Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Three Different Techniques for Open Hernia Repair

October 3, 2012 updated by: Anders Thorell, Karolinska Institutet

Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Three Different Techniques for Open

The primary aim is to evaluate if PSH and/or ultrapro mesch reduces chronic groin pain postoperatively compared to lichtenstein mesh. The second aim is to evaluate quality of life, recovery from surgery and frequency of recurrencies in the three groups

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

160

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Stockholm, Sweden, 116 91
        • Ersta Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18-75 years
  • unilateral primary hernia
  • open surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Recurrent Hernia
  • Bilateral Hernia
  • laparoscopic surgery
  • Female

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Lichtenstein
Hernia repair with lichtenstein propylene mesh
Hernia repair admodum Lichtenstein with polypropylene mesh
Hernia repair with Ultra Pro Hernia System (UHS)
Hernia repair with Prolene Hernia System(PHS)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
postoperatively pain
Time Frame: Postoperative 36 month
Visual analog scale (VAS)
Postoperative 36 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of life
Time Frame: 36 month postoperative
SF36
36 month postoperative
frequency of recurrencies
Time Frame: postopertive 36 month
check patients journal
postopertive 36 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 1, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 3, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

October 4, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 4, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 3, 2012

Last Verified

September 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2006/672-31/4

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Inguinal Hernia

Clinical Trials on Hernia repair

3
Subscribe