CP-690,550 Thorough QTc Study

August 27, 2020 updated by: Pfizer

A PHASE 1, RANDOMIZED, PLACEBO- AND POSITIVE-CONTROLLED CROSS-OVER STUDY TO DETERMINE THE EFFECT OF SINGLE-DOSE CP-690,550 ON QTC INTERVAL IN HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS

ICH E14 recommends that a thorough QT/QTc (TQT) study should be performed to determine whether intensive monitoring of QT interval in target patient populations is required during later stages of development. The current study is designed to ascertain whether CP-690,550 is associated with QTc prolongation.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The current study is designed to ascertain whether CP-690,550 is associated with QTc prolongation

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bruxelles, Belgium, 1070
        • Pfizer Clinical Research Unit
      • Singapore, Singapore, 188770
        • Pfizer Clinical Research Unit

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 55 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy male and/or female subjects between ages of 18 and 55 years, inclusive.
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) of approximately 18 to 30 kg/m2; and a total body weight >50 kg (110 lbs).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Use of tobacco- or nicotine-containing products in excess of equivalent of 5 cigarettes per day.
  • 12-lead ECG demonstrating QTc >450 msec or other clinically significant abnormalities at Screening.
  • History of risk factors for QT prolongation or torsades de pointes.
  • Pregnant or nursing women; women of childbearing potential unwilling or unable to use an acceptable method of nonhormonal contraception from at least 14 days prior to first dose until completion of follow-up.
  • Use of prescription or nonprescription drugs, vitamins and dietary supplements within 7 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) prior to first dose of trial medication.
  • Any clinically significant infections within past 3 months or evidence of infection in past 7 days.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Single dose placebo tablets (5 tablets)
Experimental: CP-690,550 100 mg
Single dose 100 mg (5 x 20 mg tablets)
Active Comparator: Moxifloxacin hydrochloride
Single dose Avelox 400 mg tablet

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 0.25 Hour Post-Dose
Time Frame: 0.25 hour post-dose
Triplicate 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated. The time corresponding to the beginning of depolarization to repolarization of the ventricles (QT interval) was adjusted for RR interval using the QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR). Data is reported as Least Squares (LS) mean difference (CP-690,550 minus Placebo, baseline-adjusted).
0.25 hour post-dose
Mean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 0.5 Hour Post-Dose
Time Frame: 0.5 hour post-dose
Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated. The QT interval was adjusted for RR interval using the QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR). Data is reported as LS mean difference (CP-690,550 minus Placebo, baseline-adjusted).
0.5 hour post-dose
Mean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 1 Hour Post-Dose
Time Frame: 1 hour post-dose
Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated. The QT interval was adjusted for RR interval using the QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR). Data is reported as LS mean difference (CP-690,550 minus Placebo, baseline-adjusted).
1 hour post-dose
Mean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 2 Hours Post-Dose
Time Frame: 2 hours post-dose
Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated. The QT interval was adjusted for RR interval using the QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR). Data is reported as LS mean difference (CP-690,550 minus Placebo, baseline-adjusted).
2 hours post-dose
Mean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 4 Hours Post-Dose
Time Frame: 4 hours post-dose
Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated. The QT interval was adjusted for RR interval using the QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR). Data is reported as LS mean difference (CP-690,550 minus Placebo, baseline-adjusted).
4 hours post-dose
Mean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 8 Hours Post-Dose
Time Frame: 8 hours post-dose
Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated. The QT interval was adjusted for RR interval using the QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR). Data is reported as LS mean difference (CP-690,550 minus Placebo, baseline-adjusted).
8 hours post-dose
Mean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 12 Hours Post-Dose
Time Frame: 12 hours post-dose
Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated. The QT interval was adjusted for RR interval using the QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR). Data is reported as LS mean difference (CP-690,550 minus Placebo, baseline-adjusted).
12 hours post-dose
Mean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 16 Hours Post-Dose
Time Frame: 16 hours post-dose
Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated. The QT interval was adjusted for RR interval using the QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR). Data is reported as LS mean difference (CP-690,550 minus Placebo, baseline-adjusted).
16 hours post-dose
Mean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 24 Hours Post-Dose
Time Frame: 24 hours post-dose
Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated. The QT interval was adjusted for RR interval using the QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR). Data is reported as LS mean difference (CP-690,550 minus Placebo, baseline-adjusted).
24 hours post-dose

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between Moxifloxacin Compared to Placebo
Time Frame: 2 hours post-dose
Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated. The QT interval was adjusted for RR interval using the QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR). Data is reported as LS mean difference (moxifloxacin minus Placebo, baseline-adjusted).
2 hours post-dose
Mean Time-Matched Difference in QTcB Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo
Time Frame: 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours post-dose
Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated. The QT interval was adjusted for RR interval using the QT and RR from each ECG by Bazett's formula (QTcB = QT divided by square root of RR). Data is reported as LS mean difference (CP-690,550 minus Placebo, baseline-adjusted).
0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours post-dose
Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time [AUC (0 - ∞)] for CP-690,550
Time Frame: 0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose
AUC (0 - ∞)= Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero (pre-dose) to extrapolated infinite time (0 - ∞). It is obtained from AUC (0 - t) plus AUC (t - ∞).
0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose
Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) for CP-690,550
Time Frame: 0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose
Area under the plasma concentration time-curve from zero to the last measured concentration (AUClast).
0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of CP-690,550
Time Frame: 0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose
0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose
Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) for CP-690,550
Time Frame: 0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose
0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose
Plasma Decay Half-Life (t1/2) of CP-690,550
Time Frame: 0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose
Plasma decay half-life is the time measured for the plasma concentration of drug to decrease by one half.
0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose
Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time [AUC (0 - ∞)] of CP-690,550 by Cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) Genotype
Time Frame: 0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose
AUC (0 - ∞)= Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero (pre-dose) to extrapolated infinite time (0 - ∞). It is obtained from AUC (0 - t) plus AUC (t - ∞). Variation in CYP2C19 gene affected the pharmacokinetics of CP-690,550. AUC (0 - ∞) categorized by genotype into poor metabolizer, extensive metabolizer and ultra extensive metabolizer of CYP2C19.
0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose
Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of CP-690,550 by CYP2C19 Genotype
Time Frame: 0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose
Area under the plasma concentration time-curve from zero to the last measured concentration (AUClast). Variation in CYP2C19 gene affected the pharmacokinetics of CP-690,550. AUClast categorized by genotype as poor metabolizer, extensive metabolizer and ultra extensive metabolizer of CYP2C19.
0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of CP-690,550 by CYP2C19 Genotype
Time Frame: 0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose
Variation in CYP2C19 gene affected the pharmacokinetics of CP-690,550. Cmax categorized by genotype as poor metabolizer, extensive metabolizer and ultra extensive metabolizer of CYP2C19.
0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose
Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of CP-690,550 by CYP2C19 Genotype
Time Frame: 0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose
Variation in CYP2C19 gene affected the pharmacokinetics of CP-690,550. Tmax categorized by genotype as poor metabolizer, extensive metabolizer and ultra extensive metabolizer of CYP2C19.
0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose
Plasma Decay Half-Life (t1/2) of CP-690,550 by CYP2C19 Genotype
Time Frame: 0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose
Plasma decay half-life is the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by one half. Variation in CYP2C19 gene affected the pharmacokinetics of CP-690,550. t1/2 categorized by genotype as poor metabolizer, extensive metabolizer and ultra extensive metabolizer of CYP2C19.
0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 26, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 7, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

February 9, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 25, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

December 6, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 16, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 27, 2020

Last Verified

August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy

Clinical Trials on CP-690,550

Subscribe