Safety and Efficacy of Reduced Versus Standard Dose Efavirenz (EFV) Plus Two Nucleotides in Antiretroviral-naïve Adults. (ENCORE1)

February 18, 2020 updated by: Kirby Institute

A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Trial to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Reduced Dose Versus Standard Dose EFV Plus Two Nucleotides (N(t)RTI) in Antiretroviral-naïve HIV-infected Adults Over 96 Weeks

Clinical data suggests that the standard dose of the anti-HIV medication, efavirenz (EFV), could be reduced without compromising its effectiveness. Lower drug doses could have fewer side effects and would make EFV more affordable. The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness, over 96 weeks, of standard (600mg) versus reduced dose (400mg) EFV in controlling HIV as part of initial combination antiretroviral therapy.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

In this international, multicenter trial, 630 HIV infected patients who have not received any previous treatment for their HIV-infection will be enrolled. Participants will be randomized equally (1:1) to receive Truvada (tenofovir and emtricitabine) with either the standard or reduced dose of EFV. Neither the study doctor nor the participant will know which treatment the participant is receiving. Physical examinations, laboratory analyses and questionnaires will be performed at the 11 study visits at screening, baseline (Week 0), Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and 96. The primary aim of this study is to compare between treatment groups the proportion of patients with undetectable HIV viral load (HIV RNA < 200 copies/mL) after 48 weeks. Information on immune function, drug adherence, resistance to antiretrovirals, quality of life, mental state and HIV-related conditions will also be collected. Blood samples will be collected for future testing. Interim analyses will be performed when the first 125 participants in each treatment group reach week 24 and when all participants reach week 24. These interim analyses will provide an early check that the reduced dose of EFV suppresses HIV infection as effectively as the standard dose of EFV. A follow-up analysis will be performed when all participants reach week 96.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

636

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New South Wales
      • Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 2010
        • St Vincent's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • HIV-1 positive by licensed diagnostic test
  • aged >16 years of age (or minimum age as determined by local regulations or as legal requirements dictate)
  • 50 < cluster of differentiation (CD)4 <500 cells/µL
  • No prior AIDS-defining illness, using the Center for Diseases Control 1993 Case Definition (except pulmonary tuberculosis)
  • HIV RNA ≥1000 copies/mL
  • no prior exposure to antiretroviral therapy (ART) (including short course ART for preventing MTCT)
  • calculated creatinine clearance (CLCr) more than or equal to 50 mL/min (Cockcroft-Gault formula)
  • provision of written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • the following laboratory values:

    • absolute neutrophil count (ANC) <500 cells/μL
    • hemoglobin <7.0 g/dL
    • platelet count <50,000 cells/μL
    • alanine aminotransferase and/or aspartate aminotransferase >5 x upper limit of normal
  • pregnant women or nursing mothers
  • active opportunistic or malignant disease not under adequate control
  • use of immunomodulators within 30 days prior to screening
  • use of any prohibited medications
  • current alcohol or illicit substance use that might adversely affect study participation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: 600 milligram (mg) Efavirenz
Eligible patients will be centrally randomised to receive tenofovir (TDF) (300mg qd)/emtricitabine (FTC) (200mg qd) + EFV (600mg qd; 3 x 200mg qd)
3 x EFV 200 milligram (mg) tablets once daily
Other Names:
  • Matrix EFV 200mg tablets
EXPERIMENTAL: 400mg Efavirenz
Eligible patients will be centrally randomised to receive TDF (300mg qd)/FTC (200mg qd) + EFV (400mg qd; 2 x 200mg + 1 x 200mg placebo qd).
2 x EFV 200 milligram (mg) tablets plus 1x matched EFV placebo tablet once daily
Other Names:
  • Matrix EFV 200mg tablets
  • Matrix EFV 200mg matched placebo tablets.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <200 Copies/mL 48 Weeks After Randomisation
Time Frame: 48 weeks
Percentage of participants in each of the treatment arms with centrally quantified plasma HIV-1 RNA viral load <200 copies/mL 48 weeks after randomisation.
48 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <400 Copies/mL and <50 Copies/mL at 48 and 96 Weeks After Randomisation
Time Frame: Baseline and 2 years
Percentage of participants in each of the two treatment arms with plasma HIV-1 RNA <400 copies/mL and <50 copies/mL at 48 and 96 weeks after randomisation
Baseline and 2 years
Mean Change From Baseline in CD4+ T-cell Count
Time Frame: Baseline and 2 years
Mean change from baseline to week 96 in CD4+ T-cell count/mm3 between the two treatment arms
Baseline and 2 years
Clinical Endpoints: Opportunistic Disease or Death, and Serious Non-AIDS-defining Events and Non-AIDS-related Mortality
Time Frame: up to 2 years
Number of participants in each randomised arm diagnosed with a serious non-AIDS defining event, who die from an AIDS-defining event, who die from a non-AIDS-defining event
up to 2 years
Change From Baseline in Metabolic Endpoints
Time Frame: Baseline and 2 years
Change from baseline to week 96 in fasted total cholesterol, high density cholesterol and low density cholesterol, and glucose between randomised treatment arms
Baseline and 2 years
Adherence: Median Scores of Self-reported Adherence to Randomised Study Medications
Time Frame: 2 years
AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) 7-day adherence questionnaire scores. Maximum value is all pills taken every day; minimum value is no pills taken per day. Higher scores indicate a better outcome.
2 years
Change From Baseline in Fasted Insulin Levels
Time Frame: Baseline and 2 years
Change from baseline to week 96 in fasted insulin levels
Baseline and 2 years
Change in Selected Serum Biochemical Parameters
Time Frame: Baseline and 2 years
Change from baseline to week 96 in alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase and alkaline phosphatase levels between randomised treatment arms
Baseline and 2 years
Change From Baseline in Estimate Creatinine Clearance
Time Frame: Baseline and 2 years
Change from baseline to week 96 in estimate creatinine clearance between randomised treatment arms
Baseline and 2 years
Steady-state Efavirenz Concentrations
Time Frame: Week 4
Steady-state efavirenz mid-dosing interval plasma concentrations
Week 4

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David Cooper, Professor, Kirby Institute

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2011

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2013

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 9, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 10, 2009

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

November 11, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 21, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 18, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe