Oral Polypodium Leucotomos for Melasma

August 4, 2011 updated by: University of Miami

A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo Controlled Study Evaluating the Effectiveness and Tolerability of Oral Polypodium Leucotomos in Patients With Melasma

Primary Objective: To determine whether there is improvement in the melasma of participants taking oral Polypodium Leucotomos Secondary Objective: To determine whether oral Polypodium Leucotomos is well tolerated in study subjects with melasma.

To determine whether treatment with Polypodium Leucotomos improves the health-related quality of life.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Polypodium Leucotomos is a fern, also known as Calaguala used by the natives of northern Honduras as a treatment against malignant tumors Used in Spain and Central America for the treatment of psoriasis, atopic dermatitis and repigmentation of vitiligo.

Oral Polypodium Leucotomos is safe and effective in patients with melasma.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

21

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33140
        • University of Miami Cosmetic Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy female subjects 18-50 years of age.
  • Female subjects with epidermal melasma.
  • Female subjects of child-bearing potential must have been willing to use an acceptable form of birth control for the duration of the study.
  • Subjects with Fitzpatrick skin types II, III, & IV
  • Subjects enrolled in this trial had a 2 week washout period if on prior treatment for melasma.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or lactating
  • Dermal Melasma
  • Hormonal therapies less than or equal too 4 weeks prior to study
  • Use of photosensitizing medications
  • Simultaneous use of any form of treatment for melasma
  • Subjects who were concurrently receiving light therapies
  • Subjects who were unwilling to limit the amount of sun exposure
  • Simultaneous ( or past 30 day) participation in a clinical research study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Polypodium Leucotomos
Oral Polypodium Leucotomos twice daily plus sunscreen SPF 45 for 12 weeks.
Oral capsule at 240 mg taken twice a day for 12 weeks
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Oral Placebo twice daily plus sunscreen SPF 45 for 12 weeks.
240 mg Placebo taken orally twice daily created by company which manufactured active ingredient

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI)
Time Frame: Day 0, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
The following equation is used to determine the MASI score: MASI = .3A(D+H) [forhead] + .3A(D+H)[right malar] + .3A(D+H)[left malar] + .1A(D+H)[chin]; A = area, D = darkness, and H = homogeneity. Area is based on percentage of the region covered by melasma using a 1-6 scale. Darkness is determined on a 0-3 scale. Homogeneity is based on a 0-4 scale.
Day 0, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Assessment
Time Frame: Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Subject critiqued their melasma as either getting worse, showing no improvement, mild improvement or as showing marked improvement upon using the treatment.
Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Evaluation of Photographs
Time Frame: Post-Week 12
Photos were evaluated using the grading of worse, no improvement, mild improvement or marked improvement comparing week 12 to baseline.
Post-Week 12
Adverse Events
Time Frame: Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Recorded any and all adverse events that occurred even if it was unlikely that it was associated with the study product.
Week 4, Week 8, Week 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 14, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 14, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

July 15, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 5, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 4, 2011

Last Verified

July 1, 2008

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 20070050

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Melasma

Clinical Trials on Polypodium Leucotomos

Subscribe