CT Analysis of Structural Buttresses in the Traumatised Nose

April 1, 2014 updated by: National University Hospital, Singapore

CT Analysis of Structural Buttresses in the Traumatised Nose - A Basis for Decision Making for Early Open Rhinoplasty and Biomechanical Study of Nasal Structural Support

Hypothesis: There are 5 support buttresses in the complex osteocartilaginous architecture of the nose.

  1. The membranous septum;
  2. The Right nasal bone;
  3. The Left nasal bone;
  4. The perpendicular plate of the ethmoid;
  5. The vomer, vomerine groove and anterior nasal spine.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Aim:

  1. Study the 3-dimensional anatomy of the nasal buttresses.
  2. Diagnose fracture patterns in the nasal buttresses.
  3. Identify the buttress fractures associated with deviation of the external nasal morphology.
  4. Identify the buttress fractures associated with septal deviation.
  5. Assess the airflow patterns and its associated distribution of flow velocity, pressure, and wall shear stress in the nasal cavity for patient specific models with nose fracture.
  6. Assess the stress distribution in the nasal bone structures subject to various scenarios of loading conditions.

Methodology:

67 consecutive patients admitted for facial fractures and who undergo routine CT scans of the face with our protocol of axial and coronal sections taken at 0.6mm and gantry 0 are to be studied. The CT scans are evaluated to assess the position, comminution and displacement of the 5 said buttresses.

The buttresses are graded Grade 1 Simple fracture without displacement Grade 2 Simple fracture with displacement Grade 3 Comminuted fracture without displacement Grade 4 Comminuted fracture with minimal displacement Grade 5 Comminuted fractured with displacement

The septum is graded from Grade 0 Septum is straight Grade 1 Septum is deviated by less than 1 half the distance from the midline to the nasal turbinate Grade 2 Septum is deviated by more than 1 half the distance from the midline to the nasal turbinate Grade 3 Septum is almost touching the nasal turbinate

Variables to be assessed included

  1. Grade of Severity of Nasal and Septal fracture

    1. Which is the weakest buttress that is most commonly broken?
    2. Which is the least often fractured and strongest buttress?
    3. Which buttress or buttresses are involved in a undisplaced septal fracture?
    4. Which buttress or buttresses are involved in a displaced septal fracture?
    5. Which buttresses or buttresses are involved in a undisplaced nasal fracture?
    6. Which buttress or buttresses are involved in a displaced nasal fracture?
    7. For a buttress to be displaced, the number of fractures in a single buttress?
  2. Assessment of biomechanical stability

    1. Assessment of stress distribution in the nasal buttresses for various scenarios of external loadings
    2. Assessment of nasal fracture patterns in different traumatic forces
    3. Assessment of stress wave propagation in the nasal bones during impact.
  3. Assessment of nasal air-flow via the nasal airways

Methods for data management and analysis (incl. Biostatistical check)

  1. Segmentation and Reconstruction of 3D Nasal Model

    Given the CT images of a patient, the nasal bones and surrounding facial bones are segmented and a 3D model of the bones is reconstructed. This can be accomplished using a segmentation and 3D reconstruction software. We have developed a preliminary version of the software for segmenting and reconstructing 3D model of craniofacial bones based on fast marching method. The software can be adapted to focus on reconstructing 3D model of the nasal buttresses.

  2. Nonlinear Registration with Reference Model

    The 3D fractured model is registered with a normal reference model for fracture analysis. A novel nonlinear registration technique is required to decouple normal variations among normal people and variations due to fractures. In this way, the normal reference model can be deformed in a manner consistent with normal variations to register to the fractured model. After registration, the registered reference could serve as a model of the patient prior to the injury. Moreover, differences between the fractured model and the registered reference would indicate variations due to fractures. The extent of the fractures and displacements of bones can also be measured.

    To accomplish the novel nonlinear registration, a generalized form of source separation method is needed. In particular, the idea of discriminates subspace analysis (Zhang and Sim) developed by our colleagues for analyzing variations of facial images for face recognition may be applicable. The method can decouple variations due to different people and variations due to illumination and view point.

    To enhance the accuracy of analysis, multiple normal reference models may be required for the patients in different ethnic groups.

  3. Visualization of 3D Models

    Generic visualization tools do not discriminate between the nasal bones and other craniofacial bones. It is difficult and inconvenient to use them to visualize only the nasal structure. So, a software tool will be developed to visualize the nasal structure of the fractured models. It can also be used to visualize the registration of the fractured models with the normal reference and other fracture analysis results.

  4. Classification of Fracture Patterns

After detecting and measuring the fractured bones, the fractured models can be classified according to their fracture patterns. This can be accomplished manually with the assistance of classification software.

Subsequently,

  1. Refinement of Nonlinear Registration Method

    Refinement of the nonlinear registration method will be performed to improve its accuracy.

  2. Biomechanical studies

Three dimensional finite element models of the nose, in particular the septum will be constructed from the CT scans. Finite element analysis will be carried out to assess the deformation, stress wave propagation and stress distribution in the nasal structures. Flow simulation using computational fluid dynamics will also be carried out to assess the flow pattern in the nasal cavity due to the nasal fracture.

Finally,

1. Biomechanical studies

Three dimensional finite element models of the nose with various proposed techniques for the correction of nasal fracture will be carried out to assess the strength and weakness of the resulting nasal structures due to the corrective surgical procedure. Computation fluid dynamics will also be carried out to assess the flow pattern or nasal patency of the airway after the proposed surgical corrections.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

67

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Singapore, Singapore, 119074
        • National University Hospital, Singapore

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

67 consecutive patients admitted for facial fractures and who undergo routine CT scans of the face with our protocol of axial and coronal sections taken at 0.6mm and gantry 0 are to be studied. The CT scans are evaluated to assess the position, comminution and displacement of the 5 said buttresses.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 21 - 80 years old
  • Both Male, Female
  • All patients with nasal fracture and are able to give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

- Patient refusal

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Nasal Fracture

67 patients admitted for facial fractures and who undergo routine CT scans of the face are to be studied. CT scans are evaluated to assess the position, comminution and displacement of the 5 said buttresses.

The buttresses are graded Grade 1 Simple fracture without displacement Grade 2 Simple fracture with displacement Grade 3 Comminuted fracture without displacement Grade 4 Comminuted fracture with minimal displacement Grade 5 Comminuted fractured with displacement

The septum is graded from Grade 0 Septum is straight Grade 1 Septum is deviated by less than 1 half the distance from the midline to the nasal turbinate Grade 2 Septum is deviated by more than 1 half the distance from the midline to the nasal turbinate Grade 3 Septum is almost touching the nasal turbinate

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Normal architecture of the nasal buttresses
Time Frame: 1 year

To impact current clinical practice and improve the treatment outcomes by utilizing CT scans to analyze

  1. Normal architecture of the nasal buttresses;
  2. Fracture patterns of the buttresses associated with septal deviation and changes to the external nasal morphology;
  3. Weakest buttress as seen by the highest frequency of fracture;
  4. Strongest buttress as seen by the lowest frequent of fracture;
  5. Assessment of nasal patency due to the changes in nasal morphology before and after the surgical correction.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Shu Jin Lee, MD, National University Hospital, Singapore

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 2, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

June 3, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 3, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 1, 2014

Last Verified

April 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • NUHS/SUR-PRAS/2010/3
  • D / 09 / 383 (Registry Identifier: DSRB - D / 09 / 383)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fractures

3
Subscribe