Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Paricalcitol Injection With Maxacalcitol Injection in Adult Japanese Chronic Kidney Disease Subjects Receiving Hemodialysis With Secondary Hyperparathyroidism

April 17, 2013 updated by: AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott)
This study is a comparison of the efficacy and safety of paricalcitol injection with maxacalcitol injection in adult Japanese chronic kidney disease patients receiving hemodialysis with secondary hyperparathyroidism. The main objective of this study is to demonstrate the efficacy of paricalcitol injection in reducing levels of parathyroid hormone without clinically significant hypercalcemia, compared to maxacalcitol injection.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

255

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Aichi, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 53485
      • Chiba, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 51571
      • Chiba, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 52963
      • Chiba, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 52966
      • Gifu, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 51578
      • Gunma, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 52965
      • Hadano-City, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 53782
      • Himeji-City, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 57483
      • Hokkaido, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 57487
      • Hyogo, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 53484
      • Ibaraki, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 54385
      • Kagawa, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 51581
      • Kagoshima, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 59164
      • Kanagawa, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 51574
      • Kanagawa, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 51575
      • Kodaira, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 52751
      • Koga, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 62025
      • Matsumoto, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 54384
      • Midori, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 52745
      • Mito, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 51569
      • Nagano, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 52964
      • Nagano, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 53483
      • Nagasaki, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 51582
      • Nagoya, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 54388
      • Niigata, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 51576
      • Niigata, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 51577
      • Osaka, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 51580
      • Osaka, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 52747
      • Osaka, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 52748
      • Osaka, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 52750
      • Saitama, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 51570
      • Sakai, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 54387
      • Sapporo, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 52746
      • Shizuoka, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 51579
      • Takasaki, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 62024
      • Tokyo, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 51572
      • Tokyo, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 52752
      • Tokyo, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 53482
      • Tokyo, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 59162
      • Tokyo, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 59966
      • Tomakomai-shi, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 53783
      • Toyama, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 54383
      • Wakayama, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 52749
      • Yachiyoshi, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 52962
      • Yokohama-Shi, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 59163

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage 5 patients undergoing dialysis with stable dialysate calcium and phosphate binders
  • On three times weekly hemodialysis for at least 3 months prior with intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) greater than or equal to 300 pg/mL, adjusted normalized serum total calcium (Ca) greater than or equal to 8.4 to less than 10.2 mg/dL, serum phosphorus (P) less than or equal to 6.5 mg/dL.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a recent history of severe cardiovascular or hepatic disease, uncontrolled hypertension or uncontrolled diabetes
  • Patients who have received a parathyroidectomy or ethanol infusion within the prior year
  • Patients taking drugs that affect iPTH, calcium or bone metabolism
  • Patients who will need to take chronic doses (greater than or equal to 2 consecutive weeks) of cytochrome P450 inhibitors (e.g., clarithromycin, grapefruit products) or inducers (e.g., carbamazepine, rifampicin)
  • Female patients who are pregnant, possibly pregnant, wish to become pregnant, or participate in breastfeeding during the study period.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Paricalcitol
Participants received paricalcitol at an initial dose of 2 µg, and maxacalcitol placebo administered 3 times per week at each hemodialysis via intravenous catheter for 12 weeks. After 2 weeks the dose could be adjusted ± 1 µg based on protocol-specified criteria up to a maximum of 7 µg.
Other Names:
  • Zemplar
  • ABT-358
Active Comparator: Maxacalcitol
Participants received maxacalcitol at an initial dose of 5 µg (iPTH < 500 pg/mL at Screening) or 10 µg (iPTH ≥ 500 pg/mL at Screening), and paricalcitol placebo administered 3 times per week at each hemodialysis via intravenous catheter for 12 weeks. After 2 weeks the dose could be adjusted ± 2.5 µg based on protocol-specified criteria up to a maximum of 20 µg.
Other Names:
  • oxarol

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Target Intact Parathyroid Hormone (iPTH) and Without Hypercalcemia
Time Frame: iPTH measured during the last three weeks of treatment (Weeks 11, 12, and 13). Calcium measured throughout the study (Weeks 1-13).
The target iPTH range was 60-180 pg/mL, based on the average of the last 3 weeks of treatment, and with no hypercalcemia during the treatment phase. Hypercalcemia was defined as at least 1 corrected calcium value > 11.0 mg/dL or at least 2 corrected calcium values ≥ 10.5 mg/dL. iPTH was measured before the first dialysis session of each week and analyzed by the central laboratory.
iPTH measured during the last three weeks of treatment (Weeks 11, 12, and 13). Calcium measured throughout the study (Weeks 1-13).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Intact Parathyroid Hormone (iPTH) From Baseline and With No Hypercalcemia
Time Frame: Baseline to the last three weeks of treatment (Weeks 11, 12, and 13) for iPTH. Calcium measured throughout the study (Weeks 1-13).
The percentage of participants with greater than or equal to 50% reduction in intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) from baseline to the average of the last 3 weeks of treatment and with no hypercalcemia during the treatment phase. iPTH was measured before the first dialysis session of each week and analyzed by the central laboratory. Hypercalcemia was defined as at least 1 corrected calcium value > 11.0 mg/dL or at least 2 corrected calcium values ≥ 10.5 mg/dL.
Baseline to the last three weeks of treatment (Weeks 11, 12, and 13) for iPTH. Calcium measured throughout the study (Weeks 1-13).
Percentage of Participants With Target Intact Parathyroid Hormone (iPTH)
Time Frame: The last three weeks of treatment (Weeks 11, 12, and 13)
The target iPTH range was 60-180 pg/mL, based on the average of the last 3 weeks of treatment. iPTH was measured before the first dialysis session of each week and analyzed by the central laboratory.
The last three weeks of treatment (Weeks 11, 12, and 13)
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Intact Parathyroid Hormone (iPTH) From Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline to the last three weeks of treatment (Weeks 11, 12, and 13)
The percentage of participants with a greater than or equal to 50% reduction in intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) from baseline to the average of the last 3 weeks of treatment. iPTH was measured before the first dialysis session of each week and analyzed by the central laboratory.
Baseline to the last three weeks of treatment (Weeks 11, 12, and 13)
Number of Visits at Which Participants Achieved iPTH Control With ≥ 50% Reduction in Intact Parathyroid Hormone (iPTH) From Baseline
Time Frame: Weeks 2 to 13
iPTH control was defined as a ≥ 50% reduction from baseline. iPTH was measured before the first dialysis session of the week, each week during the treatment phase and analyzed by the central laboratory.
Weeks 2 to 13
Number of Visits at Which Participants Achieved iPTH Control in the Target Range of 60 to 180 pg/mL
Time Frame: Weeks 2 to 13
iPTH control was defined as being within the target range of 60 to 180 pg/mL. iPTH was measured before the first dialysis session of the week, once a week during the treatment phase and analyzed by the central laboratory.
Weeks 2 to 13

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Kazuya Kobayashi, BA, AbbVie GK.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 25, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 25, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

April 26, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 6, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2013

Last Verified

April 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hemodialysis

Clinical Trials on paricalcitol

Subscribe