Influence of Fascial Manipulation on Postural Sway and Ankle Range of Motion

April 19, 2018 updated by: Neha C. Kamani, Manipal University

Influence of Fascial Manipulation on Postural Sway and Ankle Range of Motion in Participants With Chronic Ankle Instability

Fascia is defined as the soft tissue component of the connective tissue system. It is a continuous mesh that has several functions such as maintaining structural integrity and providing support and protection. Ligaments are part of the dense connective tissue system.

Studies conducted for ankle retinacula, which are thickened bands of fascia, also confirmed the presence of nervous tissue and proprioceptors within. Specific changes are seen in the MRI of ankle retinacula of individuals with chronic ankle instability. These changes include thickening of subcutaneous tissue. These structural changes may be responsible for interrupting the signals from the mechanoreceptors or also in damaging them.

Since fascial manipulation can help reduce the densifications of deep fascia, it is possible that on restoring the original structural and material properties, the proprioception may improve due to clearer signals from the mechanoreceptors. For a normal individual, recurrent sprains may lead to occupational absence and difficulty with their ADLs. Hence, there is a need for this study to determine the influence of FM on chronic ankle instability.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Chronic ankle instability (CAI) is defined as "repetitive bouts of lateral ankle instability due to the sprain of the lateral collateral ligament of the ankle, resulting in numerous ankle sprains, episodes of giving way and decreased physical activity.

Individuals with chronic ankle instability often complain of repeated turning of the ankle especially on uneven surfaces, self-reported feelings of the ankle feeling wobbly way and a past history of at least one severe lateral ankle sprain.

The recurrence of ankle sprains can be attributed to the proprioceptive deficits that occur due to joint deafferentation. Freeman et al originally proposed that joint deafferentation is the loss of sensory input from the articular mechanoreceptors located in the capsule and ligaments of the affected joint. Proprioceptive deficits manifest in the form of impaired balance and postural control.

The objective of the study is to determine the effectiveness of fascial manipulation on improving ankle instability by measuring pre- and post-intervention measures of postural sway and ankle range of motion.

Luigi Stecco's biomechanical model acts as the foundation for describing the framework of the fascial system. This model describes a myofascial unit (MFU) as the functional unit of this system. A myofascial unit consists of unidirectional muscle fibers, fascia, nerve structures and other retinacular structures such as joint capsules and ligaments. Two crucial points can be identified along a myofascial unit. These points are known as the centre of perception (CP) and centre of coordination (CC). A total of six myofascial units have been established for each body segment and it is in these myofascial units that dysfunction will be seen. The indication or exhibition of these dysfunctions varies from one individual to the next. However, the etiology remains universal i.e. densification of the CC due to abnormal tensile and mechanical stresses. Movement and palpation assessments are carried out to identify the involved CCs which are focused on during treatment using fascial manipulation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

13

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Karnataka
      • Udupi, Karnataka, India, 576104
        • Centre for Sports Science, Medicine and Research

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Cumberland ankle instability score ≤27
  • Subjective feeling of giving way of the ankle
  • No history of acute injuries
  • Previous history of ankle sprain

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lower limb surgery
  • Neurological disorders with balance impairments (e.g. Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, stroke, multiple sclerosis)
  • Known history of Diagnosed diabetic neuropathy
  • Vestibular balance disorders
  • Deformities of the foot
  • History of acute ankle sprain
  • Skin lesions localized to the affected lower limb

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Individuals with Chronic Ankle instability
Individuals with history of ankle sprains will be screened using the inclusion criteria before being included in the study
Myofascial release of densified centers of coordination

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Center of pressure (COP) velocity
Time Frame: 30 seconds
COP velocity represents total distance traveled by the COP over time.
30 seconds
Center of pressure excursion
Time Frame: 30 seconds
COP excursion represents the total distance traveled by the COP over the course of the trial duration
30 seconds

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ankle dorsiflexion range of motion
Time Frame: 1 week
Amount of flexion that can occur at the ankle joint in a weight bearing lunge starting from a neutral position
1 week
Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI) questionnaire
Time Frame: 1 week
Subjective questionnaire
1 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

February 12, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

April 15, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

April 19, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 23, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 23, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

February 26, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

April 20, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 19, 2018

Last Verified

April 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ManipalU
  • CTRI/2018/02/011762 (REGISTRY: Clinical Trials Registry - India)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ankle Injuries and Disorders : Chronic Ankle Instability

Clinical Trials on Fascial Manipulation

3
Subscribe