Unilateral Versus Bilateral Endoscopic Lung Volume Reduction A Comparative Case Study

April 26, 2011 updated by: Heidelberg University

Unilateral vs. Bilateral IBV Placement

Patients with bilateral heterogeneous pulmonary emphysema benefit to differing degrees from unilateral ELVR with complete lobe closure in comparison with incomplete bilateral treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Patient enrolment and data acquisition is to be carried out on a prospective basis. It is planned to enrol a total of 20 patients with bilateral heterogeneous pulmonary emphysema. All patients will undergo treatment at one study centre in Heidelberg. Patients will be considered for both unilateral and bilateral treatment with intrabronchial valves (IBV) on the basis of their emphysema distribution. Patients will be randomised to two treatment arms. 10 patients receive unilateral or bilateral treatment in each case.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

20

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age > 40 inhomogeneous emphysema FEV1 between 20-40% DLCO between 20-40% 6MWT > 150 m

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnant homogeneous disease FEV1 < 20%

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: bilateral

Treatment arm B - incomplete bilateral treatment of in total two lobes (contralateral).

The study will only use Intrabronchial Valves™

In severe cases of COPD even optimum treatment involving bronchodilatation with drugs, physical training and possibly oxygen therapy is unable to influence exercise capacity and the perception of dyspnoea to a sufficient extent. Given the assumption that the elastic recoil of the small airways can be improved by a reduction in lung volume and pulmonary function overall by more ergonomic breathing mechanics and diaphragm function, various endoscopic procedures for lung volume reduction are available. Here one of the most advanced techniques is the implantation of intrabronchial valves. The one-way mechanism of this valve allows air to escape from the downstream lung segment without any influx of "new" air during inspiration
Other Names:
  • Spiration IBV
Active Comparator: unilateral
Treatment arm A - unilateral treatment with complete closure of the worst lobe of the lungs
In severe cases of COPD even optimum treatment involving bronchodilatation with drugs, physical training and possibly oxygen therapy is unable to influence exercise capacity and the perception of dyspnoea to a sufficient extent. Given the assumption that the elastic recoil of the small airways can be improved by a reduction in lung volume and pulmonary function overall by more ergonomic breathing mechanics and diaphragm function, various endoscopic procedures for lung volume reduction are available. Here one of the most advanced techniques is the implantation of intrabronchial valves. The one-way mechanism of this valve allows air to escape from the downstream lung segment without any influx of "new" air during inspiration
Other Names:
  • Spiration IBV

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Improvement in pulmonary function (FEV1) 6-minute walking test
Time Frame: 3 months
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number of major complications(SAE)
Time Frame: 3 months
3 months
Evaluation of the IBV migration rate
Time Frame: 3 months
3 months
Average changes in quality of life (SGRQ)
Time Frame: 3 months
3 months
Average changes in pulmonary function (FEV1, IVC, RV, TLC, RV/TLC)
Time Frame: 3 months
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Felix JF Herth, MD, Heidelberg University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2011

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 14, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 14, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

October 15, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 27, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2011

Last Verified

October 1, 2009

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pulmonary Emphysema

Clinical Trials on IBV Implantation

3
Subscribe