Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Pain Due to Propofol Injection

October 31, 2011 updated by: Shivakumar M C, MD, KVG Medical College and Hospital

Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Pain Due to Propofol Injection:A Randomised, Double-blind, Controlled Clinical Trial

Propofol is commonly used IV anesthetic, it has been formulated in a concentration of 10 mg/ml in a fat emulsion consisting of 10% soybean oil (long-chain triglycerides). When used for anesthetic induction, propofol causes pain on injection in 28%-90% of patients. pain probably results from a direct irritant effect. Several methods have been used to reduce this pain. Lidocaine pretreatment has been commonly proposed to decrease propofol induced pain, but its failure rate is between 13-32%. Dexmedetomidine is highly selective alfa-2 adrenoreceptor agonist. Alpha-2 receptors are located on blood vessels where they inhibit norepinephrine release. Investigators, therefore, speculated that dexmedetomidine could attenuate the pain due to injection of propofol. Investigators conducted a study to determine the efficacy of dexmedetomidine in decreasing pain due to injection of propofol.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Propofol solution is fat emulsion consisting of soyabean oil. When used for anesthetic induction, propofol causes pain or discomfort on injection. Many factors appear to affect the incidence of pain, which includes site of injection, size of vein, speed of injection, buffering effect of blood, temperature and composition of propofol solution and concomitant use of drugs such as local anaesthetics and opiates.

Pain on injection of propofol can be immediate or delayed. Immediate pain probably results from a direct irritant effect whereas delayed pain probably results from an indirect effect via the kinin cascade. Delayed pain has latency of between 10 and 20 s. The pain produced is usually described as tingling, cold, or numbing, at its worst, a severe burning pain proximal to the site of injection. This sensation tends to occur within 10-20 s of injection and lasts only for the duration of injection. Despite this discomfort, the incidence of phlebitis is less than 1%.

Several methods have been used to reduce this pain with limited success. Lidocaine pretreatment is commonly used to decrease propofol induced pain, but its failure rate is between 13-32%.

Dexmedetomidine is an selective alfa-2 adrenoreceptor agonist with supraspinal, spinal, and peripheral actions. Alpha-2 receptors are located on blood vessels where they inhibit norepinephrine release. Investigators, therefore, speculated that dexmedetomidine could attenuate the pain due to injection of propofol.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ASA I & II
  • Both gender
  • Age 18-60
  • Elective surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients taking sedatives or analgesics in the past 24 hours
  • History of allergic reactions to anesthetic drugs,
  • Atrio-ventricular conduction defects
  • Cardiovascular disease and
  • Pregnant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Group NS
Patients were randomly assigned in to three groups of 50 each using a computer-generated table of random numbers. Patients Group NS were injected intravenously with 10 ml of normal saline before injection of propofol.
Patients were randomly assigned in to three groups of 50 each using a computer-generated table of random numbers. Patients Group NS were injected intravenously with 10 ml of normal saline before injection of propofol.
Other Names:
  • Group NS
Active Comparator: Group D25
Patients were randomly assigned in to three groups of 50 each using a computer-generated table of random numbers. Patients Group D25 were injected intravenously with 0.25mic/kg of dexmedetomidine diluted with normal saline into 10ml before injection of propofol.
Patients were randomly assigned in to three groups of 50 each using a computer-generated table of random numbers. Patients Group D25 were injected intravenously with 0.25mic/kg of dexmedetomidine diluted with normal saline into 10ml before injection of propofol.
Other Names:
  • dexmedetomidine
Active Comparator: Group D50
Patients were randomly assigned in to three groups of 50 each using a computer-generated table of random numbers. Patients Group D50 were injected intravenously with 0.50mic/kg of dexmedetomidine diluted with normal saline into 10ml before injection of propofol.
Patients were randomly assigned in to three groups of 50 each using a computer-generated table of random numbers. Patients Group D50 were injected intravenously with 0.50mic/kg of dexmedetomidine diluted with normal saline into 10ml before injection of propofol.
Other Names:
  • Dexmedetomidine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain score after propofol injection
Time Frame: upto 24 hours

After injecting study drugs the pain score after propofol was assessed by using visual rating scale and given score according to severity of pain 0 = no pain,

  1. = mild pain or soreness,
  2. = moderate pain and
  3. = severe pain associated with facial grimacing, arm withdrawal, movement or both.
upto 24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of Pain recall in postoperative recovery room
Time Frame: Upto 24 hrs.

All patient were observed for 2-hrs in recovery room and were asked to recall if there was pain during injection of propofol in the recovery room and incidence of pain was graded as

0-No recall of pain

1-Recall of pain present.

Upto 24 hrs.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Shivakumar M C, MD, KVG Medical College and Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2011

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 30, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 31, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

November 1, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 1, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 31, 2011

Last Verified

October 1, 2011

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe