Effects of Zortress® + Tacrolimus vs. Standard Immunosuppression on Progression of Coronary Artery Calcifications and Bone Disease in de Novo Renal Transplant Recipients

August 4, 2017 updated by: Hartmut Malluche, MD, University of Kentucky

Primary objectives: A. To evaluate the effect of Zortress® versus standard immunosuppression therapy on progression of CAC as evidenced by changes in Agatston scores from baseline and at 6, and 12 months in renal transplantation patients. B. To investigate progression of CAC in patients undergoing renal transplantation within the study period.

Secondary objectives:

  1. To evaluate in renal transplantation the effect of Zortress® versus standard immunosuppression therapy on bone mass as evidenced by changes in quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
  2. To evaluate in renal transplantation the effect of Zortress® versus standard immunosuppression therapy on activity of bone forming and resorbing cells as evidenced by changes in bone histology.
  3. To evaluate in renal transplantation the effect of Zortress® versus standard immunosuppression therapy on biochemical parameters of bone turnover as evidenced by changes in serum Parathyroid Hormone (PTH), Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP), Tartrate-Resistant Acid Phosphatase (TRAP), Sclerostin, Receptor Activator of Nuclear factor Kappa B Ligand (RANKL), Osteoprotegerin (OPG), , serum CTX (C-terminal telopeptide of type 1 collagen), and urinary NTX (N-terminal cross link telopeptide).
  4. To evaluate in renal transplantation the effect of Zortress® versus standard immunosuppression therapy on cardiovascular events, graft rejection and patient survival.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Kentucky
      • Lexington, Kentucky, United States, 40536
        • University of Kentucky

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • De novo renal transplant recipients (from deceased or living donors) between 18-70 years of age
  • Willingness to participate in the study and comply with study requirements as evidenced by signed IRB-approved informed consent

Enrollment Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous solid organ transplant
  • Known hypersensitivity to any of the study drugs, or their class, or to any of their excipients
  • Recipients of an investigational drug within 30 days before transplant
  • Any abnormal physical or laboratory findings of clinical significance which would interfere with conduct of the study
  • Females of childbearing potential who are planning to become pregnant, who are pregnant and/or lactating, or unwilling to use medically approved means of contraception

Randomization Exclusion Criteria:

  • Platelet count <75,000/mm
  • White blood cell count of < 2,000/mm³
  • Hypercholesterolemia (>400 mg/dL) or hypertriglyceridemia (>500 mg/dL) despite lipid-lowering therapy
  • Presence of any clinically significant infection requiring IV antibiotics
  • Positive serum HCG (women of childbearing potential)
  • Spot urine protein to creatinine ratio (UPr/Cr ) ≥ 0.5
  • Any biopsy-confirmed acute rejection since transplant
  • Baseline CAC score < 100 at baseline reading

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard Immunosuppression
Tacrolimus + Myfortic®/Cellcept + Corticosteroids

Standard immunosuppression: THY 1-1.5 mg/kg/d qd for a total of 6 mg/kg •TAC trough targets 0-3 mo 8-12 ng/ml 4-6 mo 6-10 ng/ml >6 mo 5-8 ng/ml•Myfortic® or CEL 360mg or 500mg po BID, and receiving THY then Myfortic® or CEL 720 mg or 1000mg PO BID once THY induction completed• COR 500mg MET IV pre-op,125mg MET IV q24h x 2 doses (Post-Op Days 1 &2) 20mg Pred PO daily x 2 wks 15mg Pred PO daily x 2 wks 10mg Pred PO daily x 4 wks 5mg Pred PO daily x 4 wks 5 mg Pred PO every other day through mon 12.

Experimental: TAC + Zortress® + COR In this arm patients will stop Myfortic®/CEL and start Zortress® at a dose of 1 mg PO BID with a target level of 3-8 ng/ml.At Zortress® level of at least 3 ng/ml TAC will be dosed to a target range as follows Randomization through mo 3 post-transplant 7-10 ng/ml 4-6 mo post transplant 5-8 ng/ml >6 mo post transplant 4-7 ng/ml.

Experimental: Zortress®
Tacrolimus + Zortress® + Corticosteroids

Standard immunosuppression: THY 1-1.5 mg/kg/d qd for a total of 6 mg/kg •TAC trough targets 0-3 mo 8-12 ng/ml 4-6 mo 6-10 ng/ml >6 mo 5-8 ng/ml•Myfortic® or CEL 360mg or 500mg po BID, and receiving THY then Myfortic® or CEL 720 mg or 1000mg PO BID once THY induction completed• COR 500mg MET IV pre-op,125mg MET IV q24h x 2 doses (Post-Op Days 1 &2) 20mg Pred PO daily x 2 wks 15mg Pred PO daily x 2 wks 10mg Pred PO daily x 4 wks 5mg Pred PO daily x 4 wks 5 mg Pred PO every other day through mon 12.

Experimental: TAC + Zortress® + COR In this arm patients will stop Myfortic®/CEL and start Zortress® at a dose of 1 mg PO BID with a target level of 3-8 ng/ml.At Zortress® level of at least 3 ng/ml TAC will be dosed to a target range as follows Randomization through mo 3 post-transplant 7-10 ng/ml 4-6 mo post transplant 5-8 ng/ml >6 mo post transplant 4-7 ng/ml.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
progression of Coronary Artery Calcification
Time Frame: 1 year
The primary outcome of this study is the proportion of pts in the treatment group who experience a 1yr increase of ≥2.5 for the square-root transformed volume indicating CAC progression. Student's Fisher's Exact T-tests will be used to determine progression of CAC score between control & treatment groups. Secondary objectives 1-3 examine 1yr changes in several measurement outcome variables. Fisher's exact tests & confidence intervals for the difference in proportions will be used to compare the two groups in terms of cardiovascular events, graft rejection, & pt survival.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 30, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

June 5, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 7, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 4, 2017

Last Verified

August 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Renal Transplant

Clinical Trials on Zortress® /Everolimus

3
Subscribe