The Effects of Potassium Nitrate in Reducing Dentinal Hypersensitivity

April 9, 2015 updated by: GlaxoSmithKline

An Exploratory Study Investigating the Effects of a Potassium Nitrate Solution in Reducing Dentinal Hypersensitivity

A randomized, controlled, double blind exploratory study to explore the effects of two different potassium nitrate concentrations and water on exposed dentine in reducing dentinal hypersensitivity. Solutions will be applied for either 2, 5 or 10 minutes and assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS) scores following evaporative (air) stimulus.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

12

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Indiana
      • Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States, 46825
        • University Park Research Center (UPRC)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • General Health and Oral Heath: Good general health and oral health with (in the opinion of the investigator) no clinically significant and relevant abnormalities of medical history.
  • Teeth: Presence of teeth in various locations in the mouth to determine stent success. Required teeth include: at least three first molars; a maxillary incisor, cuspid and bicuspid; and a mandibular incisor, cuspid and bicuspid.
  • Dental Sensitivity: a) Self-reported history of dentinal hypersensitivity lasting more than 6 months and a primary complaint of sensitive teeth. b) A minimum of three accessible teeth that can be isolated that meet all of the following criteria at the screening visit: i. Teeth showing signs of facial/cervical gingival recession and/or signs of erosion or abrasion. Study teeth must exhibit greater than or equal to 3mm recession at the facial surface midpoint. ii. Teeth must be visually stain and calculus free. iii. Teeth having a gingival index score less than or equal to 2. iv. Teeth with a clinical mobility of less than or equal to 1. v. Teeth that show signs of sensitivity, evaporative (air) sensitive teeth displaying a response of greater than or equal to 30 mm on a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS). c) A minimum of three eligible teeth identified at the screening visit that continue to show signs of sensitivity at the baseline assessment at treatment visit 1, evaporative (air) sensitive teeth displaying a response of greater than or equal to 30 mm on a 100 mm VAS.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergy/Intolerance: Known or suspected intolerance or hypersensitivity to the stent materials (or closely related compounds) or any of their stated ingredients.
  • Condition of the Dentition: a) Sensitive teeth not expected to respond to treatment with an over-the-counter (OTC) dentifrice in the opinion of the investigator. b) Teeth with exposed dentine but with deep, defective or facial restorations, teeth used as abutments for fixed or removable partial dentures, teeth with full crowns, orthodontic bands, extensive caries or cracked enamel. Sensitive teeth with contributing aetiologies other than erosion, abrasion or recession of exposed dentine.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Sterile water
Participants to receive 250 microlitres (μL) of sterile water.
Sterile Water
Experimental: Potassium nitrate 5% solution
Participants to receive 250 μL of potassium nitrate 5% solution.
250 μL of Potassium nitrate solution (either 5% or 2.5%)
Experimental: Potassium nitrate 2.5% solution
Participants to receive 250 μL of potassium nitrate 2.5% solution.
250 μL of Potassium nitrate solution (either 5% or 2.5%)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Evaporative Sensitivity Pain Response of Hypersensitive Tooth on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Immediately Post Application of 5% KNO3 Solution, 2.5% KNO3 Solution and Sterile Water
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately post administration of treatment
Response to a constant jet of air applied to a hypersensitive tooth was evaluated using a 100 millimeter (mm) VAS pain response scale. According to this analog scale, pain response for stimulated tooth ranged from 0 (no pain) to 100 (intense pain). Change from baseline in pain response was calculated using VAS score immediately post treatment.
Baseline, immediately post administration of treatment
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Evaporative Sensitivity Pain Response of Hypersensitive Tooth on a VAS, 10 Minutes Post Application of 5% KNO3 Solution, 2.5% KNO3 Solution and Sterile Water
Time Frame: Baseline, 10 minutes post administration of treatment
Response to a constant (duration, pressure, temperature, distance from target) jet of air applied to a hypersensitive tooth was evaluated using a 100 mm VAS pain response scale. According to this analog scale, pain response for stimulated tooth ranged from 0 (no pain) to 100 (intense pain). Change from baseline in pain response was calculated using VAS score at 10 minutes post treatment.
Baseline, 10 minutes post administration of treatment
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Evaporative Sensitivity Pain Response of Hypersensitive Tooth on a VAS, 20 Minute Post Application of 5% KNO3 Solution, 2.5% KNO3 Solution and Sterile Water
Time Frame: Baseline, 20 minutes post administration of treatment
Response to a constant (duration, pressure, temperature, distance from target) jet of air applied to a hypersensitive tooth was evaluated using a 100 mm VAS pain response scale. According to this analog scale, pain response for stimulated tooth ranged from 0 (no pain) to 100 (intense pain). Change from baseline in pain response was calculated using VAS score at 20 minutes post treatment.
Baseline, 20 minutes post administration of treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 17, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

April 30, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 28, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 9, 2015

Last Verified

March 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dental Pain

Clinical Trials on Placebo

3
Subscribe