Improving Parent Understanding of Instructions About Asthma Care

October 4, 2018 updated by: NYU Langone Health

Asthma has an especially great impact on poor urban children and their families. In addition to higher asthma prevalence and morbidity, those in low SES urban areas are at risk for low health literacy. Low health literacy is associated with poorer asthma outcomes. The provision of a written asthma action plan has been shown to help with asthma management and to reduce hospitalizations and ER visits. Poor urban families who may have low literacy may need an alternative asthma action plan to convey the treatment plan.

This pilot study proposes to investigate whether a plain language asthma action plan can improve parent understanding and adherence with medication instructions, compared to standard written materials, among parents of children with asthma. This is an RCT in which parents of children with asthma will be randomized to either receive a pictogram-based low literacy asthma action plan, or a standard action plan (AAAAI), to examine whether those who receive the low literacy plan have improved asthma action plan knowledge when presented with a hypothetical scenario.

A second part of the study is to examine whether providers who are given the pictogram-based low literacy asthma action plan will be more likely to counsel about certain aspects of asthma management (eg. need for daily medications even when sick, spacer use, confusion between everyday and rescue inhaler)compared to providers who receive use a standard action plan (AAAAI). This is an RCT in which pediatric providers are randomized to counsel a hypothetical patient using the pictogram-based action plan or the standard action plan (AAAAI).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

449

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10016
        • NYU School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Parent study:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Primary caregiver / parent / legal guardian of child 2-12 years old
  • Child with diagnosis of asthma

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Parent not English or Spanish-speaking

Provider study:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Health providers who care for children with asthma

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: AAAAI Action Plan
Asthma Action Plan from the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology
Experimental: Asthma pictogram written action plan
Cartoon/pictogram-based written action plan sheet
Asthma action plan using plain language, pictograms, and photographs

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Asthma Action Plan knowledge (parent)
Time Frame: 1 day (on same day of enrollment; no outcome assessment after day of enrollment)
Outcome measure will be assessed on the day of enrollment only, using a hypothetical scenario. No outcome assessments will be performed after the day of enrollment.
1 day (on same day of enrollment; no outcome assessment after day of enrollment)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Asthma action plan content (provider)
Time Frame: same day as presentation of hypothetical counseling scenario
Provider coverage of green/yellow/red zone concepts, spacer use, medication information, symptoms; use of low literacy principles
same day as presentation of hypothetical counseling scenario

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Suzy Tomopoulos, MD, NYU School of Medicine
  • Principal Investigator: Shonna (Hsiang) Yin, MD, NYU School of Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 26, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 28, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

July 29, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 5, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 4, 2018

Last Verified

October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Asthma

Clinical Trials on AAAAI standard of care written action plan

3
Subscribe