Evaluation of the Single Use Flexible Optical Scope Versus Multiple Use Flexible Optical Scopes for Intubation

August 23, 2011 updated by: Michael Seltz Kristensen, Rigshospitalet, Denmark

Evaluation and Comparison of the New Single Use Ambu aScope With Olympus BF 160 Multiple Use Scope for Securing the Airway of the Anaesthetised/Awake Patients' Normal or Difficult Airway

The study is in two parts

Part one of the study describes the use of the new single-use flexible video-scope for intubation of patients with predicted normal airways.

Part two compares the performance of the single-use flexible video-scope with that of a conventional flexible video-scope for awake intubation of patients with predicted difficult airways.

The hypothesis is that the new single-use flexible video-scope for intubation performs as well as the traditional scope.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Copenhagen, Denmark, 2100
        • Rigshospitalet, section for anaesthesia for ENT and Maxillofacial surgery, section 3071

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Study part 1:

    • Patients scheduled for tracheal intubation and predicted to have a normal airway
    • ASA class I, II or III
    • >18 years
  2. Study part 2:

    • Adult patients scheduled for tracheal intubation and predicted to have a difficult airway
    • ASA class I, II or III
    • >18 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Study part 1:

    • Massive bleeding from the mouth
    • Previously abandoned flexible optical intubation
  2. Study part 2:

    • Massive bleeding from the mouth
    • Previously abandoned flexible optical intubation
    • Patients with audible stridor
    • Patients with dyspnea

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Conventional flexible videoscope for intubation
tracheal intubation with a single use flexible videoscope
EXPERIMENTAL: Single-patient flexible endoscope
Single-patient flexible video-endoscope used for tracheal intubation in this intervention-arm
tracheal intubation with a single use flexible videoscope

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
time for completion of intubation
Time Frame: September 2010
This, the time for intubation, is measured immediately during the intubation, on the day that the specific patient participates in the study
September 2010

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
time for preparing and cleaning the endoscopes
Time Frame: september 2010
this is measured in the hour before and after the intubation
september 2010
number of intubation attempts
Time Frame: september 2010
measured during the intubation
september 2010
success rate of endotracheal intubation
Time Frame: september 2010
measured during the intubation
september 2010
total time for the intubation-procedure inclusive the time for distributing local analgesics
Time Frame: september 2010
measured during the intubation
september 2010
Quality of the image from the videoscope
Time Frame: september 2010
Observed immediately before, and during, the intubation
september 2010
Evaluation of the insertion cord of the flexible scope
Time Frame: september 2010
measured during the intubation
september 2010
Evaluation of the working-/-injection-channel
Time Frame: september 2010
measured during the intubation
september 2010

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael S Kristensen, MD, Rigshospitalet, Denmark

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2009

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2010

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 25, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 7, 2010

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

April 9, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

August 24, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 23, 2011

Last Verified

March 1, 2010

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • aScope-1+2 a
  • H-A-2009-022

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Difficult Airway

Clinical Trials on tracheal intubation with a single use flexible videoscope

Subscribe