- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03007758
Open Versus Robotic Retromuscular Ventral Hernia Repair (ORREO)
August 5, 2025 updated by: Prisma Health-Upstate
Prospective Randomized Control Trial of Open Versus Robotic REtrOmuscular Ventral Hernia Repair (ORREO Trial)
The purpose of this study is to determine how the robotic retromuscular hernia repair compares to the open retromuscular hernia repair for large hernia defects in patients at higher risk of wound complications.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
All patients presenting to the Greenville Health System Hernia Center who meet the inclusion criteria will be considered for enrollment.
Patients who qualify and agree to participate will be randomized 1:1 to robotic retromuscular ventral hernia repair or open retromuscular ventral hernia repair.
Data to be collected includes the following: demographic information, medical characteristics, medications, medical and surgical history, operative details, hospital stay data, and patient-reported outcomes via a quality of life questionnaire.
Post-operative follow-up will occur at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
101
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Ventral or incisional hernia measuring ≥ 7 cm and ≤ 15 cm.
- At least one of the following risk factors: Body Mass Index > 30, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, current smoker (within 1 month)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Current abdominal wall infection
- Presence of ileostomy, colostomy, or ileal conduit
- Center for Disease Control wound class 3 or 4
- Hernia defect < 7 cm or >15 cm
- Pregnant women
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: robotic ventral hernia repair (VHR)
Robotic VHR
|
A robotic retromuscular ventral hernia repair involves a similar separation of the layers of the abdominal wall, similar mesh placement, and similar closure of the hernia defect.
The surgical robot is a tool that allows your surgeon to place long, narrow instruments through small incisions in order to perform surgery from the inside of your abdomen.
Rather than one longer incision in the middle of your abdomen, four to six small incisions, about 1 inch, are made along the outer part of your abdomen between the rib cage and hip.
|
|
Active Comparator: open ventral hernia repair (VHR)
Open VHR
|
An open retromuscular ventral hernia repair involves an incision through your abdominal wall, most often through a prior surgery scar.
The contents of the hernia, which may include intestine or fatty tissue, are returned into the abdominal cavity.
The posterior (inner-most) layer of the abdominal wall is separated from the muscle and closed, which closes the abdominal cavity.
Mesh is then placed over that closed layer, which is outside of the abdominal cavity, but below the abdominal muscles.
The anterior (outer-most) layer of the abdominal wall is then closed over the mesh, which closes the hernia.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Composite Outcome of Diagnosis of Surgical Site Occurrence or Infection, Hospital Readmission, or Hernia Recurrence
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
A composite outcome of events which are clinically significant including but not limited to seroma requiring procedural intervention, skin dehiscence, cellulitis, hematoma, skin necrosis, and surgical site infections which may require interventions such as wound care or antibiotic therapy.
|
Through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
All Surgical Site Occurrences
Time Frame: Post-operatively: 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years
|
Surgical site occurrence (SSO) is defined as all wound complications that occur after a surgical procedure but are not surgical site infections.
|
Post-operatively: 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years
|
|
Surgical Site Occurrences Requiring Procedural Intervention
Time Frame: Post-operatively: 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years
|
Surgical site occurrence (SSO) is defined as all wound complications that occur after a surgical procedure but are not surgical site infections
|
Post-operatively: 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years
|
|
All Surgical Site Infections
Time Frame: Post-operatively: 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years
|
Surgical site occurrence is defined as all wound complications that occur after a surgical procedure but are not surgical site infections.
|
Post-operatively: 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years
|
|
Surgical Site Infections Requiring Procedural Intervention
Time Frame: Post-operatively: 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years
|
Post-operatively: 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years
|
|
|
Length of Stay at Hospital Measured in Days
Time Frame: Time from procedure until discharge, an expected range of 2 to10 days
|
Time from procedure until discharge, an expected range of 2 to10 days
|
|
|
Operative Time (Procedure Start to Procedure Finish Measured in Minutes)
Time Frame: Day of surgery
|
Day of surgery
|
|
|
Cost for Hospital Charges From Billing Office
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
Through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
|
|
BMI
Time Frame: Measured at study enrollment
|
Body Mass Index
|
Measured at study enrollment
|
|
Hernia Width
Time Frame: measured at surgery
|
Width of Hernia
|
measured at surgery
|
|
Hernia Length
Time Frame: measured at surgery
|
Length of Hernia
|
measured at surgery
|
|
Quality of Life Via Questionnaire - 30 Days
Time Frame: assessed at Baseline and Post-operatively at 30 days
|
Patient reported outcomes via the Hernia related quality of life score.
The survey contains 12 statements about the patients abdominal wall and asks the patient to rate how strongly the disagree (1) or agree (6) with the statements on a scale 1-6.
The score is calculated with the following formula: (120-[(20/12)*(sum of response on all 12 questions)]).The highest possible number, meaning the abdominal wall does not affect the patient, is 100, and the lowest, meaning the abdominal wall greatly affects the patient's quality of life, is a 0.
|
assessed at Baseline and Post-operatively at 30 days
|
|
Quality of Life Via Questionnaire - 6 Through 12 Months
Time Frame: assessed at Baseline and Post-operatively at 6 through 12 months. Data for the 6 and 12-month patient reported outcomes were combined for analysis.
|
Patient reported outcomes via the Hernia related quality of life score.
The survey contains 12 statements about the patients abdominal wall and asks the patient to rate how strongly the disagree (1) or agree (6) with the statements on a scale 1-6.The score is calculated with the following formula: (120-[(20/12)*(sum of response on all 12 questions)]).The highest possible number, meaning the abdominal wall does not affect the patient, is 100, and the lowest, meaning the abdominal wall greatly affects the patient's quality of life, is a 0.
|
assessed at Baseline and Post-operatively at 6 through 12 months. Data for the 6 and 12-month patient reported outcomes were combined for analysis.
|
|
Quality of Life Via Questionnaire - 24 Months
Time Frame: assessed at Baseline and Post-operatively at 24 months
|
Patient reported outcomes via the Hernia related quality of life score.
The survey contains 12 statements about the patients abdominal wall and asks the patient to rate how strongly the disagree (1) or agree (6) with the statements on a scale 1-6.
The score is calculated with the following formula: (120-[(20/12)*(sum of responses on all 12 questions)]).The highest possible number, meaning the abdominal wall does not affect the patient, is 100, and the lowest, meaning the abdominal wall greatly affects the patient's quality of life, is a 0.
|
assessed at Baseline and Post-operatively at 24 months
|
|
Pain Score - 30 Day Patient Reported Outcomes
Time Frame: assessed at Baseline and Post-operatively at 30 days.
|
Patient is asked 3 different questions all in relation to their pain in the past 7 days: how intense was it as its worst, on average, and right now.
They then rank their pain for each question on a scale of 1 - 5. 1 meaning no pain and 5 very severe pain.
The pain scores were then averaged and used for this analysis.
|
assessed at Baseline and Post-operatively at 30 days.
|
|
Pain Score - 6 or 12 Month Patient Reported Outcomes
Time Frame: assessed at Baseline and Post-operatively at 6-12 months; data for 6 and 12-month pain scores were combined for analysis.
|
Patient is asked 3 different questions all in relation to their pain in the past 7 days: how intense was it as its worst, on average, and right now.
They then rank their pain for each question on a scale of 1 - 5. 1 meaning no pain and 5 very severe pain.
The pain scores were then averaged and used for this analysis.
|
assessed at Baseline and Post-operatively at 6-12 months; data for 6 and 12-month pain scores were combined for analysis.
|
|
Pain Score - 24 Month Patient Reported Outcomes
Time Frame: assessed at Baseline and Post-operatively at 24 months
|
Patient is asked 3 different questions all in relation to their pain in the past 7 days: how intense was it as its worst, on average, and right now.
They then rank their pain for each question on a scale of 1 - 5. 1 meaning no pain and 5 very severe pain.
The pain scores were then averaged and used for this analysis.
|
assessed at Baseline and Post-operatively at 24 months
|
|
Ventral Hernia Recurrence Inventory 1 Year
Time Frame: assessed at Baseline and Post-operatively at 12 months.
|
Patients are asked 3 yes or no questions about their hernia operation: do you feel your hernia has come back, do you feel or see a bulge, and do you have physical pain or symptoms at the site.
|
assessed at Baseline and Post-operatively at 12 months.
|
|
Ventral Hernia Recurrence Inventory 2 Years
Time Frame: assessed at Baseline and Post-operatively at 24 months
|
Patients are asked 3 yes or no questions about their hernia operation: do you feel your hernia has come back, do you feel or see a bulge, and do you have physical pain or symptoms at the site.
|
assessed at Baseline and Post-operatively at 24 months
|
|
Hernia Recurrence
Time Frame: assessed Post-operatively as 24 months
|
The ventral hernia recurrence inventory asked patients if they have had any additional surgery since the hernia operation.
If they answer yes, they choose if the surgery was for a hernia or another reason.
The answers from 1 year follow up and 2 year follow up to the last question were combined for this analysis.
Composite recurrence was then determined by excluding patients with negative CT scan or physical exam but had answered the ventral hernia recurrence inventory indication the hernia recurrence.
|
assessed Post-operatively as 24 months
|
|
Conversion to Open
Time Frame: Assessed at index surgery.
|
Robotic surgeries converted to open surgeries.
|
Assessed at index surgery.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jeremy A Warren, MD, Prisma Health-Upstate
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
December 1, 2016
Primary Completion (Actual)
November 26, 2024
Study Completion (Actual)
November 26, 2024
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
December 15, 2016
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 28, 2016
First Posted (Estimated)
January 2, 2017
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
August 7, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 5, 2025
Last Verified
August 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Pro00062464
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
IPD Plan Description
All patients will be entered prospectively into the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative (AHSQC) database.
Drug and device information, study documents
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Ventral Hernia
-
Varazdin General HospitalCompletedIncisional Ventral Hernia | Recurrent Ventral HerniaCroatia
-
Anne Arundel Health System Research InstituteMedtronic - MITGCompletedGrade I Ventral Hernia | Grade II Ventral HerniaUnited States
-
University Hospital, Strasbourg, FranceRecruitingVentral Hernia RepairFrance
-
Makassed General HospitalSuspended
-
Sofregen Medical, Inc.TerminatedVentral Hernia RepairUnited States
-
GSVM Medical CollegeCompleted
-
Zaza DemetrashviliRecruitingLarge Midline Ventral HerniaGeorgia
-
Hvidovre University HospitalUniversity of CopenhagenCompleted
-
Hvidovre University HospitalCopenhagen University Hospital at HerlevCompleted
-
Distalmotion SAConfinisCompletedVentral Hernia RepairSwitzerland, Austria, France, Germany
Clinical Trials on robotic ventral hernia repair
-
Momentis SurgicalRecruiting
-
University of Geneva, SwitzerlandActive, not recruiting
-
The Cleveland ClinicIntuitive SurgicalCompleted
-
Intuitive SurgicalCompletedVentral HerniaUnited States
-
Intuitive SurgicalTerminatedVentral HerniaUnited States
-
University Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandSt. Clara Hospital, Basel, Switzerland; Klinikum Kempten, Kempten, GermanyNot yet recruitingVentral Hernia | Abdominal Wall Defect | Incisional Hernia
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesTerminated
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Ahmed Kahlawy Mahrous MohamedNot yet recruiting