Rives Technique Versus Lichtenstein Repair for Primary Inguinal Hernia

March 28, 2018 updated by: José Jacob Motos Micó, Hospital Siberia-Serena

Randomized Clinical Trial of Rives Technique Versus Lichtenstein Repair for Primary Inguinal Hernia

Lichtenstein technique, inserting a mesh over the inguinal cord in the neurological plane, is considered the standard of inguinal hernia repair, but it has 4% recurrence and 12% chronic postoperative pain. Rives technique inserts the mesh in the preperitoneal space behind the neurological plane and the muscular plane, thus better fulfilling the principle of hydrostatics.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Detailed Description

These techniques have not been compared randomly for assessment of chronic pain, postoperative complications and recurrences

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

600

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Badajoz
      • Talarrubias, Badajoz, Spain, 06640
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Siberia Serena
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Enrique Javier Grau Talens, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 93 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Men or women aged between 18 and 93 years (inclusive) at the time of the first screening visit.

They must provide signed written informed consent and agree to comply the study protocol

Exclusion Criteria:

Refusal to give informed consent. Refusal to participate giant inguinal hernias

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
OTHER: Rives technique
Rives technique for primary inguinal hernia
Repair for primary inguinal hernia
OTHER: Lichtenstein repair
Lichtenstein repair for primary inguinal hernia
Repair for primary inguinal hernia

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate postoperative complications of pain
Time Frame: 7 days
The patients are clinically reviewed in the office within 7 days of discharge (pain is evaluated at rest and with movement (standing up, sitting down, and walking), using a VAS (visual analogue scale). Using a ruler, the score is determined by measuring the distance (mm) on the 10-cm line between the "no pain" anchor and the patient's mark, providing a range of scores from 0-100. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity. Based on the distribution of pain VAS scores in post- surgical patients, the following cut points on the pain VAS have been recommended: no pain (0-4 mm), mild pain(5-44 mm), moderate pain (45-74 mm), and severe pain (75-100 mm)
7 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate the chronic pain
Time Frame: 1 year
The patients are reviewed clinically by the service's surgeons again after a year. If pain is found, this is evaluated as being with movement, spontaneous, episodic, or constant in nature, and measured with a VAS. The patients are clinically reviewed in the office: pain is evaluated at rest and with movement (standing up, sitting down, and walking), using a VAS (visual analogue scale). Using a ruler, the score is determined by measuring the distance (mm) on the 10-cm line between the "no pain" anchor and the patient's mark, providing a range of scores from 0-100. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity. Based on the distribution of pain VAS scores in post- surgical patients, the following cut points on the pain VAS have been recommended: no pain (0-4 mm), mild pain(5-44 mm), moderate pain (45-74 mm), and severe pain (75-100 mm)
1 year
Evaluate the recurrences
Time Frame: 1 year
The patients are reviewed clinically by the service's surgeons again after a year. The inguinal region is examined. A mass, reducible or otherwise, is regarded as a recurrence.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2015

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

November 1, 2018

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

November 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 22, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 28, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

April 5, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

April 5, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 28, 2018

Last Verified

March 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HSiberia-Serena

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Primary Inguinal Hernia

Clinical Trials on Repair for primary inguinal hernia

Subscribe