- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01621464
Closed Loop Stimulation for Neuromediated Syncope (SPAIN Study) (SPAIN)
April 11, 2014 updated by: Gonzalo Barón-Esquivias, MD, PhD, FESC, Spanish Society of Cardiology
Closed Loop Stimulation for Neuromediated Syncope
Physiological stimulation therapy effectiveness will be proved with contractility sensor or CLS sensor (Closed Loop Stimulation), in BIOTRONIK CLS pacemakers to prevent from neuromediated syncope.
Furthermore, not only will be investigated if this system eradicates syncopes, but also if the number of presyncopal episodes is reduced.
Study Overview
Status
Unknown
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
55
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Sevilla, Spain, 41013
- Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
36 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients that fulfill the requirements of the study:
- Patients with 5 previous neuromediated syncopes
- Positive Tilt test, Cardioinhibitory response, heart rate < 40 bpm for at least 10'' or pauses > 3''
- Patient ≥ 40 years
- No cardiopathy present
Patients without the following contraindications:
- Drug treatment with β-blockers
- Chronic Polyneuropathy
- All contraindications for DDD or DDDR pacing (as per clinical guidelines SEC, 2002)
- Geographically stable patients and able to attend all follow ups
- Patients that have signed the informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients that do NOT fulfill the inclusion criteria mentioned above
- Patients with the contraindications indicated above
- Patients with syncopes due to Carotid Sinus Hypersensitivity
- Other syncope causes different to the CNS
- Patients involved in other clinical studies
- Pregnant women or in age bearing that are not using at least 2 contraception methods
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Placebo Comparator: Control
Pacemaker implanted but NO pacing (mode DDI, 30 bpm and sub-threshold)
|
Crossover: 1 year at control group and 1 year at CLS group (randomized which group goes first)
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: CLS group
pacemaker implanted programmed with the contractility sensor activated (mode DDD-CLS)
|
Crossover: 1 year at control group and 1 year at CLS group (randomized which group goes first)
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Reduction of number of syncopes
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Demonstrate that pacing therapy regulated by an inotropic sensor (CLS) is effective for the suppression of the neuromediated syncope
|
1 year
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Time reduction to the first syncope
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Time reduction to 1st syncope: Time from the implantation to the 1st recurrence of the syncope.
|
1 year
|
|
Reduction of the recurrence of presyncopal symptoms
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Reduction of the recurrence of presyncopal symptoms: Since the CLS sensor can detect any changes in contractility, and presyncopal symptoms are preceded by a contractility increase, it is thought that CLS group patients will suffer less from these symptoms.
|
1 year
|
|
Improvement of Quality of Life
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Improvement of Quality of Life: Syncope produces uncertainties and fear to the patients.
This will be checked if pacemaker implant improves QOL of these patients and if a specific programming scheme influences the outcome.
|
1 year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Gonzalo Barón Esquivias, MD PhD FESC, Spanish Society of Cardiology
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Baron-Esquivias G, Moya-Mitjans A, Martinez-Alday J, Ruiz-Granell R, Lacunza-Ruiz J, Garcia-Civera R, Gutierrez-Carretero E, Romero-Garrido R, Morillo CA. Impact of dual-chamber pacing with closed loop stimulation on quality of life in patients with recurrent reflex vasovagal syncope: results of the SPAIN study. Europace. 2020 Feb 1;22(2):314-319. doi: 10.1093/europace/euz294.
- Baron-Esquivias G, Morillo CA, Moya-Mitjans A, Martinez-Alday J, Ruiz-Granell R, Lacunza-Ruiz J, Garcia-Civera R, Gutierrez-Carretero E, Romero-Garrido R. Dual-Chamber Pacing With Closed Loop Stimulation in Recurrent Reflex Vasovagal Syncope: The SPAIN Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Oct 3;70(14):1720-1728. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.08.026.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
May 1, 2006
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
January 1, 2016
Study Completion (Anticipated)
January 1, 2016
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
June 11, 2012
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 15, 2012
First Posted (Estimate)
June 18, 2012
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
April 14, 2014
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 11, 2014
Last Verified
April 1, 2014
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- SPAIN
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.