Multilevel Intervention for Physical Activity in Retirement Communities (MIPARC)

August 1, 2017 updated by: Jacqueline Kerr, University of California, San Diego

MIPARC - Multilevel Intervention for Physical Activity in Retirement Communities

The purpose of this study was to assess whether a 6-month multilevel physical activity intervention can significantly increase physical activity levels in sedentary adults, 65 and older, living in Continuing Care Retirement Communities (CCRCs).

Sedentary residents (N=307) in 11 CCRCs received the multilevel MIPARC intervention or a control health education program for 6 months. A group randomized control design was employed with site as the unit of randomization. The intervention was delivered through group sessions, phone calls, printed materials, tailored signage and mapping and targeted peer led advocacy efforts.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Objective monitoring of physical activity suggests that fewer than 3% of adults over age 60 meet current physical activity guidelines. Ecological models posit that behavioral interventions are most effective when they operate on multiple levels. The MIPARC study intervenes on four levels: individual (pedometer-based self monitoring, educational materials and monthly counseling calls), interpersonal (monthly group sessions and peer mentoring), environment (walking signage prompts, tailored walking maps, step counts)and policies (review of on-site activity opportunities and walkability, recommendations for change and peer led advocacy)to increase the activity levels of residents. The study promotes walking as the primary means to increase light to moderate PA, with a secondary focus on strength and flexibility and decreased sedentary behavior.

As most Continuing Care Retirement Communities have management structures that provide the opportunity to improve the social and built environments for physical activity and walking, this study also aims to train participants on how to advocate for improvements in the environment that would improve walkability.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

307

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • La Jolla, California, United States, 92093
        • University of California, San Diego

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Over the age of 65
  • Able to walk 20 meters independently (without human assistance, can use cane/walker)
  • Able to speak and read in English
  • No cognitive, vision or hearing impairments that would prevent provision of informed consent, comprehension of instructions, completion of surveys and participation in phone conversations
  • Able to complete the Timed Up and Go Test to assess falls risk within 30 seconds
  • Live within the selected retirement community (facility-dwelling) Able to hold brief conversation over the telephone.
  • Will be in San Diego for the duration of the study
  • Provision of consent to participate
  • Willing to wear a pedometer, accelerometer and GPS device
  • Willing to complete all surveys and attend weekly meetings
  • No history of falls in previous that resulted in an injury or hospitalization in the past 12 months
  • Physician clearance to participate

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to give informed, voluntary consent
  • Inability to complete assessments
  • Lack of written physician consent to participate in unsupervised light-to-moderate intensity walking
  • Inability to speak and read English

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: MIPARC intervention

Eleven Continuing Care Retirement Communities were randomized to either the MIPARC intervention or an attention-control condition. The intervention focused on increasing light to moderate PA.

The MIPARC study intervenes on four levels: individual (pedometer self monitoring, educational materials and monthly counseling calls, support), interpersonal (monthly group educational sessions and peer mentoring), environment (walking signage prompts, tailored environmental resources, step counts)and policies (review of on-site activity opportunities and walkability, recommendations for policy change and peer led advocacy)to increase the activity levels of residents.

For the first 3 months, intervention participants will engage in either a group educational session, phone counseling call, or a peer led session, on a rotating basis.
Behavioral: Physical Activity

MIPARC will focus on 3 physical activity goals:

  1. increasing walking behavior through gradually increasing step goals
  2. increasing attendance at available on-site and local aerobic, strength and flexibility classes, as well as prompting stair use,
  3. reducing sedentary behavior. Participants will monitor their steps with a pedometer, daily step logs and progress charts. All participants will have a gradually increasing fixed step goal for each week that will result in an total increase of 3000 steps after 3 months, which they will be supported to maintain for an additional 3 months.
Behavioral: Group educational sessions
Every three weeks, participants will be required to attend a group education session, where researchers will teach behavior change strategies and allow participants to share their experiences and offer support to each other. The group sessions will follow a common format including: a group exercise (e.g. quiz), group discussion of use of behavior change strategies (e.g. overcoming barriers), and will end with a behavior change strategy instruction and goal setting component.
Behavioral: Phone counseling call

To support a tailored intervention delivery, participants will receive 4 individual phone calls (in weeks 2, 5, 8, and 11) from a trained health counselor. The phone call will follow the following format:

  1. health check
  2. step goal check
  3. barrier identification
  4. problem solving
  5. specific goals to achieve target step counts. Counselors will prompt participants to report any adverse events, illnesses, medication changes or counter indicative symptoms. The calls will cease during the second 3 months to allow participants to practice self help techniques while still supported by the group sessions and peer mentoring.
Behavioral: Peer Mentoring

Three peer mentors at each CCRC will be trained in intervention content and delivery, measurement support, and advocacy. The peer mentors will lead a group session once every three weeks for the 6 month intervention period and once a month for the following 6 months. The peer mentors will formulate their own ideas for these sessions but we will suggest they include group walks, group activities and trips to active locations, etc.

The peers will help study staff to answer questions from participants and assist with study compliance and retention. They will also receive advocacy training from a non-profit advocacy organization to conduct walk audits of their CCRC and help mobilize participants to make changes to their community that will increase or improve the opportunities for physical activity.

Behavioral: Policy Change
In order to increase the sustainability of the project, MIPARC will focus on addressing on-site policies and neighborhood factors that are barriers to physical activity. Peers and staff will conduct site inspections to identify these barriers (e.g. lack of facilities, limited opening hours, unsafe sidewalks, etc.) which will be prioritized and presented to CCRC management and community officials.
Behavioral: Support
A binder of professionally prepared materials will be provided at the beginning of the intervention and are referred to by researchers in the group sessions and phone counseling calls. The materials provide important information to encourage knowledge, self efficacy and realistic expectations.
Behavioral: Tailored environmental resources
Participants will be provided with a set of printed materials relating to the residential and neighborhood environment of their CCRC. A list of step counts for key indoor routes will be provided as well as safe walking route maps for the site an local neighborhood.
Behavioral: Group educational sessions
Lectures will be delivered every three weeks to match the MIPARC intervention schedule. Sessions will include topics such as medications, foot care and nutrition. Physical activity will not e discussed in these sessions but participants will receive informational pamphlets on the benefits of physical activity.
Active Comparator: Health Education Control
The control group received an active health education intervention. The education curriculum will involve both lectures and mailed materials. The lectures were delivered to match the MIPARC intervention schedule. Sessions included information on general health and healthy aging. Physical activity was not discussed in these sessions but participants received information on the benefits of PA. Control participants also received health check phone calls to match the individual attention paid to participants in the MIPARC intervention sites.
Behavioral: Group educational sessions
Every three weeks, participants will be required to attend a group education session, where researchers will teach behavior change strategies and allow participants to share their experiences and offer support to each other. The group sessions will follow a common format including: a group exercise (e.g. quiz), group discussion of use of behavior change strategies (e.g. overcoming barriers), and will end with a behavior change strategy instruction and goal setting component.
Behavioral: Group educational sessions
Lectures will be delivered every three weeks to match the MIPARC intervention schedule. Sessions will include topics such as medications, foot care and nutrition. Physical activity will not e discussed in these sessions but participants will receive informational pamphlets on the benefits of physical activity.
Behavioral: Health check phone call
For the first 3 months, control participants will also receive a health check phone call to match the individual attention paid to participants in the MIPARC sites.
Behavioral: Pedometer
Participants will also keep the pedometer they wear during the baseline measurement week to satisfy any curiosity about the devices and the step entry criteria. They will be given instructions on its use but will not be taught the benefits of self-monitoring.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Daily Minutes of Physical Activity
Time Frame: Baseline
Measured by 7 day accelerometry with a 760 cpm cutpoint.
Baseline
Daily Minutes of Physical Activity
Time Frame: 6 months
Measured by 7 day accelerometry in adults, ≥65, with a 760 CPM cutpoint.
6 months
Minutes of Light to Moderate Physical Activity
Time Frame: 12 months
Measured by 7 day accelerometry in adults, ≥65, using a 760 CPM cutpoint.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

University of California, San Diego

Collaborators

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jacqueline Kerr, PhD, University of California, San Diego

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 30, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 30, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

July 1, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 31, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 1, 2017

Last Verified

August 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 3134795
  • 1R01HL098425 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe