Training of Graduate Students in General Psychotherapeutic Skills (TRIPS) (TRIPS)

December 4, 2021 updated by: Ole Karkov Østergård, Aalborg University

The Effect of Deliberate Practice Training of Graduate Students in General Psychotherapeutic Skills Compared to Theoretical Teaching: the Randomized Controlled TRIPS Trial

In this study, a deliberate practice-based approach to therapist training will be compared to theoretical teaching. The main hypothesis is that deliberate practice training will result in a larger improvement in students' observer-rated interpersonal skills. About 200 graduate students from two Danish universities will be randomized into two groups, a) deliberate practice training of non-specific psychotherapeutic skills using role-play and Theravue, an online skill-building system with therapy videos; or b) theoretical teaching. Each condition consists of 15 hours of classroom participation and homework. The study has the potential to transform the training of psychotherapy skills.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Background: Psychology students at universities in Denmark and worldwide only receive little clinical training, even though such training is crucial to psychologists' job performance after graduation. Training non-specific psychotherapeutic skills, such as being empathic and facilitating the therapeutic alliance, is critical since these skills are related to psychotherapy outcomes. In this study, a deliberate practice approach to training will be compared to theoretical teaching.

Hypothesis: The first and main hypothesis is that the students' observer-rated Facilitative Interpersonal Skills (FIS) will improve significantly more after deliberate practice training compared to theoretical teaching. The second hypothesis is that students' self-reported Facilitative Interpersonal Skills (FIS-SR), self-efficacy, and empathy will increase significantly more after training compared to theoretical teaching. The third hypothesis is that students reporting higher baseline levels of self-affiliation, attachment security, external feedback propensity, and self-efficacy will have a larger increase in FIS after the training program. The fourth hypothesis is that the amount of deliberate practice will predict improvement in FIS at post-training, whereas the students' sociodemographic characteristics, previous experience with psychotherapy, and preferred psychotherapy approach will not be associated with improvement in FIS.

Methods: One hundred ninety-eight graduate students from the Universities of Copenhagen and Aalborg University will be randomized into two groups, a) deliberate practice training of non-specific skills using role-play and Theravue, or b) theoretical teaching. Group a will first receive the experimental condition (deliberate practice), followed by the control condition, while group b will receive the conditions in reverse order. Each condition consists of 15 hours of classroom participation and homework. The primary outcome is Facilitative Interpersonal Skills - Observer. Secondary outcomes include the Facilitative Interpersonal Skills-Self-Report, the Counselor Activity Self-Efficacy Scales, and the Interpersonal Reactivity Index. Outcomes will be measured at baseline (week 0), after the first condition (week 5; before the crossover, reflecting true randomization), and after both conditions (week 10). Main outcome analyses will be performed at week 5.

To test deliberate practice as a predictor of FIS improvement, the amount of deliberate practice activity is measured on a self-report questionnaire developed for this study and tracked on Theravue as a) the total time spent on watching and responding to therapy videos and b) the average number of attempts to improve the response to each therapy video. The Structural Analysis of Social Behavior Intrex questionnaire (SASB; Benjamin, 2000), the Social Skills Inventory (SSI; Riggio, 1989), the Experiences in Close Relationships Scale (ECR; Brennan et al., 1998), and the Internal and External Feedback Propensity Scales (IEFPS; Herold et al., 1996) will be measured at week 0 and explored as possible between-condition moderators of the outcome. The Group Climate Questionnaire-Short Form (GCQ-S; MacKenzie, 1983) will be used to measure the collaboration in the student groups, where approximately five students work together throughout the study period, performing role-plays and giving peer feedback in the experimental condition, and discussing theory in the control condition. The observer-rated DP Coach Competency Scale (DPCCS; Rousmaniere, 2020) will be used to evaluate adherence and quality of the deliberate practice training. Stig Bernt Poulsen, University of Copenhagen, and Ole Karkov Østergård, Aalborg University, are co-principal investigators.

Discussion: The study can potentially transform the training of psychotherapy, not only for psychology students but also for psychologists in general. Furthermore, the results of the study can be transferred to the training of other clinical skills.

Ethics: Ethical approval has been obtained from the Institutional Ethical Review Board, Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, and Aalborg University. Before signing up for the course, the students will be informed about the course and the research embedded herein. Informed consent will be obtained from students agreeing to participate in the study. Course participants can decline to participate in the study without negative consequences for their course participation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

198

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Denmark
      • Aalborg 9000, Denmark
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Communication and Psychology, Aalborg University, Rendsburggade 14
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Kristine K. Nilsson, PhD
      • Copenhagen, Denmark
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 2A
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Jan Nielsen, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Graduate psychology students attending a 30-hour elective course in clinical psychology called "Deliberate practice training of general psychotherapeutic skills" at two universities in Denmark (i.e., Department of Communication and Psychology at Aalborg University and the Department of Psychology at the University of Copenhagen).
  • All participants hold a Bachelor of Science in psychology.
  • Signed informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Course participants who are declining to participate in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Deliberate practice training
The experimental condition consists of deliberate practice training of non-specific psychotherapy skills using role-play and Theravue, an online skill-building system with therapy videos.
Other: Deliberate practice training
The experimental condition consists of five weeks of deliberate practice training of non-specific psychotherapy skills organized as (1) classroom training and (2) homework. The classroom training consists of 15 hours (5 days x 3 hours) of deliberate practice training. Each day will be organized around a theme: (a) Empathy, (b) establishing the therapeutic alliance, (c) working with alliance ruptures, (d) formulation of an interpersonal focus, and (e) clinical expertise - a synthesis. The training will include theoretical introductions, students defining individual training goals, model responses of good psychotherapeutic skills, and student role-play. Regarding homework, after each of the five classes, the students will use Theravue to watch and respond to three therapy videos related to the theme of the previous class. The students have to deliver at least two new responses to each video informed by feedback from teachers and peers and a checklist describing a "good response."
Active Comparator: Theoretical teaching
The control condition will consist of theoretical teaching of non-specific psychotherapy skills.
Other: Theoretical teaching
The control condition will consist of five weeks of theoretical teaching of non-specific psychotherapy skills performed as (1) classroom teaching and (2) homework. Regarding classroom teaching, the 15 hours (5 days x 3 hours) of teaching will be organized around the same five themes as the experimental condition (see points a-d above). The class will consist of the teacher's presentation of theory and research findings, videos with master therapists defining core concepts, and group discussions of literature. Regarding homework, the participants will read literature and use a restricted version of Theravue to complete home assignments where they record their answers to three theoretical questions related to the theme of the preceding classroom teaching.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Facilitative Interpersonal Skills - Observer (FIS; Anderson & Patterson, 2013)
Time Frame: Three different sets, each consisting of three FIS videos, will be presented to each student three times in randomized order: at baseline (week 0), after the first condition (week 5), and after the second condition (week 10)
FIS measures relationship skills exhibited in psychotherapy. The therapists are asked to respond as helpfully as possible to video clips simulating challenging therapy situations. FIS has eight dimensions: (1) verbal fluency; (2) hope and positive expectations; (3) persuasiveness; (4) emotional expression; (5) warmth, acceptance, and understanding; (6) empathy; (7) alliance-bond capacity; and (8) alliance rupture-repair responsiveness. The items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 = skill deficit to 5 = optimal presence of skill.
Three different sets, each consisting of three FIS videos, will be presented to each student three times in randomized order: at baseline (week 0), after the first condition (week 5), and after the second condition (week 10)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Facilitative Interpersonal Skills-Self-Report (FIS-SR, Anderson, et al., 2020)
Time Frame: Immediately after replying to the FIS videos at week 0, week 5, and week 10
FIS-SR measures self-evaluated relationship skills. Following participation in the FIS task, participants rate their performance on the eight FIS dimensions mentioned above. Participants rate the extent to which they believe that their FIS responses were verbally fluent, communicated hope and positive expectations, etc., on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree.
Immediately after replying to the FIS videos at week 0, week 5, and week 10
Change in Counselor Activity Self-Efficacy Scales (CASES; Lent et al., 2003)
Time Frame: Week 0, week 5, and week 10
The CASES measure therapist's experience of self-efficacy within various domains. The present study uses the 15 items measuring Helping Skill Self-Efficacy, and the 10 items measuring Session Management Self-Efficacy. Each item is rated on a 10-point Likert scale ranging from 0 = no confidence to 9 = complete confidence.
Week 0, week 5, and week 10
Change in Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI; Davis, 1983).
Time Frame: Week 0, week 5, and week 10
The IRI is a self-report measure of empathy, including both cognitive and emotional dimensions. The IRI has 28 items, each rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 = does not describe me well to 4 = does describe me very well.
Week 0, week 5, and week 10

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Aalborg University

Collaborators

University of Copenhagen

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ole K. Østergård, PhD, Department of Communication and Psychology, Aalborg University.
  • Principal Investigator: Stig B. Poulsen, Professor, Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 15, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 10, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

December 20, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 20, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2021

Last Verified

December 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 201891619

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Deliberate Practice Training of Psychotherapeutic Skills

Clinical Trials on Deliberate practice training

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Saint Lucia

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe