Diagnosis of Gastric Lesions From Exhaled Breath and Saliva

May 7, 2020 updated by: Hu Liu, Anhui Medical University

Study of the Exhaled Breath and Salivary Metabolites of Patients With Malignant or Benign Gasctric Lesions

The investigators study the feasibility of a novel method in oncology based on breath analysis with a nanosensors array for identifying gastric diseases. Alveolar exhaled breath samples collected from volunteers referred for upper endoscopy or surgery are analyzed using a custom-designed array of chemical nanosensors based on organically functionalized gold nanoparticles and carbon nanotubes. Predictive models are built employing discriminant factor analysis (DFA) pattern recognition method. Classification accuracy, sensitivity and specificity are determined using leave-one-out cross-validation or an independent blind test set. The chemical composition of the breath samples is studied using gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (GC-MS).

A pilot study is conducted first (enlistment of 160 subjects at the Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.)

The pilot study is followed by a large-scale clinical trial to confirm the preliminary results of the Chinese pilot study (enlistment of 800 subjects at the Digestive Diseases Centre GASTRO, Riga East University Hospital, 6 Linezera iela, LV1006 Riga, Latvia). 25% of the samples are used as independent blind test set. The samples are blinded by the medical team and are not disclosed until prediction of blind sample identity is complete.

To further prove the diagnosis of GC from exhaled breath and seek the interrelationship among Breathomics, metabolomics and transcriptomics, saliva samples from about 200 patients are collected from volunteers referred for upper endoscopy or surgery are analyzed using Ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS). Simultaneously, RNA sequencing are preformed on gastric cancer tissue samples and paracancerous tissue samples collected from same group of volunteers. The data of salivary metabonomics and transcriptomics were integrated and analyzed on the on Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes to confirm the diagnostic validity of salivary metabonomics.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Number of patients that will have a definitive diagnosis and Alveolar exhaled breath samples collected from individuals with Tedlar® bags (Keika Ventures, LLC) after endoscopy.. Two breath samples were collected from each person tested.

Two-bed sorption tubes filled with the following sorbents were used as traps for sample collection with simultaneous preconcentration: 100mg matrix Tenax TA and 50mg matrix Tenax TA (35-60 mesh; purchased from Supelo, Bellefonte, PA). Sorbents were separated by glass wool. The samples were collected at a total flow through sorption trap of 200ml/min.

One sample was used for analysis with the nanosensors array, and the other sample was used for Gas Chromatography coupled with Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis.

Cancer tissue and paracancerous tissue samples were collected in the process of surgical resection. After collection in the operating room, the samples were immediately placed in - 5 ℃ dry ice and transferred to the laboratory. Then, the samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen for 30 minutes, and then placed in - 80℃ freezer for cold storage. After that, the samples were divided into several batches and transported in dry ice for subsequent transcriptome analysis. All the saliva samples were collected using 2ml cryopreservation tube during early morning before surgery or endoscopic resection. The patient had been told not to eat after 22 o'clock the night, and not to drink water, smoke, brush teeth or exercise violently one hour before the collection. The saliva samples were sealed in the -80 C refrigerator after collection and then transported in a foam box equipped with dry ice, followed by UHPLC-MS analysis.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

1000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Anhui
      • Hefei, Anhui, China, 230032
        • Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University
      • Riga, Latvia, LV1006
        • Faculty of Medicine, University of Latvia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

160 volunteers who undergo gastroscopy examination in The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University,Hefei,China and 800 patients with dyspeptic symptoms referred for upper endoscopy or patients suspected for gastric cancer referred for surgery in the clinical sites of University of Latvia (Riga East University hospital and/or Digestive Diseases Centre GASTRO), Riga, Latvia

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18-75 years
  • Gastric cancer, gastric ulcer, gastritis,
  • No previous adjuvant treatment (surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy)
  • Gastric lesions are diagnosed by gastroendoscopy and histopathologic.
  • ECOG < 2

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other palliative chemotherapy and radiotherapy for this cancer
  • Other cancer
  • diabetes , Fatty liver
  • Autoimmune disease
  • Ventilation and transaired function obstacle

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
gastric cancer
gastritis
gastric ulcer
normal

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Discrimination between Malignant and Benign Gastric Lesions with Na-nose
Time Frame: 2 weeks after the collection of breath

Proof-of-concept:

Alveolar exhaled breath samples collected from 160 subjects referred for upper endoscopy at The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University are analyzed using a custom-designed array of chemical nanosensors. Predictive models are built employing discriminant factor analysis (DFA). Classification accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were determined using leave-one-out cross-validation. The chemical composition is studied using gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (GC-MS).

Confirmation of proof-of-concept:

Alveolar exhaled breath samples collected from 800 subjects referred for upper endoscopy at Riga East University Hospital are analyzed as was used in the pilot study. Predictive models are built as in the pilot study,using a training set of only 75% of the samples. Classification accuracy, sensitivity and specificity are determined using an independent blind test set (25% of the samples)

2 weeks after the collection of breath

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Geographical comparison of VOCs between China and Latvia
Time Frame: 2 weeks after the data analyses
Specifically, to compare the VOCs that distinguish between malignant and benign gastric lesions in the Chinese and Latvian cohorts. The cohorts from China and Latvia are matched in terms of sample size, gender ratio, average age, and smoking habits.
2 weeks after the data analyses

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proof seeking from metabolomics and transcriptomics
Time Frame: 2 weeks after the data analyses

Salivary samples collected from 200 subjects referred for upper endoscopy or surgery are analyzed using Ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS). Predictive models are built employing discriminant factor analysis (DFA). Classification accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were determined using leave-one-out cross-validation.

Data from breathomics, salivary metabonomics and transcriptomics are integrated to seek the proof of breath diagnosis at different levels.

2 weeks after the data analyses

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hu Liu, M.D., The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei,China

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

January 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 18, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 18, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

August 19, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 8, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 7, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stomach Diseases

3
Subscribe