, PLMI of 10 or more, and total sleep time of at least 3 hrs and less than 6.5 hrs.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Secondary RLS.
- Daytime RLS symptoms requiring treatment.
- Primary sleep disorder.
- Sleep apnea.
- Night or shift work.
- Concurrent medical disorder that could interfere with efficacy assessment or present a safety concern.
- Pregnant or lactating women.
- Women of child-bearing potential not using acceptable method of birth control.
- Use of prohibited medication.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
- Masking: TRIPLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: placebo
|
capsules; 0 mg once-per-day; 4 weeks of treatment
|
EXPERIMENTAL: pregabalin
|
capsules; 300 mg once-per-day; 4 weeks of treatment
Other Names:
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: pramipexole
|
capsules; 0.5 mg once-per-day; 4 weeks of treatment
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Wake After Sleep Onset (WASO)
Time Frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or Early Termination (ET)
|
WASO as determined by Polysomnography (PSG) was time spent awake from sleep onset to final awakening.
WASO= Wake Time During Sleep [WTDS] epochs + Wake Time After Sleep [WTAS] epochs)/2.
WTDS: number of wake epochs (30 seconds of PSG recording) after onset of persistent sleep and prior to final awakening or end of 8-hour recording/2 and WTAS: number of wake epochs after final awakening until end of the 8-hour recording/2.
WASO was measured on 2 consecutive days within a period.
Arithmetic mean of WASO of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model.
|
Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or Early Termination (ET)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Periodic Limb Movement Arousal Index (PLMAI)
Time Frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
|
PLMAI, as determined by PSG was number of periodic limb movements leading to arousal per hour (per hour of Total Sleep Time [TST]).
Arithmetic mean of PLMAI of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model.
|
Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
|
Subjective Total Sleep Time (sTST)
Time Frame: Week 3 and Week 5 of Each Intervention Period or ET
|
sTST as derived from Subjective Sleep Questionnaire (SSQ), a participant reported subjective estimate of the total amount of time the participant was asleep after lights out until final awakening.
Completed by the participant 30 minutes after waking; recall period is the night before.
Arithmetic mean of sTST of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model.
|
Week 3 and Week 5 of Each Intervention Period or ET
|
Minutes of Stage N1, N2, N3 and R Sleep
Time Frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
|
Minutes of Stage 1 Non-Rapid Eye Movement (Non-REM) sleep (Stage N1), Stage 2 Non-REM sleep (Stage N2), Stage 3 Non-REM sleep (Stage N3) or Slow Wave Sleep (SWS) and Stage REM (Stage R) sleep, as determined by PSG were calculated as total number of Stage N1 30-second (30-sec) epochs divided by 2, total number of Stage N2 30-sec epochs divided by 2, total number of Stage N3 30-sec epochs divided by 2 and total number of Stage R 30-sec epochs divided by 2 respectively.
Arithmetic mean of minutes of stage N1, N2, N3 and R sleep of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model.
|
Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
|
Number of Awakenings of at Least 1 Epoch After Sleep Onset (NAASO1)
Time Frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
|
NAASO1, as determined by PSG, was the number of times there was a wake period of at least 1 epoch from the onset of persistent sleep to light on.
Each entry to be counted must be separated by a Stage 2 Non-REM [Stage N2] 30-second (30-sec) epoch, Stage 3 Non-REM [Stage N3] 30-sec epoch, or stage rapid eye movement [stage R] 30-sec epoch.
The sum of 2 consecutive days of recording was divided by 2 at the end of each intervention period.
Arithmetic mean of NAASO1 of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model.
|
Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
|
Restless Legs Syndrome-Next Day Impact (RLS-NDI)
Time Frame: Week 3 and Week 5 of Each Intervention Period or ET
|
RLS-NDI:participant-rated instrument to assess daytime performance and participant's previous night's sleep, consists of 14 items encompassing 5 domains:tiredness;emotional functioning;social functioning;cognitive functioning;activities of daily living and 1 global item for overall well-being.
Each item: 0-10 scale; 0=Not at all; 10=Extremely.
Total score: sum of scores from question 1-14 (question 10, 11: scores reversed).
Total score range: 0-140; higher scores: more severe impact.
Arithmetic mean of RLS-NDI of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model.
|
Week 3 and Week 5 of Each Intervention Period or ET
|
Periodic Limb Movement Index (PLMI)
Time Frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
|
PLMI, as determined by PSG was number of periodic limb movements per hour based on time in bed (TIB).
Arithmetic mean of PLMI of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model.
|
Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
|
Periodic Limb Movement in Sleep Index (PLMSI)
Time Frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
|
PLMSI, as determined by PSG was number of periodic limb movements in sleep per hour based on TST.
Arithmetic mean of PLMSI of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model.
|
Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
|
Number of Awakenings of at Least 2 Epochs After Sleep Onset (NAASO2)
Time Frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
|
NAASO2, as determined by PSG, was the number of times there was a wake period of at least 2 30-sec epochs from the onset of persistent sleep to light on.
Each entry to be counted must be separated by a Stage N2 30-sec epoch, Stage N3 30-sec epoch, or Stage R 30-sec epoch.
The sum of 2 consecutive days of recording was divided by 2 at the end of each intervention period.
Arithmetic mean of NAASO2 of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model.
|
Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
|
Number of Arousals (NASO)
Time Frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
|
NASO, as determined by PSG, was calculated as number of times there is a shift from a stage N2 to N3 or R 30-sec epoch to a stage N1 30-sec epoch from the onset of persistent sleep to light on.
The sum of 2 consecutive days of recording was divided by 2 at the end of each intervention period.
Arithmetic mean of NASO of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model.
|
Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
|
Arousal Index (NASOI)
Time Frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
|
Arousal index, as determined by PSG, was NASO per hours of sleep from the onset of persistent sleep to light on.
Arithmetic mean of NASOI of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model.
|
Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
|
International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group Rating Scale (IRLS)
Time Frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
|
IRLS: psychometrically; clinically valid; clinician-administered instrument assesses severity of RLS.
RLS symptom severity and impact on daily living comprise of 10 items giving 2 subscale scores and 1 global score.
Subscale scores: symptom severity(6 items) and impact on daily living(3 items), item 3 loaded equally on both subscales.
Global score calculated from 10 items.
Score of all items range from 0-4, total score range:0-40.
Lower scores: lower severity and better quality of life.
Arithmetic mean of IRLS of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model.
|
Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
|
Percentage of Participants With Response to Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
|
CGI-I: 7-point clinician rated scale to assess improvement in disease condition as compared to the start of the study medication (baseline), ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse).
Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved).
Higher score = more affected.
|
Baseline, Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
|
Latency to Stage R Sleep (LREM)
Time Frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
|
LREM, as determined by PSG, was number of non-wake epochs from the beginning of the recording to the first occurrence of Stage R sleep divided by 2. Arithmetic mean of LREM of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model.
|
Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
|
Latency to Persistent Sleep (LPS)
Time Frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
|
LPS, as determined by PSG, was number of epochs from the beginning of the recording ("lights-out") to the start of the first 20 consecutive non-wake epochs (10 minutes of persistent sleep) divided by 2. Arithmetic mean of LPS of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model.
|
Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
|
Wake Time During Sleep (WTDS)
Time Frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
|
WTDS, as determined by PSG, was the number of wake (30-sec) epochs after the onset of persistent sleep and prior to the final awakening or at the end of 8-hour recording.
WTDS was the sum of 2 consecutive days of recordings divided by 2 at the end of each intervention period.
Arithmetic mean of WTDS of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model.
|
Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
|
Wake Time After Sleep (WTAS)
Time Frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
|
WTAS, as determined by PSG, was the number of wake (30-sec) epochs after the final awakening until the end of the 8-hour recording.
WTAS was the sum of 2 consecutive days of recordings divided by 2 at the end of each intervention period.
Arithmetic mean of WTAS of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model.
|
Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
|
Total Sleep Time (TST)
Time Frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
|
TST, as determined by PSG, was the number of non-wake (30-sec) epochs from the beginning of recording to the end of the recording.
TST was the sum of 2 consecutive days of recording divided by 2 at the end of each intervention period.
Arithmetic mean of TST of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model.
|
Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
|
Sleep Efficiency (SE)
Time Frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
|
SE, as determined by PSG, was the TST divided by the time in bed (TIB)(both in minutes), multiplied by 100.
Sum of 2 consecutive days of recording divided by 2 at the end of each intervention period.
Arithmetic mean of SE of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model.
|
Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
|
Hourly and Quarterly Assessment of Wake After Sleep Onset (WASO)
Time Frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
|
WASO, as determined by PSG was time spent awake from sleep onset to final awakening.
WASO = (sum of WTDS 30-sec epochs and WTAS 30-sec epochs)/2, measured on 2 consecutive days at end of each intervention period by each individual hour (8 hours total) and each individual quarter of night (eight hours in 2 hour increments).
Arithmetic mean of WASO of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model.
|
Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
|
Hourly and Quarterly Assessment of Number of Awakenings of at Least 1 Epoch After Sleep Onset (NAASO1)
Time Frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
|
NAASO1, as determined by PSG, was the number of times there was a wake period of at least 1 30-sec epoch from the onset of persistent sleep to light on.
Each entry to be counted must be separated by a Stage N2 30-sec epoch, Stage N3 30-sec epoch, or Stage R 30-sec epoch.
The sum of 2 consecutive days of recording was divided by 2 at the end of each intervention period by each individual hour (8 hours total) and each individual quarter of the night (eight hours in 2 hour increments).
Arithmetic mean of NAASO1 of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model.
|
Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
|
Hourly and Quarterly Assessment of Number of Awakenings of at Least 2 Epoch After Sleep Onset (NAASO2)
Time Frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
|
NAASO2, as determined by PSG, was the number of times there was a wake period of at least 2 30-sec epochs from the onset of persistent sleep to light on.
Each entry to be counted must be separated by a Stage N2 30-sec epoch, Stage N3 30-sec epoch, or Stage R 30-sec epoch.
The sum of 2 consecutive days of recording was divided by 2 at the end of each intervention period by each individual hour (8 hours total) and each individual quarter of the night (eight hours in 2 hour increments).
Arithmetic mean of NAASO2 of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model.
|
Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
|
Hourly and Quarterly Assessment of Number of Arousals (NASO)
Time Frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
|
NASO, as determined by PSG was the number of times there is a shift from a stage N2 to N3 or R 30-sec epoch to a stage N1 30-sec epoch from the onset of persistent sleep to light on.
The sum of 2 consecutive days of recording was divided by 2 at the end of each intervention period by each individual hour (8 hours total) and each individual quarter of the night (eight hours in 2 hour increments).
Arithmetic mean of NASO for each participant at each period was taken prior to employing linear mixed model.
|
Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
|
Hourly and Quarterly Assessment of Periodic Limb Movement (PLM)
Time Frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
|
PLM, as determined by PSG was number of periodic limb movements based on time in bed (TIB).
Calculated at each individual hour (8 hours total) and each individual quarter of the night (eight hours in 2 hour increments).
Arithmetic mean of PLM of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model.
|
Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
|
Hourly and Quarterly Assessment of Sleep Efficiency (SE)
Time Frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
|
SE, as determined by PSG, was the TST divided by the time in bed (TIB)(both in minutes), multiplied by 100.
Sum of 2 consecutive days of recording divided by 2 at the end of each intervention period by each individual hour (8 hours total) and each individual quarter of the night (eight hours in 2 hour increments).
Arithmetic mean for SE of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model.
|
Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
|
Subjective Sleep Questionnaire (SSQ): Number of Awakenings Subscale
Time Frame: Week 3 and Week 5 of Each Intervention Period or ET
|
SSQ: participant-rated instrument to assess sleep behavior; measures sleep quantity, quality.
Comprised of 5 items giving 5 subscale scores: latency, hours of sleep, number of awakenings, total wake time after sleep onset, quality of sleep.
This (1 item) subscale: numerical rating completed by participant 30 minutes after waking; recall period: night before.
Range: 0 awakenings to 30 awakenings.
Lower value indicates better quality of sleep.
Arithmetic mean of this subscale score of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model.
Results of hours of sleep subscale reported as sTST.
|
Week 3 and Week 5 of Each Intervention Period or ET
|
Subjective Sleep Questionnaire (SSQ): Total Wake Time After Sleep Onset Subscale
Time Frame: Week 3 and Week 5 of each intervention period or ET
|
SSQ: participant-rated instrument to assess sleep behavior; measures sleep quantity, quality.
Comprised of 5 items yielding 5 subscale scores: latency, hours of sleep, number of awakenings, total wake time after sleep onset, quality of sleep.
This 1 item subscale (in minutes): numerical rating completed by participant 30 minutes after waking; recall period: night before.
Range: 0-1440 minutes.
Lower value: better sleep.
Arithmetic mean of this subscale score of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model.
Results of hours of sleep subscale reported as sTST.
|
Week 3 and Week 5 of each intervention period or ET
|
Subjective Sleep Questionnaire (SSQ): Quality of Sleep Subscale
Time Frame: Week 3 and Week 5 of each intervention period or ET
|
SSQ: participant-rated instrument to assess sleep behavior; measures sleep quantity, quality.
Comprised of 5 items yielding 5 subscale scores: latency, hours of sleep, number of awakenings, total wake time after sleep onset, quality of sleep.
This 1 item subscale: numerical rating completed by participant 30 minutes after waking; recall period: night before, Range: 0 to 100, higher score: better quality of sleep.
Arithmetic mean of this subscale score of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model.
Results of hours of sleep subscale reported as sTST.
|
Week 3 and Week 5 of each intervention period or ET
|
Subjective Sleep Questionnaire (SSQ): Latency Subscale
Time Frame: Week 3 and Week 5 of each intervention period or ET
|
SSQ: participant-rated instrument assesses sleep behavior; measures sleep quantity, quality.
Comprised of 5 items giving 5 subscale scores: latency, hours of sleep, number of awakenings, total wake time after sleep onset, quality of sleep.
Latency (time to fall asleep [in minutes]): numerical rating completed by participant 30 minutes after waking; recall period: night before.
Range: 0 - 840 minutes, lower value: better sleep.
Arithmetic mean of subscale score of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model.
Hours of sleep subscale results reported as sTST.
|
Week 3 and Week 5 of each intervention period or ET
|
Medical Outcomes Study - Sleep Scale (MOS-SS)
Time Frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
|
MOS-SS:Participant rated instrument, assesses sleep quantity, quality;with 12 items(7 subscale scores:sleep disturbance, snoring, awakening short of breath/with headache, sleep adequacy, somnolence, sleep quantity, optimal sleep;2 composite index scores:sleep problems Index I, II).
Subscale scores total range:0-100(except sleep quantity[range 0-24 hours], optimal sleep[range 0-1: 0= <7 or >8 hours;1=7/8 hours]).
Higher scores=poorer sleep outcomes(except sleep quantity, adequacy).
Arithmetic mean of MOS-SS scores of each participant for all periods was taken before linear mixed model analysis.
|
Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
|
Restless Leg Syndrome - Quality of Life Scale (RLS-QoL)
Time Frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
|
RLS-QoL: psychometrically and clinically valid and reliable participant-rated instrument, assesses impact of RLS on participant quality of life.
Specifically, it assessed effects of RLS on health status function (symptom severity, daily activity, social functioning, sleep, concentrating and decision making, travelling, sexual activity, and work) giving a summary score ranging from 0-100.
Higher scores reflect better quality of life.
Recall period: 1 week prior to assessment.
Arithmetic mean of RLS-QoL score of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model.
|
Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
December 1, 2009
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
June 1, 2011
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
June 1, 2011
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
October 6, 2009
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 6, 2009
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
October 7, 2009
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
February 15, 2021
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 22, 2021
Last Verified
September 1, 2012
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Mental Disorders
- Pathologic Processes
- Nervous System Diseases
- Sleep Disorders, Intrinsic
- Dyssomnias
- Sleep Wake Disorders
- Neurologic Manifestations
- Neurobehavioral Manifestations
- Disease
- Dyskinesias
- Psychomotor Disorders
- Parasomnias
- Syndrome
- Psychomotor Agitation
- Restless Legs Syndrome
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Neurotransmitter Agents
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Central Nervous System Depressants
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Analgesics
- Sensory System Agents
- Protective Agents
- Tranquilizing Agents
- Psychotropic Drugs
- Membrane Transport Modulators
- Dopamine Agonists
- Dopamine Agents
- Anti-Anxiety Agents
- Anticonvulsants
- Calcium-Regulating Hormones and Agents
- Calcium Channel Blockers
- Antioxidants
- Antiparkinson Agents
- Anti-Dyskinesia Agents
- Pregabalin
- Pramipexole
Other Study ID Numbers
- A0081185
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Restless Legs Syndrome
-
Walter Reed National Military Medical CenterWithdrawnEkbom Syndrome | Restless Legs Syndrome, | Restless Legs,United States
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedRestless Legs Syndrome | Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS)United States
-
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.CompletedIdiopathic Restless Legs Syndrome
-
XenoPort, Inc.CompletedRestless Legs Syndrome (RLS)United States
-
American Regent, Inc.CompletedRestless Legs Syndrome (RLS)United States
-
Astellas Pharma IncCompletedRestless Legs Syndrome (RLS)Japan
-
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.CompletedIdiopathic Restless Legs SyndromeJapan
-
UCB PharmaCompletedIdiopathic Restless Legs SyndromeGermany
-
Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris...CompletedIdiopathic Restless Legs SyndromeUnited States, Spain, Finland, Italy, Germany, Sweden, Austria, Netherlands, United Kingdom
-
American Regent, Inc.CompletedRestless Legs Syndrome (RLS)
Clinical Trials on pregabalin
-
Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris...Completed
-
AstraZenecaCompletedDiabetic Neuropathy, Painful; Diabetic NeuropathiesUnited States
-
Jiangsu HengRui Medicine Co., Ltd.UnknownPostherpetic NeuralgiaChina
-
Hamilton Health Sciences CorporationMcMaster UniversityTerminated
-
EMSRecruitingNeuropathic PainBrazil
-
Janssen-Cilag Ltd.Completed
-
The First Hospital of Jilin UniversityCompletedPain, Postoperative | Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee | Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipChina
-
Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris...Completed
-
Ziauddin UniversityCompletedPain, Nerve | Prolapsed Intervertebral DiscPakistan
-
University of British ColumbiaJuvenile Diabetes Research FoundationUnknown