Clinical Trial of Safety and Efficacy of Afalaza in Patients With Symptoms of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Risk of Progression

November 1, 2018 updated by: Materia Medica Holding

Multicentric Double-blind Placebo-controlled Randomized Parallel-group Clinical Trial of Safety and Efficacy of Afalaza in Patients With Symptoms of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Risk of Progression

The purpose of this study is:

  • To assess safety of Afalaza drug within 12 months in patients with symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and risk of progression.
  • To assess efficacy of Afalaza drug within 12 months in patients with symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia and risk of progression.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

260

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 109472
        • The State Budget Health Care institution of Moscow the City "Hospital for veterans of wars No. 2 of the Administration of Health Care of Moscow City"
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 115419
        • The State Budget Health Care institution of Moscow the City "Specialized clinical (neuro-psychiatric) hospital No. 8 n.a. Z.P. Solovyov - ''Clinic of neuroses" of the Administration of Health Care of Moscow City
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 117198
        • The Federal State Budget Educational institution of High Professional Training "Peoples' Friendship University of Russia", Department of Urology and Operative Nephrology
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 119991
        • The State Budget Educational institution of High Professional Training I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of Ministry of Health Care and Social Development of the Russian Federation, Department of Urology
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 127473
        • The State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Professional Education " Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry of A. I. Evdokimov" Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 129090
        • The Federal State Budget institution "Polyclinic № 3" of Affairs Management Department of the President of the Russian Federation
      • Moscow region Koroljov, Russian Federation, 141060
        • Limited Liability Company "Family policlinic no. 4"
      • Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation, 344011
        • Municipal Treatment-and-Prophylactic Health Care institution Clinical Diagnostic Centre "Zdorovie"
      • St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, 191036
        • The Federal State Budgetary Institution " Saint-Petersburg Research Institute Phthisiopulmonology " Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
      • St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, 194044
        • The Federal State institution "All-Russian center of emergency and radiation medicine n.a. A.M. Nikiforov" of the Ministry of the Russian Federation for Affairs of civil defence, emergencies and elimination of consequences of natural disasters
      • St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, 194291
        • The Federal State Budgetary Health Care Institution "Clinical Hospital №122 n. a. L. G. Sokolov of the Federal Biomedical Agency"
      • St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, 196066
        • Limited liability company "Medical unit No. 157"
      • St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, 199106
        • Saint-Petersburg State Budget Health Care institution "Pokrovsky city hospital"
      • St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, 199178
        • Limited Liability Company "Hospital OrCli"
      • Tomsk, Russian Federation, 634050
        • The State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Professional Education " Siberian state Medical University" Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
      • Kyiv, Ukraine, 04053
        • The State Institution "Institute of Urology of the Ukraine National Academy of Medical Sciences"

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

45 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male patients 45 to 60 y.o. inclusive with a documented diagnosis of Benign prostatic hyperplasia.
  2. Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) having been experienced for 3 months and longer.
  3. Total IPSS score (International Prostate Symptome Score) of 8 to 15.
  4. Prostate volume of more than 30 cm3.
  5. Maximal urinary flow rate of 10-15 mL/sec.
  6. Micturition volume of 125-350 mL.
  7. Residual volume of less than 100 mL.
  8. Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of less than 4 ng/mL.
  9. Use of and compliance with contraceptive methods during the trial and for 30 days upon completion of participation in the trial.
  10. Presence of the patient's information sheet (informed consent form) for participation in the clinical trial.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Invasive therapies for BPH including a transurethral prostatic resection, thermotherapy, microwave therapy, transurethral needle ablation, stenting, etc.
  2. Malignant oncological disease of the urogenital system as well as malignancies of any other localization during last 5 years.
  3. Acute urinary retention (AUR) within 3 months before inclusion in the trial.
  4. Neurogenic dysfunctions and bladder ears.
  5. Urinary stone disease.
  6. Urethral stricture, bladder neck sclerosis.
  7. History of operative aids for pelvic organs.
  8. Urogenital infections in the phase of active inflammation.
  9. Systematic administration of agents exhibiting effects on bladder function and urine production.
  10. Exacerbation or decompensation of chronic diseases affecting the possibility of patients to participate in the clinical trial, including severe concurrent cardiovascular conditions and disorders of the nervous system, renal and hepatic insufficiency.
  11. History of administration of testosterone 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors (finasteride, dutasteride).
  12. History of polyvalent allergy.
  13. Allergy/intolerance to any component of drug agents used in the therapy.
  14. Malabsorption syndrome, including congenital or acquired lactase or other disaccharidase deficiency.
  15. Administration of drugs specified as "Prohibited concomitant therapy", within 3 months before enrollment.
  16. Exacerbation or decompensation of chronic diseases affecting the possibility of patients to participate in the clinical trial.
  17. Drug and alcohol consumption (over 2 alc. units daily), mental diseases. Legal incapacity or limited legal capacity.
  18. Legal incapacitation or limited legal capacity.
  19. Patients, who, in the investigator's opinion, will fail to observe the requirements during the trial or adhere to the studied drug administration procedure.
  20. Participation in other clinical trials within 3 months before enrolment in this trial.
  21. Presence of other factors, complicating the patient's participation in the trial (e.g., planned lengthy business and other trips).
  22. A patient is a part of the center's research staff, taking a direct part in the trial, or an immediate family member of the investigator. Immediate family members are defined as spouses, parents, children or siblings, regardless of whether full blood or adopted.
  23. The patient is employed with Scientific Production Firm Materia Medica Holding LLC, i.e. is the company's employee, part-time employee under contract, or appointed official in charge of the trial, or their immediate family.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Afalaza (2 tablets twice a day)
Safety and Efficacy
Placebo Comparator: Placebo (2 tablets twice a day)
Safety and Efficacy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Total IPSS Scores (International Prostate Symptome Score) After 1, 3, 6 and 12 Months Compared to Baseline.
Time Frame: Baseline, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months
The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) is based on the answers to 7 questions concerning urinary symptoms plus one question concerning quality of life (QoL). Each of the seven symptoms includes the assignment of scores from 0 to 5. The total score can therefore range from 0 to 35 points (asymptomatic to very symptomatic). The patient's quality of life (QoL) was evaluated separately in this clinical study.
Baseline, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Dynamics of Irritative Symptoms Evaluated by IPSS (International Prostate Symptome Score) After 1, 3, 6 and 12 Months Compared to Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline and 1, 3, 6, 12 months

The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) is based on the answers to 7 questions concerning urinary symptoms plus one question concerning quality of life (QoL). Each of the seven symptoms includes the assignment of scores from 0 to 5. The total score can therefore range from 0 to 35 points (asymptomatic to very symptomatic). The patient's quality of life (QoL) was evaluated separately in this clinical study.

The sum of IPSS questions 2, 4, and 7 related to irritative symptoms. The total score of irritative symptoms can therefore range from 0 to 15 points (asymptomatic to very symptomatic).

Baseline and 1, 3, 6, 12 months
Change in Maximum Urinary Flow Rate After 1, 3, 6 and 12 Months Compared to Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months
Baseline and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months
Change in Average Urinary Flow Rate After 1, 3, 6 and 12 Months Compared to Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months
Baseline and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months
Percent Change in Mean Values of Prostate Gland Volume at 3, 6 and 12 Months Compared to Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline and 3, 6 and 12 months
Change in the volume of the prostate gland as a percentage of the baseline according to transrectal ultrasound
Baseline and 3, 6 and 12 months
Change in Mean Values of Micturition Volume at 3, 6 and 12 Months Compared to Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline and 3, 6 and 12 months
Baseline and 3, 6 and 12 months
Change in the Mean Values of Residual Urine Volume at 3, 6 and 12 Months Compared to Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline and 3, 6 and 12 months
according to transabdominal ultrasound
Baseline and 3, 6 and 12 months
Change in Quality of Life (QoL Index of IPSS) at 3, 6 and 12 Months Compared to Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline and 3, 6 and 12 months
Quality of life (QoL) Due to Urinary Symptoms is an eight point of the IPSS scale referred to the patient's quality of life. The answers to this question range from "delighted" to "terrible" or 0 to 5.
Baseline and 3, 6 and 12 months
Change in Total Value of Risk Factors for Progression (Total Score of IPSS, Prostate Volume, PSA Level, Maximum Urinary Flow Rate, Residual Urine Volume) Compared to Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline and 3, 6 and 12 months

To assess the risk of BPH progression, the following were used: 1) moderate to severe BPH symptoms (ie, IPSS total score> 7); 2) an increase in the volume of the prostate gland (> 30 cm^2); 3) increased PSA level in the blood (≥ 1.4 ng / ml); 4) a decrease in Qmax (<12 ml / s) and 5) a large volume of residual urine (> 200 ml).

The total value of risk factors for progression is assessed as the sum of the risk factors that the patient had at the time of inclusion in the study (presence of risk factors = 1 point, absence = 0 points). After 3, 6 and 12 months of treatment, the dynamics of risk factors for progression was assessed: an increase in the severity of the risk factor meant +1, no change = 0, a decrease in the severity of the risk factor of -1.

Baseline and 3, 6 and 12 months
Number of Episodes of Acute Urinary Retention, Surgical Intervention During the Observation Period
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 25, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 25, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

October 29, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 28, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 1, 2018

Last Verified

November 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MMH-AZ-001-I

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Subscribe