A Study of CDP870 as Add-on Meditation to Methotrexate (MTX) in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

September 25, 2012 updated by: Korea Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

A Phase III Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group, 24-week Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Certolizumab Pegol as Additional Medication to MTX in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Have an Incomplete Response to Methotrexate

The objective of this trial is to compare the efficacy of Certolizumab (CZP) (CDP870) in combination with Methotrexate (MTX) to MTX alone in the treatment of signs and symptoms in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who are incomplete responders to MTX.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

127

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Daegu, Korea, Republic of, 700-721
        • Kyungpook National University Hospital
      • Daegu, Korea, Republic of
        • Catholic University Hospital of Daegu
      • Daejeon, Korea, Republic of, 302-799
        • Eulji University Hospital
      • Inchon, Korea, Republic of
        • Inha University Hospital
      • Kwangju, Korea, Republic of
        • Chonnam National University Hospital
      • Pusan, Korea, Republic of
        • Pusan National University Hospital
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 135-710
        • Samsung Medical Center
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 138-736
        • Asan Medical Center
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Konkuk University Medical Center
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Gangnam Severance Hospital
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 120-752
        • Yonsei University Severance Hospital
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 150-713
        • Catholic University of Korea ST.Mary's Hospital
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Hanyang Universoty Hospital
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Seoul national univeristy
      • Suwon, Korea, Republic of
        • Ajou University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult-onset RA of at least 6 months but not longer than 15 years in duration as defined by the 1987 American College of Rheumatology classification criteria
  • Active RA disease as defined by at least 9 tender joints and 9 swollen joints, ESR of 30 mm/hour or CRP of 1.5 mg/dL
  • MTX (with or without folic acid) for at least 24 weeks prior to the Baseline visit, The dose of MTX and route of administration must have been stable for at least 8 weeks prior to the baseline visit. The minimum stable dose of MTX allowed is 10 mg weekly.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any other inflammatory arthritis (e.g., psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis or reactive arthritis)
  • Secondary, non-inflammatory type of arthritis (eg, osteoarthritis, fibromyalgia)
  • NYHA (New York Heart Association) Class III or IV congestive heart failure
  • current or history of, tuberculosis
  • history of chronic infection, recent serious or life-threatening infection (within 24 weeks , including herpes zoster), or any current sign or symptom that may indicate an infection (e.g., fever, cough)
  • High risk of infection
  • Have received any experimental non-biological therapy, within or outside a clinical trial in the 12 weeks prior to Baseline
  • Have received previous B-cell therapy (eg. Rituximab)
  • Have received any other biological therapy for RA within 24 weeks prior to Baseline visit, except for etanercept where a three month washout prior to baseline visit is acceptable
  • Have received previous treatment with a biological therapy for RA that resulted in a severe hypersensitivity reaction or an anaphylactic reaction
  • Failed to respond to previous treatment with an anti-TNF drug
  • Female breast feeding, pregnant or plan to become pregnant during the trial or for 12 weeks following the last dose of study drug

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo of CDP870+MTX
Given every 2 weeks until Week22 (SC)

Received treatment with Methotrexate(MTX)for at least 24 weeks prior to the Baseline Visit.

The dose and route of administration of MTX had to have been stable for at least 8 weeks prior to the Baseline Visit. The minimum stable dose of MTX allowed is 10mg weekly.

Experimental: CDP870 200mg+MTX

Received treatment with Methotrexate(MTX)for at least 24 weeks prior to the Baseline Visit.

The dose and route of administration of MTX had to have been stable for at least 8 weeks prior to the Baseline Visit. The minimum stable dose of MTX allowed is 10mg weekly.

400mg CDP870 given at Week0, 2, 4 and thereafter 200mg CDP870 given every 2 weeks until Week 22(SC)
Other Names:
  • CIMZIA

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ACR20 Responses at Week 24
Time Frame: Week 24
Achieving ACR20 means 20% or greater improvement in the number of tender joints, a 20% or more improvement in the number of swollen joints and a 20% or greater improvement in at least three of the five remaining core set measures: Patient's and physician's global assessments, Patient's assessment of pain, disability index based on the Health Assessment Questionnaire and C-reactive Protein.
Week 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ACR 20 Responses at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12
Achieving ACR20 means 20% or greater improvement in the number of tender joints, a 20% or more improvement in the number of swollen joints and a 20% or greater improvement in at least three of the five remaining core set measures: Patient's and physician's global assessments, Patient's assessment of pain, disability index based on the Health Assessment Questionnaire and C-reactive Protein.
Week 12
ACR50 Responses at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12
Achieving ACR50 means 50% or greater improvement in the number of tender joints, a 50% or more improvement in the number of swollen joints and a 50% or greater improvement in at least three of the five remaining core set measures: Patient's and physician's global assessments, Patient's assessment of pain, disability index based on the Health Assessment Questionnaire and C-reactive Protein.
Week 12
ACR70 Responses at Week 12
Time Frame: Week12
Achieving ACR70 means 70% or greater improvement in the number of tender joints, a 70% or more improvement in the number of swollen joints and a 70% or greater improvement in at least three of the five remaining core set measures: Patient's and physician's global assessments, Patient's assessment of pain, disability index based on the Health Assessment Questionnaire and C-reactive Protein.
Week12
ACR50 Responses at Week 24
Time Frame: Week 24
Week 24
ACR70 Responses at Week24
Time Frame: Week 24
Week 24
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24
Range of HAQ-DI score: 0-3 This outcome measures changes of HAQ-DI score at Week 24 from Baseline. Lower score of HAQ-DI represents a better outcome.
Baseline and Week 24

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Soo-kon Lee, MD. PhD, Severance Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 9, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 9, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

October 12, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 27, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 25, 2012

Last Verified

September 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe