CP-690-550 Ointment For Chronic Plaque Psoriasis

December 14, 2020 updated by: Pfizer

A PHASE 2A, MULTI-SITE, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, PARALLEL-GROUP STUDY OF THE PILOT EFFICACY, SAFETY, AND PHARMACOKINETICS OF 2 OINTMENT FORMULATIONS OF CP-690,550 IN SUBJECTS WITH MILD TO MODERATE CHRONIC PLAQUE PSORIASIS

The study is being conducted to see whether CP-690,550 ointment has potential as a safe and effective treatment for adult patients with mild to moderate chronic plaque psoriasis.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

71

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Quebec, Canada, G1V 4X7
        • Centre de Recherche Dermatologique du Quebec Metropolitain
    • Ontario
      • Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, N2J 1C4
        • K.Papp Clinical Research Inc.
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H2K 4L5
        • Innovaderm Research Inc
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3Z 2S6
        • Siena Medical Research
    • Alabama
      • Mobile, Alabama, United States, 36608
        • Horizon Research Group, Inc.
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90045
        • Dermatology Research Associates
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90045
        • Expresscare Medical
    • Florida
      • Orange Park, Florida, United States, 32073
        • Park Avenue Dermatology, PA
    • Nebraska
      • Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68144
        • Skin Specialists, PC
    • New Mexico
      • Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States, 87106
        • Academic Dermatology Associates
    • South Dakota
      • Rapid City, South Dakota, United States, 57702
        • Health Concepts
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75231
        • Modern Research Associates, PLLC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Mild to moderate chronic plaque psoriasis (psoriasis vulgaris), with the duration of at least 6 months;
  • A target plaque of at least 9 sq. cm.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Demonstrates "rebound" or "flare" of chronic plaque psoriasis;
  • Non plaque form of psoriasis;
  • Currently have or history of psoriatic arthritis;
  • Current drug induced psoriasis;
  • Currently on systemic therapy or was on systemic therapy for psoriasis within the previous 6 months;
  • Currently on phototherapy for psoriasis or was on phototherapy within the previous 3 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Treatment Group A
2% CP-690,550 Ointment 1 twice daily for 4 weeks
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Treatment Group B
Vehicle 1 twice daily for 4 weeks
EXPERIMENTAL: Treatment Group C
2% CP-690,550 Ointment 2 twice daily for 4 weeks
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Treatment Group D
Vehicle 2 twice daily for 4 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent Change From Baseline in Target Plaque Severity Score (TPSS) at Week 4
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4
Target plaque was evaluated individually for signs of induration, scaling and erythema. Each of the 3 signs was rated on 5-point severity scale ranged from 0 to 4: 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The individual signs severity sub scores were summed to calculate TPSS. The total score varied in increments of 1 and ranged from 1 to 12, with higher scores representing greater severity of psoriasis.
Baseline, Week 4

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent Change From Baseline in Target Plaque Severity Score (TPSS) at Weeks 1, 2 and 3
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 3
Target plaque was evaluated individually for signs of induration, scaling and erythema. Each of the 3 signs was rated on 5-point severity scale ranged from 0 to 4: 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The individual signs severity sub scores were summed to calculate TPSS. The total score varied in increments of 1 and ranged from 1 to 12, with higher scores representing greater severity of psoriasis.
Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 3
Change From Baseline in Target Plaque Severity Score (TPSS) of Erythema, Induration and Scaling at Weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4
Target plaque severity was evaluated individually for signs of induration, scaling and erythema. Each of the 3 signs was rated on 5-point severity scale ranged from 0 to 4: 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked.
Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Area Overall Severity of Psoriasis Response of "Clear" (0) or "Almost Clear" (1)
Time Frame: Week 1, 2, 3, 4
Treatment area overall severity of psoriasis is global consideration of the erythema, induration and scaling across all psoriatic lesions, rated separately over the treatment area according to a 5-point severity scale ranged from 0 to 4: 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The severity scores are summed and averaged after which the total average is rounded to the nearest whole number score to determine the treatment area overall severity of psoriasis score and category. Total possible score range: 0=clear, 1=almost clear, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe.
Week 1, 2, 3, 4
Percentage of Participants Achieving Decrease From Baseline of Greater Than or Equal to 2 Points in Treatment Area Overall Severity of Psoriasis Score
Time Frame: Week 1, 2, 3, 4
Treatment area overall severity of psoriasis is global consideration of the erythema, induration and scaling across all psoriatic lesions, rated separately over the treatment area according to a 5-point severity scale ranged from 0 to 4: 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The severity scores are summed and averaged after which the total average is rounded to the nearest whole number score to determine the treatment area overall severity of psoriasis score and category. Total possible score: 0=clear, 1=almost clear, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe.
Week 1, 2, 3, 4
Percent Change From Baseline in Target Plaque Area at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4
A tracing of the target plaque on transparent film was used to quantify the target plaque area. The target plaque area was calculated by image analysis (planimetry). At baseline, target plaque area was determined prior to randomization to confirm the target plaque size of at least 9 cm^2.
Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4
Itch Severity Item (ISI)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4
The severity of itch was assessed using a single-item Patient Reported Outcome (PRO). Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to psoriasis at the treatment area over the past 24 hours on a numeric rating scale ranging from of 0-10 where, 0=no itching and 10=worst possible itching.
Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4
Change From Baseline in the Treatment Area Itch Severity Item (ISI) at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4
The severity of itch was assessed using a single-item PRO. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to psoriasis at the treatment area over the past 24 hours on a numeric rating scale ranging from of 0-10 where, 0=no itching and 10=worst possible itching.
Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4
Percentage of Participants in Each Patient Satisfaction With Study Medication (PSSM) Response Category
Time Frame: Week 4
The PSSM evaluates overall participants satisfaction with the study treatment. Participants response evaluation was based on single 7-point item: 1=very satisfied, 2=somewhat satisfied, 3=slightly satisfied, 4=neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, 5=slightly dissatisfied, 6=somewhat dissatisfied, and 7=very dissatisfied.
Week 4
Number of Participants With Administration Site Adverse Events
Time Frame: Baseline up to follow up visit (Day 36-39 after last dose of study treatment) (up to maximum of 9.5 weeks)
An adverse event was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. Application site adverse event included documentation of any clinically significant local reaction, e.g erosion, vesicles or scabbing.
Baseline up to follow up visit (Day 36-39 after last dose of study treatment) (up to maximum of 9.5 weeks)
Number of Participants With Burning/Stinging of Psoriatic or Perilesional Skin in The Treatment Area
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4
Burning/stinging symptoms at the treatment area including target plaque, additional plaque/s within the treatment area (if any) and treated perilesional skin (if any) were queried from the participants and scored by the investigator using a 4-point scale: 0=none; 1=Mild; 2=Moderate; 3=Severe. Except at baseline pre-dosing, burning/stinging was assessed for 2 time periods based on the maximum burning or stinging that the participant has experienced: Immediate (within 5 minutes after application); Persistent (beyond 5 minutes after application).
Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4
Number of Participants With Draize Score of Perilesional Skin in The Treatment Area
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4
Draize scoring evaluated perilesional skin within treatment area for erythema and presence/absence of other signs and symptoms. Erythema score ranged from 0 to 4 as: 0(no reaction visible), 1(trace reactions- barely perceptible pinkness), 2(mild reaction- readily visible pinkness), 3(moderate reaction- definite redness), 4 (Strong to severe reaction- very intense redness). Letter grade defined as: J(Burning, stinging, itching), E(Edema), P(Papules), V(Vesicles), B(Bulla reaction), S(Spreading), W(Weeping), I(Induration), XC(Additional comments). Superficial observations defined as: G(Glazing), Y(Peeling), C(Scab), D(Hyperpigmentation), H(Hypopigmentation), F(Fissuring), R(Erosion), U(Ulceration), K(Scaling). Erythema and other signs/symptoms with at least 1 participant with Draize Score of Perilesional Skin in the treatment area were reported in this outcome measure.
Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4
Change From Baseline in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 1, 2, 3, 4
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4
Blood pressure (BP) was measured in duplicate (approximately 5 minutes apart) using a standard calibrated BP measuring device. BP defined as pressure exerted by circulating blood upon walls of blood vessels. Diastolic BP is minimum pressure in arteries, near beginning of cardiac cycle when ventricles are filled with blood. Systolic BP is peak pressure in arteries, near end of the cardiac cycle when ventricles are contracting. Normal blood pressure is less than 120 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) systolic and less than 80 mmHg diastolic. Change=value at week 1, 2, 3, 4 minus value at baseline.
Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate at Week 1, 2, 3, 4
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4
Heart (pulse) rate was measured in duplicate (approximately 5 minutes apart) for a minimum of 30 seconds. Heart rate is the number of heartbeats per unit of time, usually per minute. The heart rate is based on the number of contractions of the ventricles (the lower chambers of the heart). Change=value at week 1, 2, 3, 4 minus value at baseline.
Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4
Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings at Week 4
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4
A single standard supine 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) was performed after the participant had rested quietly for at least 10 minutes. ECG parameters included RR interval, PR interval, QRS complex, QT interval, QTcB (corrected for heart rate using Bazett's formula) interval, and QTcF (corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's formula) interval.
Baseline, Week 4
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Level at Week 2, 4
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 2, 4
Baseline, Week 2, 4
Change From Baseline in Platelet and Neutrophil Count at Week 2, 4
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 2, 4
Baseline, Week 2, 4
Change From Baseline in Creatinine Level at Week 2, 4
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 2, 4
Baseline, Week 2, 4
Change From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) and Creatine Kinase (CK) Level at Week 2, 4
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 2, 4
Baseline, Week 2, 4
Plasma Concentration of CP-690,550
Time Frame: 0 (predose), 1, 2 and 4-9 hours postdose on Day 29 or early termination
Summary statistics were calculated by setting concentration values below the lower limit of quantification (lower limit of quantification=0.1 nanogram per milliliter [ng/mL]) to zero. Summary statistics were not presented if number of observations above lower limit of quantification (NALQ) = 0.
0 (predose), 1, 2 and 4-9 hours postdose on Day 29 or early termination

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

February 16, 2011

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

November 29, 2011

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

November 29, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 22, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 22, 2010

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

November 23, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

January 11, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 14, 2020

Last Verified

December 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Psoriasis

Clinical Trials on CP-690,550 Ointment 1

3
Subscribe