Post-operative Dental Pain Study Comparing Two Different Dosage of Analgesic Efficacy

April 27, 2015 updated by: GlaxoSmithKline

A Study to Compare the Analgesic Efficacy of Two Different Paracetamol Doses as Measured by Post-operative Pain Relief

GlaxoSmithKline will be conducting this trial to compare analgesic efficacy of paracetamol 1000 mg vs 650 mg. The post-surgical dental pain model will be used to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of paracetamol. Each subject will be enrolled in the study for up to six weeks. The duration of the entire study will be approximately 18 weeks. Each subject will have to come to the clinic for three visits (Screening, Treatment and Follow up visits).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

401

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84124
        • Jean Brown Research

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects aged 18 to 45 years with moderate-to-severe dental pain as assessed by verbal rating scale (VRS) and confirmed by a score of at least 50 mm out of 100 mm using a visual analogue (VAS) following the surgical removal of up to two mandibular third molars. If only one mandibular third molar is removed, it must be a full bony impaction. If two mandibular third molars are removed, both may be partial bony impactions OR there may be a combination of one full bony impaction with the second tooth being erupted, soft tissue impaction, or partial bony impaction. Ipsilateral maxillary third molars may be removed at the surgeon's discretion, regardless of impaction level.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant and lactating females
  • Allergy/intolerance to study materials or nitrous oxide or local anaesthetic used during surgery
  • Current or recurrent liver, kidney or cardiac disease, stomach ulcers, gastrointestinal bleeding, gastroesophageal reflux disease, bronchospasm, rhinitis, urticaria or asthma

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Placebo
Experimental: Paracetamol 1000mg
Paracetamol 1000mg
Experimental: Paracetamol 650 mg
Paracetamol 650 mg

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sum of Pain Relief and Pain Intensity Differences From 0 to 6 Hours (SPRID 6 Hours)
Time Frame: Every two hours from Baseline to 6 hours post dose
SPRID:Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) and Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) at each post-dosing time-point. SPRID score ranged from -5.8 (least pain relief) to 40.3 (highest pain relief). SPID and TOTPAR were calculated as weighted sums of Pain Intensity Differences (PID) and Pain Relief Scores (PRS) at each measurement time, respectively. PID was derived by subtracting the pain severity score at a given post-dosing time-point from the baseline [pain severity score range:0-no pain, 1-mild pain, 2-moderate pain, 3-severe pain using a 4-point categorical Verbal Rating Scale (VRS)]. If the subject rated pain intensity as 2 or 3, pain was assessed using a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) [0 (no pain), 100 (worst pain)]. VAS scores were converted into PID scores by subtracting them from baseline pain scores. PRS was assessed on 5-point categorical pain relief rating scale [0-no relief, 1-little relief, 2-some relief, 3-a lot of relief, 4-complete relief]
Every two hours from Baseline to 6 hours post dose

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
TOTPAR at 4 Hours
Time Frame: Every two hours from baseline to 4 hours post dose

TOTPAR was calculated as sum of products of pain relief (PR) at a given time-point (t) with the time-interval from that time-point to the previous time-point (t-1). The time-intervals used were 0-15, 15-30, 30-45, 45-60, 60-90, 90-120, 120-240. Higher score indicated greater pain relief.

TOTPARt = ∑PR x (timet - timet-1).

PR score was assessed at each of the above time-points based on a 5-point categorical scale [0-no relief, 1-little relief, 2-meaningful relief, 3-a lot of relief, 4-complete relief].

Every two hours from baseline to 4 hours post dose
TOTPAR at 6 Hours
Time Frame: Every two hours from baseline to 6 hours post dose

TOTPAR was calculated as sum of products of pain relief (PR) at a given time-point (t) with the time-interval from that time-point to the previous time-point (t-1). The time-intervals used were 0-15, 15-30, 30-45, 45-60, 60-90, 90-120, 120-240, 240-300 and 300-360. Higher score indicated greater pain relief.

TOTPARt = ∑PR x (timet - timet-1).

PR score was assessed at each of the above time-points based on a 5-point categorical scale [0-no relief, 1-little relief, 2-meaningful relief, 3-a lot of relief, 4-complete relief].

Every two hours from baseline to 6 hours post dose
Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) Scores at 2 Hours
Time Frame: Every two hours from baseline to 2 hours post dose

SPID was calculated as sum of products of Pain Intensity Differences (PID) at a given time-point (t) with the time-interval from that time-point to the previous time-point (t-1). The time-intervals used were 0-15, 15-30, 30-45, 45-60, 60-90, 90-120. Positive and higher scores indicate greater reduction in pain.

SPIDt = ∑PID x (timet - timet-1)

Pain Intensity was assessed at baseline and at each time-point based on a 4-point categorical Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) scale: 0-no pain, 1-mild pain, 2-moderate pain, 3-severe pain.

If the subject rated pain intensity as "2" or "3", pain was assessed using a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) [0 (no pain), 100 (worst pain)]. VAS scores were converted into PID scores by subtracting them from pain scores taken at baseline.

Every two hours from baseline to 2 hours post dose
SPID Scores at 4 Hours
Time Frame: Every two hours from baseline to 4 hours post dose

SPID was calculated as sum of products of Pain Intensity Differences (PID) at a given time-point (t) with the time-interval from that time-point to the previous time-point (t-1). The time-intervals used were 0-15, 15-30, 30-45, 45-60, 60-90, 90-120, 120-240. Positive and higher scores indicate greater reduction in pain.

SPIDt = ∑PID x (timet - timet-1)

Pain Intensity was assessed at baseline and at each time-point based on a 4-point categorical Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) scale: 0-no pain, 1-mild pain, 2-moderate pain, 3-severe pain.

If the subject rated pain intensity as "2" or "3", pain was assessed using a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) [0 (no pain), 100 (worst pain)]. VAS scores were converted into PID scores by subtracting them from pain scores taken at baseline.

Every two hours from baseline to 4 hours post dose
SPID Scores at 6 Hours
Time Frame: Every two hours from baseline to 6 hours post dose

SPID was calculated as sum of products of Pain Intensity Differences (PID) at a given time-point (t) with the time-interval from that time-point to the previous time-point (t-1). The time-intervals used were 0-15, 15-30, 30-45, 45-60, 60-90, 90-120, 120-240, 240-300 and 300-360. Positive and higher scores indicate greater reduction in pain.

SPIDt = ∑PID x (timet - timet-1)

Pain Intensity was assessed at baseline and at each time-point based on a 4-point categorical Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) scale: 0-no pain, 1-mild pain, 2-moderate pain, 3-severe pain.

If the subject rated pain intensity as "2" or "3", pain was assessed using a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) [0 (no pain), 100 (worst pain)]. VAS scores were converted into PID scores by subtracting them from pain scores taken at baseline.

Every two hours from baseline to 6 hours post dose
Participants Global Assessment to Response to Treatment (PGART)
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 hours post dose
PGART was measured by a score in a scale from 0-4: 0- Poor; 1- Fair 2- Good; 3- Very Good; 4- Excellent.
Baseline to 6 hours post dose
Time to Confirmed First Perceptible Relief
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 hours post dose
Participants recorded the time to first perceptible relief by starting the first stopwatch at the time of dosing and stopping it when he/she experienced the first perceptible pain relief. The first perceptible pain relief was confirmed if the participant also stopped the second stopwatch indicating meaningful relief.
Baseline to 6 hours post dose
Time to Onset of Meaningful Pain Relief
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 hours post dose
Participants recorded the time to meaningful relief by stopping a second stopwatch when they first began to experience meaningful relief.
Baseline to 6 hours post dose
Time to Start Using Rescue Medication
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 hours post dose
Median time of use of rescue medication by participants.
Baseline to 6 hours post dose
Percentage of Participants Who Took Rescue Medication at 2 Hours
Time Frame: Baseline to 2 hours post dose
Percentage of participants who received rescue medication at different time points post dose.
Baseline to 2 hours post dose
Percentage of Participants Who Took Rescue Medication at 6 Hours
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 hours post dose
Percentage of participants who received rescue medication at different time points post dose.
Baseline to 6 hours post dose
SPRID at 2 Hours
Time Frame: Every two hours from baseline to 2 hours post dose
SPRID:Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) and Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) at each post-dosing time-point. SPRID score ranged from -1.8 (least pain relief) to 12.3 (highest pain relief). SPID and TOTPAR were calculated as weighted sums of Pain Intensity Differences (PID) and Pain Relief Scores (PRS) at each measurement time, respectively. PID was derived by subtracting the pain severity score at a given post-dosing time-point from the baseline [pain severity score range:0-no pain, 1-mild pain, 2-moderate pain, 3-severe pain using a 4-point categorical Verbal Rating Scale (VRS)]. If the subject rated pain intensity as 2 or 3, pain was assessed using a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) [0 (no pain), 100 (worst pain)]. VAS scores were converted into PID scores by subtracting them from baseline pain scores. PRS was assessed on 5-point categorical pain relief rating scale [0-no relief, 1-little relief, 2-some relief, 3-a lot of relief, 4-complete relief
Every two hours from baseline to 2 hours post dose
SPRID at 4 Hours
Time Frame: Every two hours from baseline to 4 hours post dose
SPRID:Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) and Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) at each post-dosing time-point. SPRID score ranged from -3.8 (least pain relief) to 26.3 (highest pain relief). SPID and TOTPAR were calculated as weighted sums of Pain Intensity Differences (PID) and Pain Relief Scores (PRS) at each measurement time, respectively. PID was derived by subtracting the pain severity score at a given post-dosing time-point from the baseline [pain severity score range:0-no pain, 1-mild pain, 2-moderate pain, 3-severe pain using a 4-point categorical Verbal Rating Scale (VRS)]. If the subject rated pain intensity as 2 or 3, pain was assessed using a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) [0 (no pain), 100 (worst pain)]. VAS scores were converted into PID scores by subtracting them from baseline pain scores. PRS was assessed on 5-point categorical pain relief rating scale [0-no relief, 1-little relief, 2-some relief, 3-a lot of relief, 4-complete relief
Every two hours from baseline to 4 hours post dose
Total Pain Relief Score (TOTPAR) at 2 Hours
Time Frame: Every two hours from baseline to 2 hours post dose

TOTPAR was calculated as sum of products of pain relief (PR) at a given time-point (t) with the time-interval from that time-point to the previous time-point (t-1). The time-intervals used were 0-15, 15-30, 30-45, 45-60, 60-90, 90-120. Higher score indicated greater pain relief.

TOTPARt = ∑PR x (timet - timet-1).

PR score was assessed at each of the above time-points based on a 5-point categorical scale [0-no relief, 1-little relief, 2-meaningful relief, 3-a lot of relief, 4-complete relief].

Every two hours from baseline to 2 hours post dose

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 23, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 23, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

February 25, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 29, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 27, 2015

Last Verified

April 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Post-surgical Dental Pain

Clinical Trials on Placebo

3
Subscribe