Comparison of Four Different Recruitment Maneuvers in Patients After Coronary Surgery (RECR-CABG)

June 24, 2013 updated by: Vsevolod V. Kuzkov, Northern State Medical University

Comparison of Different Types of Postoperative Pulmonary Recruitment and Predicting Its Efficacy Following Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

The risk of respiratory failure after cardiac surgery is high, and it may result in many complications. The maneuver of alveolar recruitment may improve the oxygen transport in the human organism. The investigators compare three different types of alveolar recruitment in patient after cardiac surgery, to reveal which one is better.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The study compares three different approaches to alveolar recruitment maneuvers in the immediate postoperative period after off-pump coronary bypass grafting.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

76

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arkhangelsk region
      • Arkhangelsk, Arkhangelsk region, Russian Federation, 163000
        • City hospital # 1

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 18 and 75
  • Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting
  • Possibility to discontinue respiratory support in the first day after intervention

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Signs of ARDS
  • COPD in decompensation phase
  • Requirement for inotropic support(epinephrine >0,1 mcg/kg/hr)
  • Bronchiectases
  • Pregnancy
  • Morbid obesity
  • Aortic aneurism
  • AMI in previous month

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Recruitment 40x40
The group where recruitment is performed by increase in airway pressure up to 40 cm H2O for 40 seconds

Four approaches:

  1. CPAP 40 cm H2O
  2. Peak pressure 40 cm H2O
  3. PEEP 15 cm H2O for 300 sec
  4. no intervention (controls)
Other Names:
  • CPAP40
  • PEAK40
  • PEEP15
  • CONTROLS
Active Comparator: Recruitment PEAK40
Increase in peak airway pressure up to 40 cm H2O during tidal ventilation

Four approaches:

  1. CPAP 40 cm H2O
  2. Peak pressure 40 cm H2O
  3. PEEP 15 cm H2O for 300 sec
  4. no intervention (controls)
Other Names:
  • CPAP40
  • PEAK40
  • PEEP15
  • CONTROLS
Active Comparator: Recruitment 15x300
Recruitment by increase in airway PEEP up to 15 cm H2O for 300 sec

Four approaches:

  1. CPAP 40 cm H2O
  2. Peak pressure 40 cm H2O
  3. PEEP 15 cm H2O for 300 sec
  4. no intervention (controls)
Other Names:
  • CPAP40
  • PEAK40
  • PEEP15
  • CONTROLS
Active Comparator: No recruitment
No recruitment is performed: standard respiratory support.

Four approaches:

  1. CPAP 40 cm H2O
  2. Peak pressure 40 cm H2O
  3. PEEP 15 cm H2O for 300 sec
  4. no intervention (controls)
Other Names:
  • CPAP40
  • PEAK40
  • PEEP15
  • CONTROLS

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Respiratory support
Time Frame: 24 hrs
The duration of the postoperative respiratory support
24 hrs

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The incidence of postoperative atelectasis
Time Frame: 24 hrs
Incidence of atelectases during 24 hrs
24 hrs
Incidence of reintubation
Time Frame: 24 Hrs
24 Hrs
Oxygenation
Time Frame: 12 hrs after extubation
Changes in PaO2/FiO2 ratio
12 hrs after extubation
Length of ICU and hospital stay
Time Frame: 28 Days
Length of ICU and hospital stay
28 Days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Mikhail Y. Kirov, MD, PhD, Northern State Medical University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 20, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 21, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

October 24, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 25, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 24, 2013

Last Verified

June 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RECR-CABG-2010

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Recruitment

Clinical Trials on Alveolar recruitment

Subscribe