Depression Treatment for Low Income Substance Users (LET'S ACT)

February 17, 2017 updated by: Stacey Daughters, PhD, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Depression Treatment for Urban Low Income Minority Substance Users

The objective of the current study is to evaluate the effects of a brief, behavioral activation treatment (the Life Enhancement Treatment for Substance Use; LET'S ACT) on long term outcomes of substance use, HIV risk behaviors and mechanisms of treatment response (depressive symptoms, environmental reward, behavioral activation).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Approximately 22% of substance users suffer from elevated depressive symptoms, which is associated with higher rates of substance abuse treatment dropout, relapse to substance use, and HIV risk behavior. Few interventions targeting reinforcement principles have been developed to meet the specific needs of treatment seeking substance users. One approach that may be especially appropriate in this regard is behavioral activation (BA), which aims to increase individuals' engagement in pleasant events, thereby increasing contact with positive reinforcement and decreasing the frequency of aversive events. BA has been shown to be efficacious in the treatment of depression, and this uncomplicated and straightforward approach may be especially appropriate for the specific needs of an inner city low income substance abusing sample. Further, BA compliments standard substance abuse treatment in several key practical and theoretical ways as it is more easily adopted by staff in these settings, more time efficient (e.g., fewer and shorter sessions, group format), more easily understood by patients who suffer from cognitive limitations due to low education level and chronic drug use, and can incorporate aspects of sobriety into its treatment components. In an initial Stage 1 development project, a version of BA, the Life Enhancement Treatment for Substance Use (LETS ACT), was developed and specifically tailored for inner-city low income minority substance users with elevated depressive symptoms. Results demonstrated that LETS ACT led to a significantly greater reduction in self-reported depressive symptoms and a significant increase in enjoyment and reward value of activities as compared to the TAU control group (Daughters et al., 2008). While preliminary findings prove promising, many questions remain unanswered and several extensions of this work are necessary, including an assessment of post treatment substance use and HIV risk behavior, a contact-matched control, and a larger sample size to allow for more complex analyses of the mechanisms underlying these outcomes. Thus, the objective of the present proposal is to follow-up on our previous Stage 1 treatment development efforts and small scale randomized control trial (RCT) with a fully-powered Stage 2 RCT comparing LETS ACT to nondirective therapy (NDT) among a sample of 263 low income depressed substance users currently receiving residential substance abuse treatment in inner-city Washington, DC.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

263

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20002
        • Salvation Army Harbor Light Treatment Center
    • Maryland
      • College Park, Maryland, United States, 20742
        • University of Maryland

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • between 18 and 65 years of age
  • beginning their last month of residential treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • limited mental competency [Mini Mental State Examination score < 23]
  • psychosis
  • the use of psychotropic medication for < 3 months
  • the inability to give informed, voluntary, written consent to participate

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: LETS ACT Behavioral Activation Treatment
LETS ACT is based on the empirically validated Behavioral Activation Treatment for Depression (BAT-D; Lejuez, Hopko, & Hopko, 2001). LETS ACT is based on the belief that the best way to improve mood, remain sober, and to make long-term life changes is by changing and increasing one's activity level. It has been modified to accommodate the needs of a substance using population currently receiving inpatient substance use treatment. Treatment is provided over a 4-week period and is provided in small group format, with each group consisting of 3-5 patients.
LETS ACT is based on the empirically validated Behavioral Activation Treatment for Depression (BAT-D; Lejuez, Hopko, & Hopko, 2001). Treatment includes eight sessions over a four-week period and is provided in small group format, with each group consisting of 3-5 patients.
Other Names:
  • LETS ACT
  • Behavioral Activation
Placebo Comparator: Nondirective Therapy (NDT)
In NDT, the therapist will create an accepting, nonjudgmental, empathic environment to continuously direct client attention to primary feelings, and to facilitate accepting of affective experience using supportive statements, reflective listening, and empathic communications. Treatment is provided over a 4-week period and is provided in small group format, with each group consisting of 3-5 patients.
The purpose of Nondirective Therapy (NDT) is to provide group therapy interaction, allowing for the development of a close therapeutic relationship and a safe and accepting environment to facilitate change. NDT will be conducted as outlined by Crits-Cristoph (1997). That is, the therapist will create an accepting, nonjudgmental, empathic environment to continuously direct client attention to primary feelings, and to facilitate accepting of affective experience using supportive statements, reflective listening, and empathic communications. Patients will received NDT in a small group format (3-5 participants) and will meet over the course of 4 weeks.
Other Names:
  • Supportive Counseling

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Substance Use
Time Frame: baseline to a 12-month post treatment follow up period
Urine Screen and Timeline Followback
baseline to a 12-month post treatment follow up period
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II; Beck et al., 1996)
Time Frame: BDI-II will be evaluated from baseline to a 12-month follow up period
The Beck Depression Inventory is a 21-item self-report measure of depressive symptoms.
BDI-II will be evaluated from baseline to a 12-month follow up period

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale (BADS)
Time Frame: baseline to a 12-month post treatment follow up period
level of activation and avoidance behaviors
baseline to a 12-month post treatment follow up period
Reward Probability Index (RPI)
Time Frame: baseline to a 12-month post treatment follow up period
contact with environmental reward
baseline to a 12-month post treatment follow up period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Stacey B Daughters, Ph.D., University of Maryland, College Park

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 24, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 25, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

August 26, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 23, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2017

Last Verified

February 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • R01DA026424 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Substance Use Disorder

Clinical Trials on LETS ACT Behavioral Activation Treatment

3
Subscribe