Simulation Training vs Workplace-Based Supervision in Psychiatry (EPIC-OSkER)

September 6, 2011 updated by: King's College London

A Randomised Trial of Simulation Training vs Workplace-Based Supervision for Junior Doctors in Psychiatry

The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of two forms of clinical skills training for teaching emergency psychiatry skills to doctors who have just started to work in psychiatry

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Junior doctors starting work in psychiatry soon encounter a number of situations in the workplace for which they have had little or no preparation either at medical school or from work in other specialities. They will encounter clinically complex situations such as rapid tranquillisation, crisis presentations of self-harm, suicide risk assessment, overseeing supervised confinement and making decisions to admit or discharge mentally ill patients. Furthermore, many of these situations occur out of hours when there is little direct senior supervision available. The traditional induction programme is delivered in a didactic format, which does not encourage effective learning, nor does it allow any opportunity to practise or acquire hands-on skills or non-technical skills such as interprofessional communication, leadership and situational awareness. In the interests of patient safety and improving the quality of care and patient's experience, there is an urgent need to identify ways of improving induction and quickly equipping junior doctors with the clinical skills necessary to practise safely in psychiatry. We propose to evaluate and compare two approached to improved skills training in psychiatry: 1. workplace-based observation and feedback; 2. simulation training.

All new junior doctors starting work in the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK, in August 2011 will be invited to take part in a randomised controlled trial of training in addition to the standard induction. Following a day of lectures on relevant clinical topics, participants will be randomly allocated to receive either observed workplace-based training by a more senior doctor during their on-call duties, or a two-day simulation-based training course. Before and after the training, assessments of participants' clinical skills and attitudes will be carried out by questionnaires and by observations of simulated clinical encounters. Changes in performance will be compared between the two groups. Longer term evaluation will be carried out by means of qualitative interviews and simulated clinical encounters once participants have been working for several months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

48

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • London, United Kingdom, SE5 9RJ
        • Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

22 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Junior doctors starting work at the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust in August 2011 in any of the following grades: 1. Core Psychiatric Training; 2. Foundation Training; 3. General Practice Vocational Training; 4. Core Trainee 1-3 equivalent posts, e.g. long-term locums

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unwillingness to participate in the study
  • Inability to attend the training programme or participate in the evaluation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: OSkER
"Observed SKills in the Emergency Room" - workplace-based supervision.
For four weeks, participants will be accompanied by a senior psychiatric registrar or consultant psychiatrist, who has received training in giving feedback, during their on-call duties. Each participant will receive between 8-12 hours of 1:1 training.
Experimental: EPIC
"Emergency Psychiatry Immersion Course" - simulation-based training.
A two-day simulation-based training course covering assessment of self-harm, capacity, managing aggression, working with the emergency team and medical emergencies in the psychiatric hospital

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in global clinical skills
Time Frame: Baseline; 4 weeks; 16 weeks
Participants will participate in a single simulated clinical encounter. Encounters will be video-recorded and then rated by observers, who are blind to the allocation status and time point of each video, using a global rating scale.
Baseline; 4 weeks; 16 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in technical clinical skills
Time Frame: Baseline; 4 weeks; 16 weeks
Participants will participate in a single simulated clinical encounter. Encounters will be video-recorded and then rated by observers, who are blind to the allocation status and time point of each video, using a checklist-based rating scale.
Baseline; 4 weeks; 16 weeks
Change in attitudes towards teamworking
Time Frame: Baseline; 4 weeks; 16 weeks
The Operating Room Management Attitudes Questionnaire will be modified to be appropriate for working in psychiatry.
Baseline; 4 weeks; 16 weeks
Change in attitudes towards self-harm
Time Frame: Baseline; 4 weeks; 16 weeks
The Attitudes to Deliberate Self-Harm Questionnaire
Baseline; 4 weeks; 16 weeks
Self-reported views on usefulness and acceptability of the training programmes
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Post-course feedback questionnaire
4 weeks
Qualitative evaluation
Time Frame: 8 - 12 weeks
Focus groups will be conducted to evaluate how participants have learned to manage psychiatric emergencies, and the contribution of the courses to their learning.
8 - 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2011

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 12, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 12, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

August 15, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 7, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 6, 2011

Last Verified

August 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Clinical Skills Training

Clinical Trials on Observed SKills in the Emergency Room

3
Subscribe