A Study to Assess the Efficacy and Tolerability of Diclofenac Potassium Soft Gelatin Capsules Compared With Ibuprofen Tablets in Patients With Moderate to Severe Postoperative Dental Pain

August 22, 2016 updated by: Novartis Pharmaceuticals

A Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Active-controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy and Tolerability of 50 mg Diclofenac Potassium Soft Gelatin Capsules Compared With 400 mg Ibuprofen Tablets in Patients With Moderate to Severe Postoperative Dental Pain

The study is designed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of diclofenac potassium soft gelatin capsules compared with ibuprofen tablets in patients with moderate to severe postoperative dental pain.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

328

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78744
        • Novartis Investigative Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients requiring surgical removal of 2 ipsilateral third molars, of which the mandibular must be fully or partially impacted. The ipsilateral maxillary third molar may be of any impaction level.
  • Patients having a moderate to severe Baseline pain intensity as assessed by a score of 2 (moderate) or 3 (severe) on the 4-point categorical pain intensity VRS, confirmed by a VASPI score of ≥ 50 mm within 5 hours of surgical completion, after local anesthetic dissipation.

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who require the removal of a single third molar, or 2 ipsilateral third molars where mandibular molar is not fully or partially impacted.
  • Patients with active peptic ulcer disease or a history of significant gastrointestinal disease or any gastrointestinal bleeding.
  • Patients with coagulation or bleeding disorders.
  • Patients with a positive drug or alcohol screen.
  • Patients who have received an anti-inflammatory agent, analgesic, sedative, hypnotic, muscle relaxant, or tranquilizer within 5 elimination half-lives before administration of study drug (other than surgical anesthetic prior to and during dental surgery).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Dilcofenac potassium + placebo to Ibuprofen
Single dose of diclofenac potassium 50 mg soft gelatin capsule was given once patient developed moderate to severe pain post the extraction of two ipsilateral third molar teeth. Single dose of placebo to ibuprofen 400 mg tablet was also given to patient in order to maintain double dummy method.
Single dose of diclofenac 50 mg soft gelatin capsule
Other Names:
  • diclofenac-K
Single dose of placebo to ibuprofen 400 mg tablet
Other Names:
  • Placebo
Active Comparator: Ibuprofen + placebo to diclofenac potassium
Single dose of ibuprofen 400 mg tablet was given once patient develops moderate to severe pain post the extraction of two ipsilateral third molar teeth. Single dose of placebo to diclofenac potassium 50 mg soft gelatin capsule was also given to patient in order to maintain double dummy method.
Single dose of ibuprofen 400 mg tablet
Other Names:
  • Ibuprofen acid
Single dose of placebo to diclofenac potassium 50 mg soft gelatin capsule
Other Names:
  • Placebo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Visual Analog Scale of Pain Intensity (VASPI) at 60 Minutes Post Dose
Time Frame: 60 minutes postdose
VASPI reduction from baseline is the difference between the Baseline VASPI score and the VASPI score at a specific observation point. Subjects were asked to identify their current level of pain intensity on the 100 mm VASPI, labeled "no pain" (0 mm) as the left anchor and "worst possible pain" (100 mm) as the right anchor. A positive change represents a reduction in pain.
60 minutes postdose

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Visual Analog Scale of Pain Intensity (VASPI) at Different Time Points
Time Frame: 15, 30, 45, and 90 minutes, and 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 hours post dose
VASPI reduction from baseline is the difference between the Baseline VASPI score and the VASPI score at a specific observation point. Subjects were asked to identify their current level of pain intensity on the 100 mm VASPI, labeled "no pain" (0 mm) as the left anchor and "worst possible pain" (100 mm) as the right anchor. A positive change represents a reduction in pain.
15, 30, 45, and 90 minutes, and 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 hours post dose
Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Visual Analog Scale of Pain Intensity (VASPI) Measuring Change From Baseline at Different Time Points
Time Frame: 15, 30, 45, 60 and 90 minutes, and 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 hours post dose

VASPI reduction from baseline is the difference between the Baseline VASPI score and the VASPI score at a specific observation point. Subjects were asked to identify their pain intensity using the 100 mm VASPI to indicate their current level of pain intensity on the 100 mm VASPI labeled "no pain" (0 mm) as the left anchor and "worst possible pain" (100 mm) as the right anchor. A positive change shows reduction in pain.

AUC of VASPI reduction from baseline for each time point was calculated using the trapezoidal rule.

15, 30, 45, 60 and 90 minutes, and 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 hours post dose
Time to Confirmed First Perceptible Pain Relief
Time Frame: Within 8 hours postdose
Time to onset of first perceptible pain relief (FPR), provided the FPR was subsequently 'confirmed' through the achievement of meaningful pain relief (MPR). Participant started two stopwatches at dosing, and recorded FPR by stopping the first stopwatch when he/she first experienced 'any' pain relief. FPR is 'confirmed' only if the participant also stopped the second stopwatch indicating 'meaningful pain relief'.
Within 8 hours postdose
Time to Onset of Meaningful Pain Relief (MPR)
Time Frame: Within 8 hours postdose
Using the double stopwatch technique, participant started two stopwatches at dosing, and stopped the second stopwatch as soon as he/she began to experience 'meaningful' relief from pain. Time elapsed is recorded as the MPR.
Within 8 hours postdose
Time to Onset of First Perceptible Pain Relief (FPR)
Time Frame: Within 8 hours postdose
Using the double stopwatch technique, participant started two stopwatches at dosing, and stopped the first stopwatch as soon as he/she first began to feel 'any' relief from pain. The time elapsed was recorded as the FPR.
Within 8 hours postdose
Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID)
Time Frame: 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours postdose
At baseline and at each defined study time point, the clinical site staff captured pain intensity information from each subject using the 4-point categorical VRS. The subject was asked "What is your pain level at this time?" and the response was recorded as 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe. Pain intensity difference (PID) was the difference between the baseline pain intensity score and the pain intensity score at a specific observation point. SPID is the weighted sum of PIDs from the 15-minute to the 8-hour observation point (SPID8). Additionally, SPID evaluations were also be done at 1 (SPID1), 2 (SPID2), 4 (SPID4) and 6 (SPID6) hours post dose. The weights used for these values were 0.25 for the 15-, 30-, 45-, and 60-minute observations, and 0.5 for the 90-minute, 2- and 4-hour observations, and 1 for the remaining observations.
1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours postdose
Summed Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) at Different Time Points
Time Frame: 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours postdose

After the administration of the single dose of the assigned study treatment, at the defined study time points, the clinical site staff captured pain relief information from each subject.

The subject was asked "What is the amount of pain relief as compared to the starting pain?" and the response was recorded as 0 = none, 1 = a little, 2 = some, 3 = a lot, or 4 = complete.

Total pain relief (TOTPAR) was the weighted sum of the pain relief scores from the 15-minute to the 8-hour observation points (TOTPAR8). Additionally, TOTPARs at 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours were calculated. The weights used for these values (evaluation time points) were 0.25 for the 15-, 30-, 45-, and 60-minute observations, 0.5 for the 90-minute, 2- and 4-hour observations, and 1 for the remaining observations.

1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours postdose
Peak Analgesic Effect
Time Frame: From dose administration to 8 hours post dose
Peak analgesic relief is represented through highest pain intensity difference (PID), highest VASPI reduction, and highest pain relief scores. Pain intensity was measured on a verbal rating scale (VRS) ranging from 0 to 3 (none to severe, with higher score for higher pain intensity). PID represents difference in this score at baseline and specific time points, larger change indicating larger reduction in pain, with highest PID representing the largest difference. Pain relief was recorded on a scale ranging from 0 to 4 (none to complete, with higher score for higher pain relief), with highest pain relief representing maximum relief obtained. Pain intensity was also measured through a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VASPI), ranging from "no pain" (0 mm) to "worst possible pain" (100 mm). A positive change in VASPI indicates reduction in pain, with highest VASPI reduction representing highest change.
From dose administration to 8 hours post dose
Duration of Analgesia
Time Frame: From dose administration to 8 hours post dose
Duration of analgesia (time to first use of rescue medication) was evaluated, from dose administration to the time of first use of rescue medication within the 8-hour treatment period. Censored observations were included in calculating this endpoint. Censored subjects include any subject who did not take rescue medication prior to the end of the assessment period of 480 minutes (8 hours).
From dose administration to 8 hours post dose
Number of Patients Needing Rescue Medication
Time Frame: From dose administration to 8 hours post dose
The number of patients needing rescue medication within the 8 hour treatment period was evaluated.
From dose administration to 8 hours post dose
Number of Patients With Different Responses Based on Patient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment (PGART)
Time Frame: At 8 hour postdose prior to use of rescue medication
PGART was measured by asking patients to give a score on a scale from 0 to 4, where 0 = poor; 1 = fair; 2 = good; 3 = very good; 4 = excellent. This measurement was taken at the end of 8 hours, or before the use of rescue medication (for a patient who takes rescue medciation within the 8 hour period).
At 8 hour postdose prior to use of rescue medication
Number of Patients With Any Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and Death
Time Frame: time of dosage administration up to the follow-up phone call on study Day 3 (maximum 3 days)
Treatment emergent adverse events are reported in the below data table.
time of dosage administration up to the follow-up phone call on study Day 3 (maximum 3 days)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 18, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 16, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

June 19, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 17, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 22, 2016

Last Verified

August 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Post Operative Dental Pain

Clinical Trials on Diclofenac potassium

3
Subscribe