- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01743677
CP-690,550 Thorough QTc Study
August 27, 2020 updated by: Pfizer
A PHASE 1, RANDOMIZED, PLACEBO- AND POSITIVE-CONTROLLED CROSS-OVER STUDY TO DETERMINE THE EFFECT OF SINGLE-DOSE CP-690,550 ON QTC INTERVAL IN HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS
ICH E14 recommends that a thorough QT/QTc (TQT) study should be performed to determine whether intensive monitoring of QT interval in target patient populations is required during later stages of development.
The current study is designed to ascertain whether CP-690,550 is associated with QTc prolongation.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The current study is designed to ascertain whether CP-690,550 is associated with QTc prolongation
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
60
Phase
- Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 55 years (Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Healthy male and/or female subjects between ages of 18 and 55 years, inclusive.
- Body Mass Index (BMI) of approximately 18 to 30 kg/m2; and a total body weight >50 kg (110 lbs).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Use of tobacco- or nicotine-containing products in excess of equivalent of 5 cigarettes per day.
- 12-lead ECG demonstrating QTc >450 msec or other clinically significant abnormalities at Screening.
- History of risk factors for QT prolongation or torsades de pointes.
- Pregnant or nursing women; women of childbearing potential unwilling or unable to use an acceptable method of nonhormonal contraception from at least 14 days prior to first dose until completion of follow-up.
- Use of prescription or nonprescription drugs, vitamins and dietary supplements within 7 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) prior to first dose of trial medication.
- Any clinically significant infections within past 3 months or evidence of infection in past 7 days.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
|
Single dose placebo tablets (5 tablets)
|
|
Experimental: CP-690,550 100 mg
|
Single dose 100 mg (5 x 20 mg tablets)
|
|
Active Comparator: Moxifloxacin hydrochloride
|
Single dose Avelox 400 mg tablet
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 0.25 Hour Post-Dose
Time Frame: 0.25 hour post-dose
|
Triplicate 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated.
The time corresponding to the beginning of depolarization to repolarization of the ventricles (QT interval) was adjusted for RR interval using the QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR).
Data is reported as Least Squares (LS) mean difference (CP-690,550 minus Placebo, baseline-adjusted).
|
0.25 hour post-dose
|
|
Mean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 0.5 Hour Post-Dose
Time Frame: 0.5 hour post-dose
|
Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated.
The QT interval was adjusted for RR interval using the QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR).
Data is reported as LS mean difference (CP-690,550 minus Placebo, baseline-adjusted).
|
0.5 hour post-dose
|
|
Mean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 1 Hour Post-Dose
Time Frame: 1 hour post-dose
|
Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated.
The QT interval was adjusted for RR interval using the QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR).
Data is reported as LS mean difference (CP-690,550 minus Placebo, baseline-adjusted).
|
1 hour post-dose
|
|
Mean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 2 Hours Post-Dose
Time Frame: 2 hours post-dose
|
Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated.
The QT interval was adjusted for RR interval using the QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR).
Data is reported as LS mean difference (CP-690,550 minus Placebo, baseline-adjusted).
|
2 hours post-dose
|
|
Mean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 4 Hours Post-Dose
Time Frame: 4 hours post-dose
|
Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated.
The QT interval was adjusted for RR interval using the QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR).
Data is reported as LS mean difference (CP-690,550 minus Placebo, baseline-adjusted).
|
4 hours post-dose
|
|
Mean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 8 Hours Post-Dose
Time Frame: 8 hours post-dose
|
Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated.
The QT interval was adjusted for RR interval using the QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR).
Data is reported as LS mean difference (CP-690,550 minus Placebo, baseline-adjusted).
|
8 hours post-dose
|
|
Mean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 12 Hours Post-Dose
Time Frame: 12 hours post-dose
|
Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated.
The QT interval was adjusted for RR interval using the QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR).
Data is reported as LS mean difference (CP-690,550 minus Placebo, baseline-adjusted).
|
12 hours post-dose
|
|
Mean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 16 Hours Post-Dose
Time Frame: 16 hours post-dose
|
Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated.
The QT interval was adjusted for RR interval using the QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR).
Data is reported as LS mean difference (CP-690,550 minus Placebo, baseline-adjusted).
|
16 hours post-dose
|
|
Mean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 24 Hours Post-Dose
Time Frame: 24 hours post-dose
|
Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated.
The QT interval was adjusted for RR interval using the QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR).
Data is reported as LS mean difference (CP-690,550 minus Placebo, baseline-adjusted).
|
24 hours post-dose
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between Moxifloxacin Compared to Placebo
Time Frame: 2 hours post-dose
|
Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated.
The QT interval was adjusted for RR interval using the QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR).
Data is reported as LS mean difference (moxifloxacin minus Placebo, baseline-adjusted).
|
2 hours post-dose
|
|
Mean Time-Matched Difference in QTcB Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo
Time Frame: 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours post-dose
|
Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated.
The QT interval was adjusted for RR interval using the QT and RR from each ECG by Bazett's formula (QTcB = QT divided by square root of RR).
Data is reported as LS mean difference (CP-690,550 minus Placebo, baseline-adjusted).
|
0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours post-dose
|
|
Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time [AUC (0 - ∞)] for CP-690,550
Time Frame: 0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose
|
AUC (0 - ∞)= Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero (pre-dose) to extrapolated infinite time (0 - ∞).
It is obtained from AUC (0 - t) plus AUC (t - ∞).
|
0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose
|
|
Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) for CP-690,550
Time Frame: 0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose
|
Area under the plasma concentration time-curve from zero to the last measured concentration (AUClast).
|
0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose
|
|
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of CP-690,550
Time Frame: 0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose
|
0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose
|
|
|
Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) for CP-690,550
Time Frame: 0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose
|
0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose
|
|
|
Plasma Decay Half-Life (t1/2) of CP-690,550
Time Frame: 0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose
|
Plasma decay half-life is the time measured for the plasma concentration of drug to decrease by one half.
|
0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose
|
|
Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time [AUC (0 - ∞)] of CP-690,550 by Cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) Genotype
Time Frame: 0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose
|
AUC (0 - ∞)= Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero (pre-dose) to extrapolated infinite time (0 - ∞).
It is obtained from AUC (0 - t) plus AUC (t - ∞).
Variation in CYP2C19 gene affected the pharmacokinetics of CP-690,550.
AUC (0 - ∞) categorized by genotype into poor metabolizer, extensive metabolizer and ultra extensive metabolizer of CYP2C19.
|
0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose
|
|
Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of CP-690,550 by CYP2C19 Genotype
Time Frame: 0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose
|
Area under the plasma concentration time-curve from zero to the last measured concentration (AUClast).
Variation in CYP2C19 gene affected the pharmacokinetics of CP-690,550.
AUClast categorized by genotype as poor metabolizer, extensive metabolizer and ultra extensive metabolizer of CYP2C19.
|
0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose
|
|
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of CP-690,550 by CYP2C19 Genotype
Time Frame: 0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose
|
Variation in CYP2C19 gene affected the pharmacokinetics of CP-690,550.
Cmax categorized by genotype as poor metabolizer, extensive metabolizer and ultra extensive metabolizer of CYP2C19.
|
0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose
|
|
Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of CP-690,550 by CYP2C19 Genotype
Time Frame: 0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose
|
Variation in CYP2C19 gene affected the pharmacokinetics of CP-690,550.
Tmax categorized by genotype as poor metabolizer, extensive metabolizer and ultra extensive metabolizer of CYP2C19.
|
0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose
|
|
Plasma Decay Half-Life (t1/2) of CP-690,550 by CYP2C19 Genotype
Time Frame: 0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose
|
Plasma decay half-life is the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by one half.
Variation in CYP2C19 gene affected the pharmacokinetics of CP-690,550.
t1/2 categorized by genotype as poor metabolizer, extensive metabolizer and ultra extensive metabolizer of CYP2C19.
|
0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
October 26, 2007
Primary Completion (Actual)
February 7, 2008
Study Completion (Actual)
February 9, 2008
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
October 25, 2012
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 4, 2012
First Posted (Estimate)
December 6, 2012
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
September 16, 2020
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 27, 2020
Last Verified
August 1, 2020
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- A3921028
- 2007-004492-19 (EudraCT Number)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
IPD Plan Description
Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g.
protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions.
Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Healthy
-
University of Vermont Medical CenterAvocado Nutrition CenterRecruitingHealthy | Healthy Volunteers | Healthy Subjects | Healthy Volunteer | Healthy Adult | Healthy Volunteers Only | Healthy Male and Female Subjects | Healthy Non-smokersUnited States
-
Dragonfly TherapeuticsRecruitingHealthy | Healthy Participants | Healthy Adult Females | Volunteer | Healthy Adult MaleAustralia
-
University of PalermoCompletedHealthy | Healthy Volunteers | Healthy Subjects | Healthy Participants | Static Stretching | Stretch | StretchingItaly
-
Prevent Age Resort "Pervaya Liniya"RecruitingHealthy Aging | Healthy Diet | Healthy LifestyleRussian Federation
-
Umm Al-Qura UniversityActive, not recruitingHealthy | Healthy Participants | Healthy Adult | Healthy Women | Healthy Adult Females | Healthy Adult Participants | Healthy Young Adults | Healthy Adult Female Participants | Healthy Adult Male | Poor Sleep Quality | Healthy (Controls) | Poor Sleeping Quality | Healthy Adult Male Subjects | Health Adult SubjectsSaudi Arabia
-
Maastricht University Medical CenterCompletedHealthy Volunteers | Healthy Subjects | Healthy AdultsNetherlands
-
University of PalermoCompletedHealthy Participants | Healthy Adult Participants | Healthy Young AdultsItaly
-
Yale UniversityNot yet recruitingHealth-related Benefits of Introducing Table Olives Into the Diet of Young Adults: Olives For HealthHealthy Diet | Healthy Lifestyle | Healthy Nutrition | CholesterolUnited States
-
PfizerNot yet recruitingHealthy | Healthy AdultsUnited States
-
Atisama TherapeuticsRecruitingHealthy | Healthy SmokerAustralia
Clinical Trials on CP-690,550
-
PfizerCompleted
-
PfizerCompletedPsoriasisUnited States, Canada, Germany, Colombia, Hungary, Japan, Mexico, Poland, Serbia, Taiwan, Ukraine
-
PfizerCompletedPsoriasisUnited States, Canada, Poland, Serbia, Germany, Ukraine, Taiwan, Mexico, Colombia, Hungary, Puerto Rico
-
PfizerCompletedJuvenile Idiopathic ArthritisUnited States, Spain, India, Canada, Australia, Mexico, Poland, Germany, Belgium, Israel, Ukraine, United Kingdom, China, Brazil, South Africa, Turkey (Türkiye), Argentina, Russia, Slovakia
-
PfizerCompletedRheumatoid ArthritisUnited States, Costa Rica, Czech Republic, Germany, Croatia, Canada, Korea, Republic of, Spain, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Australia, Bulgaria, Mexico, Slovakia, Poland, Philippines, Chile, Denmark, Dominican Republic, Finland, T... and more
-
PfizerCompletedPsoriasisUnited States, Denmark, Slovakia, Canada, Australia, Argentina, Bulgaria, Netherlands, United Kingdom, Brazil, Finland, Greece
-
PfizerCompletedHemodialysis | End-Stage Renal DiseaseUnited States